In Vivo Evaluation of Customized Pulse Oximeter and Sensitivity Pulp Tests for Assessment Of Pulp Vitality

Objective: The purpose of this study was to test a customized pulse oximeter (CPO) for evaluation of pulp vitality in primary and permanent teeth against clinical diagnosis (vital and untreated non-vital) in order to expand its clinical use for pulp preservation. Study design: CPO was evaluated on intact primary and permanent central or lateral incisor (CI, LI) teeth-vital (group 1, 20n each); untreated non-vital (group 2, 10n each) and; root filled non-vital (group 3, 10n each) of children 4–12 years according to inclusion/ exclusion criteria. For each patient CPO was first applied on finger followed by vitality tests in following sequence-electrical, pulse oximetry and thermal tests. Results: Mean oxygen saturation (%SpO2) in permanent and primary–vital teeth was 88.78% & 87.77% respectively; non-vital teeth was 74.67% & 75.00% respectively; and in all root filled teeth was 0%. Tooth and finger oxygen saturation values showed strong positive relationship in vital primary or permanent teeth and; no correlation in untreated non-vital primary or permanent teeth. The accuracy rate of thermal pulp test and pulse oximetry was 100% and for electrical pulp test it was 90% for permanent and 86.67% for primary teeth. Conclusion: The CPO tested in this study proved to be a valuable adjunct for diagnosing pulp vitality by objective means.

Pulp vitality; Pulp test; Pulse oximeter

1. Bruno K, Barletta F, Felippe W, Silva J, Goncalves de Alencar A, Estrela

C. Oxygen saturation in dental pulp of permanent teeth: a critical review J Endod ;40(8):1054-1057. 2014.

2. Ricucci D, Loghin S, Siqueira J. Correlation between clinical and histologic pulp diagnoses. J Endod ;40(12):1932- 1939. 2014.

3. Pathak S, Bansode P, Ahire C. PRF as a pulpotomy medicament in permanent molar with pulpitis: a case report. J Dent Med Sci;13(14):5-9. 2014.

4. Solomon R, Faizuddin U, Karunakar P, Sarvani G, Soumya S. Coronal pulpotomy technique analysis as an alternative to pulpectomy for preserving the tooth vitality, in the context of tissue regeneration: a correlated clinical study across 4 adult permanent molars. Case Rep Dent:1-12. 2015.

5. Emshoff R, Emshoff I, Moschen E, Strobl H. Laser doppler flowmetry of luxated permanent incisors: a receiver operator characteristic analysis. J Oral Rehab.;31:866-872. 2004.

6. Siddheswaran V, Adyanthaya R, Shivanna V. Pulse Oximety: a diagnostic instrument in pulpal vitality testing – An in vivo study. World J Dent;2(3):225-230. 2011.

7. Radhakrishna S, Munshi AK, Hegde AM. Pulse Oximetry: a diagnostic instrument in pulpal vitality testing. J Clin Pediatr Dent;26:141-145. 2002.

8. Gopikrishna V, Kandaswamy D, Gupta T. Assessment of the efficacy of an indigeniously developed pulse oximeter dental sensor holder for pulp vitality testing. Ind J Dent Res;17(3):111-113. 2006.

9. Gopikrishna V, Tinagupta K, Kandaswamy D. Comparison of electrical, thermal, and pulse oximetry methods for assessing pulp vitality in recently traumatized teeth. J Endod.;33(5):531-535. 2007.

10. Setzer F, Kataoka S, Natrielli F, Caldeira C. Clinical diagnosis of pulp inflammation based on pulp oxygenation rates measured by pulse oximetry. J Endod;38(7):880-883. 2012.

11. Vaghela D, Sinha A. Pulse oximetry and laser doppler flowmetry for diagnosis of pulpal vitality. J Interdiscip Dent;1(1):14-21. 2011.

12. Ciobanu G, Ion I, Ungureanu L. Testing of pulp vitality by pulse oximetry;2(2);94-98. 2012.

13. Gopikrishna V, Tinagupta K, Kandaswamy D. Evaluation of efficacy of a new custom made pulse oximeter dental probe in comparison with the electrical and thermal tests for assessing pulp vitality. J Endod;33(4):411-414. 2007.

14. Dastmalchi N, Jafarzadeb H, Moradi S. Comparison of the efficacy of a custom-made pulse oximeter probe with digital electric pulp tester, cold spray, and rubber cup for assessing pulp vitality. J Endod;38(9):1182-1186. 2012.

15. Pupim D, Filho L, Takeshita W, Iwaki LC. Evaluation of accuracy of portable fingertip pulse oximeter, as compared to that of a hospital oximeter with digital sensor. Ind J Dent Res;24(5):542-546. 2013.

16. Pozzobon M, Vieira R, Alves A, Carmona J, Teixeira C, De Souza B, Felippe W. Assessment of pulp blood flow in primary and permanent teeth using pulse oximetry. Dent Traumatol;27:184-188. 2011.

17. Bargrizan M, Ashari M A, Ahmadi M, Ramezani J. The use of pulse oximetry in evaluation of pulp vitality in immature permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol;32:43-47. 2016.

18. Calil E, Caldeira L, Gavini G, Lemos E M. Determination of pulp vitality in vivo with pulse oximetry. Int. Endod J;41:741-746. 2008.

19. Goho C. Pulse oximetry evaluation of vitality in primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent.;21(2):125-127. 1999.

20. Jurban A. Pulse Oximetry. Crit Care;3(2):11-17. 1999.

21. Schnettler JM, Wallace JA. Pulse oximetry as a diagnostic tool of pulpal vitality. J Endod 1991;17:488-90.

22. Wong JK. Pulse Oximetry: technology and critical uses. Ont Dent:22-27. 2016.

23. Batchelder PB, Raley DM. Maximizing the laboratory setting for testing devices and understanding statistical output in pulse oximetry. Anesth Analg; 105:S85-94. 2007.