Article Data

  • Views 2454
  • Dowloads 947

Original Research

Open Access

Effect of Virtual Reality Distraction on Pain and Anxiety During Dental Treatment in 5 to 8 Year Old Children

  • Vabitha Shetty1,*,
  • Lekshmi R Suresh2
  • Amitha M Hegde1

1Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore

2Department of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet, Coorg, Karnataka

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-43.2.5 Vol.43,Issue 2,March 2019 pp.97-102

Published: 01 March 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): Vabitha Shetty E-mail: docvabitha29@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective: This study was aimed at assessing the impact of Virtual Reality (VR) distraction technique on pain and anxiety in 5–8-year-old children, during short invasive dental procedures. Study design: 120 children, aged 5–8 years, scoring less than 25 on the SCARED questionnaire, scheduled to undergo short invasive dental procedures, were randomly divided into a control (without VR distraction) and study group (with VR distraction) of 60 each. State anxiety levels were assessed in the children from both groups using revised version of Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale, before and after dental treatment. Pain perceived during treatment was assessed using Wong Baker Faces pain rating scale at the end of treatment. Salivary cortisol levels were also assessed before, during and after the dental procedure, in all children. Results: We observed a significant reduction in pain perception and state anxiety in children, using VR distraction (p<0.001, p=0.002). The decrease in salivary cortisol levels was significantly greater in children using VR distraction (p<0.001). Conclusion: Virtual Reality distraction can be used as a successful behavior modification method in children undergoing short invasive dental treatments

Keywords

Pain perception; Salivary cortisol; Anxiety; Virtual reality

Cite and Share

Vabitha Shetty,Lekshmi R Suresh,Amitha M Hegde. Effect of Virtual Reality Distraction on Pain and Anxiety During Dental Treatment in 5 to 8 Year Old Children. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2019. 43(2);97-102.

References

1. Hosey M. Managing anxious children: the use of conscious sedation in paediatric dentistry. Int J Paediatr Dent. 12(5): 359-372, 2002

2. Locker D, Liddell A, Shapiro D. Diagnostic categories of dental anxiety: a population-based study. Behav Res Ther. 37(1): 25-37, 1999.

3. Kanegane K, Penha SS, Borsatti MA, Rocha RG. Dental anxiety in an emergency dental service. Rev Saude Publica. 37(6): 786-792, 2003.

4. Marwah N, Raju O, Prabhakar A. A comparison between audio and audiovisual distraction techniques in managing anxious pediatric dental patients. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 25(4): 177-182, 2007.

5. Wismeijer A, Vingerhoets A. The use of virtual reality and audiovisual eyeglass systems as adjunct analgesic techniques: A review of the literature. Ann Behav Med. 30(3): 268-278, 2005.

6. Aminabadi A, Erfanparast L, Sohrabi A, Naghili A. The Impact of Virtual Reality Distraction on Pain and Anxiety during Dental Treatment in 4- 6-Year-Old Children: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 6(4): 117-124, 2011.

7. Slifer KJ, Tucker CL, Dahlquist LM. Helping children and caregivers cope with repeated invasive procedures: How are you doing?. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 9(2):131-152, 2002.

8. Leventhal H. I know distraction works even though it doesn’t!. Health Psychology. 11(4):208-209,1992.

9. Ship I, White C. Physiologic response to dental stress. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 13(3): 368-376, 1960.

10. Edmondson H, Roscoe B, Vickers M. Biochemical Evidence of Anxiety in Dental Patients. BMJ. 4(5831): 7-9, 1972.

11. Shannon IL, Isbell GM, Prigmore JR, Hester WR. Stress in dental patients: II. The serum free 17-hydroxycorticosteroid response in routinely appointed patients undergoing simple exodontia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 15(9): 1142-1146, 1962.

12. Dembo JB, Falace DA. Salivary cortisol and the stress response in dental students. J Dent Educ. 56: 51, 1992.

13. Walker R, Fernando SA, Barker GR, Walker RF. Salivary cortisol levels before and after dental treatment. J Dent Res. 71: 741, 1992.

14. Takai N, Yamaguchi M, Aragaki T, Eto K, Uchihashi K, Nishikawa Y. Effect of psychological stress on the salivary cortisol and amylase levels in healthy young adults. Arch Oral Biol. 49(12): 963-968, 2004.

15. Sapolsky R, Krey L, McEwen B. The Neuroendocrinology of Stress and Aging: The Glucocorticoid Cascade Hypothesis*. Endocr Rev. 7(3): 284-301, 1986.

16. al’Absi M, Arnett D. Adrenocortical responses to psychological stress and risk for hypertension. Biomed Pharmacother. 54(5): 234-244, 2000.

17. Kirschbaum C, Hellhammer D. Salivary cortisol in psychoneuroendocrine research: Recent developments and applications. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 19(4): 313-333, 1994.

18. Schmidt N. Salivary Cortisol Testing in Children. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 20(3): 183-190, 1997.

19. Padmanabhan V, Rai K, Hegde A. Stress responses in children during endodontic treatment. J Paediatr Dent. 1(1): 14, 2013.

20. Miller C, Dembo J, Falace D, Kaplan A. Salivary cortisol response to dental treatment of varying stress. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 79(4): 436-441, 1995.

21. Home–Wong-Baker FACES® [Internet]. Wong-Baker FACES®. 2016 [cited 8 April 2016]. Available from: http://www.WongBakerFACES.org.

22. McCarthy A, Hanrahan K, Kleiber C, Zimmerman M, Lutgendorf S, Tsalikian E. Normative salivary cortisol values and responsivity in children. Appl Nurs Res. 22(1): 54-62, 2009.

23. Shahrbanian S, Ma X, Aghaei N, Korner-Bitensky N, Moshiri K, Simmonds MJ. Use of virtual reality (immersive vs. non-immersive) for pain management in children and adults: A systematic review of evidence from randomized controlled trials. Eur J Exp Biol. 2(5): 1408-1422, 2012.

24. Dahlquist L, Weiss K, Dillinger Clendaniel L, Law E, Ackerman C, McKenna K. Effects of Videogame Distraction using a Virtual Reality Type Head-Mounted Display Helmet on Cold Pressor Pain in Children. J Pediatr Psychol. 34(5): 574-584, 2008.

25. Sullivan C, Schneider PE, Musselman RJ, Dummett Jr CO, Gardiner D. The effect of virtual reality during dental treatment on child anxiety and behavior. ASDC J Dent Child. 67(3): 193-196, 1999.

26. Nilsson S, Finnstrom B, Kokinsky E, Enskar K. The use of Virtual Reality for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents in a paediatric oncology unit. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 13(2):102-109,2009.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top