Are Increased Masticatory Forces Risk for Primary 2nd Molars without Successors? A 3D FEA Study

Objective: Persistent primary teeth with healthy crown-root structures and acceptable functional and esthetic properties may be preserved over a long-term period if needed. However, they may experience root resorption, ankylosis or infraocclusion especially in the second or third decades of life. Despite a lack of sufficient detailed data, increases in occlusal forces by age are known to cause destructive stresses on root surfaces and periodontal tissue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of increasing occlusal forces on mandibular persistent primary molars by using 3D finite element analysis. Study Design: The impact of increased masticatory forces on compressive and tensile stresses in tooth and surrounding tissue was simulated in two different models (simulating child and adult mouths) by using 3D finite element analysis. Results: In both models, the stress values increased by age and compressive stresses were seen on internal root surfaces, while the tensile stresses focused on the furcation area and external root surfaces. Conclusion: It was concluded that practices such as reducing occlusal surface width may be used to diminish the occlusal forces for long-term tooth survival in persistent primary molars.

Hypodontia; Stress analysis; Computer simulation; Biomechanics; Root resorption; Ankylosis

1. Ngan P, Heinrichs D, Hodnett S. Early management of congenitally missing mandibular second premolars: a review. Hong Kong Dent J 8: 40- 45, 2011.

2. Santos L L. Treatment planning in the presence of congenitally absent second premolars: a review of the literature. J Clin Pediatr Dent 27: 13- 17, 2002.

3. Robinson S, Chan M F. New teeth from old: treatment options for retained primary teeth. Br Dent J 207: 315-320, 2009.

4. Ledermann P D, Hassell T M, Hefti A F. Osseointegrated dental implants as alternative therapy to bridge construction or orthodontics in young patients: seven years of clinical experience. Pediatr Dent 15: 327-333, 1993.

5. Lundberg T, Isaksson S. A clinical follow-up study of 278 autotrans-planted teeth. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34: 181-185, 1996.

6. Bjerklin K, Bennett J. The long-term survival of lower second primary molars in subjects with agenesis of the premolars. Eur J Orthod 22: 245- 255, 2000.

7. Hvaring C L, Ogaard B, Stenvik A, Birkeland K. The prognosis of retained primary molars without successors: infraocclusion, root resorption and restorations in 111 patients. Eur J Orthod 36: 26-30, 2014.

8. Mancini G, Francini E, Vichi M, Tollaro I, Romagnoli P. Primary tooth ankylosis. Report of a case with histological analysis. ASDC J Dent Child 62: 215-219, 1995.

9. Mass E, Kupietzky A, Maye F, Bimstein E. Alveolar bone height in infra-occluded primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 28: 221-224, 2004.

10. Giachetti L, Bertini F, Landi D. Morphological and functional rehabilitation of severely infra-occluded primary molars in the presence of aplasia of the permanent premolar: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 93: 121-124, 2005.

11. Nanci A. Ten Cate’s oral histology, development, structure, and function. Mosby, Elsevier; 268-289, 2008.

12. Nelson S J and Ash M M. Wheeler’s dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion. Saunders, Elsevier; 45-66, 2010.

13. Harokopakis-Hajishengallis E. Physiologic root resorption in primary teeth: molecular and histological events. J Oral Sci 49: 1-12, 2007.

14. Mohammed S D, Desai H. Basic concepts of finite element analysis and its applications in dentistry: An overview. Oral Hyg Health 2: 156-160, 2014.

15. Ramoğlu S, Ozan O. Finite element methods in dentistry. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 24: 175-180, 2014.

16. Trivedi S. Finite element analysis: A boon to dentistry. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 4: 200-203, 2014.

17. Owais A I, Shaweesh M, Abu Alhaija E S. Maximum occlusal bite force for children in different stages. Eur J Orthod 35: 427-433, 2013.

18. Sathyanarayana H P, Premkumar S. Assessment of maximum voluntary bite force in children and adults with normal occlusion. International Journal of Pharmacutical Science and Health Care 2: 64-70, 2012.

19. Arangannal P, Chandra B, Hariharan V S, Vishnurekha, Jeevarathan, Vijayaprabha. Enamel thickness in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 37: 177- 181, 2012.

20. Grine F E. 2005. Enamel thickness of deciduous and permanent molars in homo sapiens. Am J Phys Anthropol 126: 14-31, 2005.

21. Ruschel H C, Chevitarese O. A comparative study of dentin thickness of primary human molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 27: 277-281, 2003.

22. Fiorellini J P, Stathopoulou P G. Anatomy of periodontium. In: Newman M G, Takei H, Klokkevold P R, Carranza F A, eds. Carranza’s clinical periodontology. Saunders, Elsevier; 9-39, 2015.

23. Swasty D, Lee J S, Huang J C, Maki K, Gansky S A, Hatcher D, Miller A J. Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67: 491-500, 2009.

24. Mahoney E, Holt A, Swain M, Kilpatrick N. The hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary molar teeth: an ultra-micro-indentation study. J Dent 28: 589-594, 2000.

25. Selna L G, Shillingburg H T Jr, Kerr P A. Finite element analysis of dental structures-axisymmetric and plane stress idealizations. J Biomed Mater Res 9: 237-252, 1975.

26. Moroi H H, Okimoto K, Moroi R, Terada Y. Numeric approach to the biomechanical analysis of thermal effects in coated implants. Int J Prosthodont 6: 564-572, 1993.

27. Ko C C, Chu C S, Chung K H, Lee M C. Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent 68: 421-427, 1992.

28. Castelo P M, Pereira L J, Bonjardim L R, Gaviao M B. Changes in bite force, masticatory muscle thickness, and facial morphology between primary and mixed dentition in preschool children with normal occlusion. Ann Anat 192: 23-6, 2010.

29. Varga S, Spalj S, Lapter Varga M, Anic Milosevic S, Mestrovic S, Slaj M. Maximum voluntary molar bite force in subjects with normal occlusion. Eur J Orthod 33: 427-33, 2011.

30. Gultekin B A, Gultekin P, Yalcin S. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry. In: Ebrahimi F ed. Finite element analysis - new trends and developments. InTech; 21-54, 2012.

31. Holmgren E P, Seckinger R J, Kilgren L M, Mante F. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis -a two dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol 24: 80-88, 1998.

32. Borcic J, Braut A. Finite element analysis in dental medicine. In: Ebrahimi F ed. Finite element analysis - new trends and developments. InTech; 3-20, 2012.

33. Holmes D C, Diaz-Arnold A M, Leary J M. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent 75: 140-147, 1996.

34. Park J K, Hur B, Kim S K. Stress distribution of Class V composite resin restorations: A three-dimensional finite element study. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 33: 28-38, 2008.

35. Chandra S, Chandra S, Chandra G. Textbook of operative dentistry. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi; 8-19, 2007.

36. Soratur S H. Essential of dental materials. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi; 31-104, 2002

37. Panagiotopoulou O, Kupczik K, Cobb S N. The mechanical function of the periodontal ligament in the macaque mandible: a validation and sensitivity study using finite element analysis. J Anat 218: 75-86, 2011.

38. Fongsamootr T, Suttakul P. Effect of Periodontal Ligament on Stress Distribution and Displacement of Tooth and Bone Structure Using Finite Element Simulation. Engineering Journal 19: 99-108, 2015.