Combined Effect of Enamel Deproteinization and Intermediate Bonding in the Retention of Pit and Fissure Sealants in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective: This manuscript shows if enamel deproteinization along with an intermediate layer of bonding enhances the retention of pit and fissure sealants.. Study Design: Two hundred six mandibular first permanent molars were allocated to Group I (n=103) and Group II (n=103). Group I underwent deproteinization, acid etching, bonding agent application and pit & fissure sealant placement while Group II treated with acid etching followed by pit & fissure sealant application only. Clinical analysis of all the teeth in the two groups was performed at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months respectively. Pearson's chi – square test was utilized to evaluate the success of both treatment procedures (p<0.05). Results: At 12 months follow up the differences between the groups pertaining to Marginal integrity, Marginal discoloration and Anatomical form were statistically significant suggesting enhanced retention in Group I. Conclusions: Enamel deproteinization along with the use of intermediate bonding layer significantly enhances the retention of pit and fissure sealants in terms of enhanced marginal integrity, decreased marginal discoloration and preserving the anatomical form.

Enamel deproteinization, Intermediate bonding, Pit and fissure sealant, Sodium hypochlorite

1. Chestnut IG, Schafer F, Jacobson AP, Stephen KW. Incremental suscepti-bility of individual tooth surfaces to dental caries in Scottish adolescents. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 24: 11-16, 1996.

2. Hannigan A, O’Mullane DM, Barry D, Schafer F, Roberts AJ. A caries susceptibility classification of tooth surfaces by survival time. Caries Res 34: 103-108, 2000.

3. Wilson IP. Preventive dentistry. Dent Dig 1:70-72, 1895.

4. Hyatt TP. Prophylactic odontotomy: the cutting into the tooth for the preven-tion of disease. Dent Cosmos 65: 234-241, 1923.

5. Bodecker CF. Eradication of enamel fissures. Dent Items 51: 859-866, 1929.

6. Kline H, Knutson JW. Studies on dental caries XIII. Effect of ammoniacal silver nitrate on caries in the first permanent molar. J Am Dent Assoc 29: 1420-1426, 1942.

7. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34: 849-853, 1955.

8. Cueto EI, Buonocore MG. Adhesive sealing of pits and fissures for caries prevention. J Dent Res 44: 137, 1965.

9. Simonsen RJ. Pit and fissure sealant: Review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 24: 393-414, 2002.

10. Silverstone LM, Hicks MJ, Featherstone MJ. Oral fluid contamination of etched enamel surfaces. A SEM study. J Am Dent Assoc 110: 329-332, 1985.

11. Droz D, Schiele MJ, Panighi MM. Penetration and microleakage of dental sealants in artificial fissures. J Dent Child 71: 41-44, 2004.

12. Eliades A, Birpou E, Eliades T, Eliades G. Self – adhesive restoratives as pit and fissure sealants: A comparative laboratory study. Dent Mater 29: 752- 762, 2013.

13. Gillcrist JA, Vaughan MP, Plumlee GN, Jr, Wade G. Clinical sealant reten-tion following two different tooth cleaning techniques. J Public Health Dent 58: 254-256, 1998.

14. De Craene GP, Martens LC, Dermaut LR, Surmont PA. A clinical evaluation of a light-cured fissure sealant (Helioseal). J Dent Child 56: 97-102, 1989.

15. Godoy GF, Araujo FB. Enhancement of fissure sealant penetration and adap-tation: the enameloplasty technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent 19: 13-18, 1994.

16. Berry EAI, Ward M. Bond strength of resin composite to air – abraded enamel. Quintessence Int 26: 559-562, 1995.

17. Wright GZ, Hatibovic KS, Millenaar DW, Braverman I. The safety and efficacy of treatment with air-abrasion technology. Int J Paediatr Dent 9: 133- 140, 1999.

18. Gwinnett AJ. The bonding of sealants to enamel. J Am Soc Prev Dent 3:

21- 29, 1973.

19. Guba CJ, Cochran MA, Swartz ML. The effect of varied etching and etching solution viscosity on bond strength and enamel morphology. Operative Dent 19: 146-153, 1993.

20. Ripa LW. The current status of pit and fissure sealants: A review. J Can Dent Assoc 51: 367-380, 1985.

21. Borem LM, Feigal RJ. Reducing microleakage of sealants under salivary contamination: An in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 25: 283-289, 1994.

22. Robinson C, Shore RC, Bonass WA, Brookes SJ, Boteva E, Kirkham J. Identification of human serum albumin in human caries lesions of enamel: the role of putative inhibitors of remineralisation. Caries Res 32: 193-199, 1998.

23. Hara AT, Zero DT. The caries environment: saliva, pellicle, diet, and hard tissue ultrastructure. Dent Clin North Am 54: 455-467, 2010.

24. McDonald EE, Goldberg HA, Tabbara N, Mendes FM, Siqueira WL. Histatin 1 resists proteolytic degradation when adsorbed to hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 90: 268-272, 2011.

25. Shore RC, Kirkham J, Brookes SJ, Wood SR, Robinson C. Distribution of exogenous proteins in caries lesions in relation to the pattern of demineral-isation. Caries Res 34: 188-193, 2000.

26. Espinosa R, Valencia R, Uribe M, Ceja I, Saadia M. Enamel deproteinization and its effect on acid etching: An in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 33: 13- 20, 2008.

27. Pukallus ML, Plonka KA, Holcombe TF, Barnett AG, Walsh LJ, Seow WK. A randomized controlled trial of a 10 percent CPP – ACP cream to reduce mutans streptococci colonization. Pediatr Dent 35: 550- 555, 2013.

28. Harleen N, Yeluri R, Munshi AK. Enamel deproteinization before acid etching and its effect on the shear bond strength – An in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 36: 19-23, 2011.

29. Feigal RJ, Musherure P, Gillespie B, Levy-Polack M, Quelhas I, Hebling J. Improved sealant retention with bonding agents: A clinical study of two –bottle and single – bottle systems. J Dent Res 79: 1850-1856, 2000.

30. Feigal RJ, Hitt J, Splieth C. Retaining sealant on salivary contaminated enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 124: 88-97, 1993.

31. Boksman L, McConnell RJ, Carson B, Jones EF. A 2- year clinical evalu-ation of two pit and fissure sealants placed with and without the use of a bonding agent. Quintessence Int 24: 131-133, 1993.

32. Godoy GF, Gwinnett AJ. An SEM study of fissure surfaces conditioned with a scraping technique. Clin Prev Dent 9: 9-13, 1987.

33. Gwinnett AJ, Matsui A. A study of enamel adhesives: The physical relation-ship between enamel and adhesive. Arch Oral Biol 12: 1615-1620, 1967.

34. Buonocore MG, Matsui A, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of resin dental mate-rials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol 13: 61- 70, 1968.

35. Gwinnett AJ. Structure and composition of enamel. Oper Dent Suppl 5: 10- 17, 1992.

36. Van Meerbeek B, Inouse S, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Enamel and dentin adhesion. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. A contemporary approach. Chicago: Quintessence; 178-235, 2001.

37. Dakin HD. On the use of certain antiseptic substances in the treatment of infected wounds. Br Med J 2: 318-320, 1915.

38. Crane AB. A predictable root canal technique. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 69, 1920.

39. Justus R, Cubero T, Ondarza R, Morales F. A new technique with sodium hypochlorite to increase bracket shear bond strength of fluoride releasing resin – modified glass ionomer cements: comparing shear bond strength of two adhesive systems with enamel surface deproteinization before etching. Semin Orthod 16: 66-75, 2010.

40. Hitt JC, Feigal RJ. Use of a bonding agent to reduce sealant sensitivity to moisture contamination: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 14: 41-46, 1992.

41. Borem LM, Feigal RJ. Reducing microleakage of sealants under salivary contamination: digital image analysis evaluation. Quintessence Int 25: 283- 289, 1994.

42. Symons AL, Chu CY, Meyers IA. The effect of fissure morphology and pretreatment of the enamel surface on penetration and adhesion of fissure sealants. J Oral Rehabil 23: 791-798, 1996.

43. Gomez SS, Bravo P, Morales R, Romero A, Oyarzun A. Resin penetration in artificial enamel carious lesions after using sodium hypochlorite as a deproteinization agent. J Clin Pediatr Dent 39: 51-56, 2014.

44. Pithon MM, Campos MS, Coqueiro Rda S. Effect of bromelain and papain gel on enamel deproteinisation before orthodontic bracket bonding. Aust Orthod J 32: 23-30, 2016.

45. Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Enamel bond strengths of “one – bottle” adhesives. Pediatr Dent 20: 259-262, 1998.

46. Grande RHM, Pedroso De Lima AC, Rodrigues Filho LE, Ferreira Witzel M. Clinical evaluation of an adhesive used as a fissure sealant. Am J Dent 13: 167-170, 2000.

47. Torres CP, Balbo P, Gomes-Silva JM, Ramos RP, Palma-Dibb RG, Borsatto MC. Effect of individual or simultaneous curing on sealant bond strength. J Dent Child 72: 31-35, 2005.

48. Ahuja B, Yeluri R, Baliga SM, Munshi AK. Enamel deproteinization before acid etching – A scanning electron microscopic observation. J Clin Pediatr Dent 35: 169-172, 2010.

49. Rangel AG, Vazquez CL, Giron CBT, Garcia DE, Rodrigguez SR, Guillen AP. In vitro assessment of retention and microleakage in pit and fissure sealants following enamel pre – etching with sodium hypochlorite depro-teinization. Eur J Paediatr Dent 16: 212-216, 2015.

50. Pinar A, Sepel E, Aren G, Bolukbasl N, Ulukapl H, Turan N. Clinical perfor-mance of sealants with and without a bonding agent. Quintessence Int 36: 355- 360, 2005.