Article Data

  • Views 1509
  • Dowloads 451

Reviews

Open Access

Dentinogenesis Imperfecta Type II in Children: A Scoping Review

  • Arturo Garrocho-Rangel1
  • Irma Dávila-Zapata1
  • Ricardo Martínez-Rider1
  • Socorro Ruiz-Rodríguez1,*,
  • Amaury Pozos-Guillén2

1Pediatric Dentistry Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Dentistry, San Luis Potosi University, San Luis Potosí, SLP, México

2Basic Sciences Laboratory, Faculty of Dentistry, San Luis Potosi University, San Luis Potosí, SLP, México

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-43.3.1 Vol.43,Issue 3,May 2019 pp.147-154

Published: 01 May 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): Socorro Ruiz-Rodríguez E-mail: msruiz@uaslp.mx

Abstract

Dentinogenesis Imperfecta type II (DI2), also known as hereditary opalescent dentin, is one of the most common genetic disorders affecting the structure of dentin, not related with osteogenesis imperfecta, which involves both primary and permanent dentitions. The purpose of this article is to perform a scoping review of the published peer-reviewed literature (1986–2017) on DI2 management in children and to outline the most relevant clinical findings extracted from this review. Forty four articles were included in the present scoping review. According to the extracted data, the following are the most important tasks to be performed in clinical pediatric dentistry: to re-establish the oral mastication, esthetics, and speech, and the development of vertical growth of alveolar bone and facial muscles; to reduce the tendency to develop caries, periapical lesions and pain; to preserve vitality, form, and size of the dentition; to avoid interfering with the eruption process of permanent teeth; to decrease the risk of tooth fractures and occlusion disturbances; to return the facial profile to a more normal appearance; and to prevent or treat possible temporomandibular joint problems. Therefore, Pediatric Dentists should bear in mind that early diagnosis and treatment, together a long-term follow-up of DI2 in children, continue to be the best approaches for achieving enhanced patient psychological well-being and, in consequence, their quality of life.

Keywords

Dentinogenesis Imperfecta Type II; Management; Children; Scoping review

Cite and Share

Arturo Garrocho-Rangel,Irma Dávila-Zapata,Ricardo Martínez-Rider,Socorro Ruiz-Rodríguez,Amaury Pozos-Guillén. Dentinogenesis Imperfecta Type II in Children: A Scoping Review. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2019. 43(3);147-154.

References

1. Barron MJ, McDonell ST, Mackie I, Dixon MJ. Hereditary dentine disorders: Dentinogenesis imperfecta and dentine dysplasia. Orphanet J Rare Dis; 3: 31, 2008.

2. Khot K, Madne S, Deshmane S, Bagri-Manjrekar K, Warke D. Dentinogenesis imperfecta type 2: A case report. J Dent Med Res; 1: 72–75, 2015.

3. Witkop CJ Jr. Manifestations of genetic diseases in the human pulp. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 32: 278–316, 1971.

4. Hodge HC, Lose GB, Finn B. Correlated clinical and structural study of hereditary opalescent dentin. J Dent Res; 15: 316–317, 1936.

5. Kamboj M, Chandra A. Dentinogenesis imperfecta type II: An affected family saga. J Oral Sci; 49: 241–244, 2007.

6. Subramaniam P, Mathew S, Sugani SN. Dentinogenesis imperfecta: A case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prevent Dent; 26: 85–87, 2008.

7. Beighton P. Familial dentinogenesis imperfecta, blue sclerae, and wormian bones without fractures: Another type of osteogenesis imperfecta? J Med Gen; 18: 124–128, 1981.

8. Bhandari S, Pannu K. Dentinogenesis imperfecta: A review and case report of a fimily over four generations. Indian J Dent Res; 19: 357–361, 2008.

9. Opsahl-Vital S, Gaucher C, Bardet C, Rowe PS, George A, Linglart A, Chausain C. Tooth dentin defects reflect disorders affecting bone mineralization. Bone; 50: 989–997, 2012.

10. Scarel-Caminaga RM, Cavalcante LB, Finoti LS, dos Santos MC, Konishi MF, dos Santos-Pinto L. Dentinogenesis imperfecta type II: Approach for dental treatment. Rev Odontol UNESP; 41: 433–437, 2012.

11. Mori-Ubaldini AL, Caldas-Giorgi MC, Borges-Carvalho A, Miori-Pascon F, Leite-Lima DAN, Marchi-Baron GM, Sartini-Paulillo LAM, Baggio-Aguilar FH. Adhesive restoration as an esthetic solution in dentinogenesis imperfecta. J Dent Child; 82: 171–175, 2015.

12. Cassia A, Aoun G, El-Outa A, Pasquet G, Cavézian R. Prevalence of dentinogenesis in a French population. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 7:116–119, 2017.

13. Güven S, Demirci F, Tanik A, Koparai M. Proesthetic treatment in dentinogenesis imperfecta type II: A case report. Acta Odontol Turcica; 33: 86–90, 2016.

14. Sapir S, Shapira J. Dentinogenesis imperfecta: An early treatment strategy. Pediatr Dent; 23: 232–237, 2001.

15. Henke DA, Fridich TA, Aquilino SA. Occlusal rehabilitation of a patient with dentinogenesis imperfecta: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent; 81: 503–506, 1999.

16. Gallusi G, Libonati A, Campanella V. SEM-morphology in dentinogenesis imperfecta type II: Microscopic anatomy and efficacy of a dentine bonding system. Eur J Paediatr Dent; 7: 9–17, 2006.

17. Tanaka T, Murakami T. Radiological features of hereditary opalescent dentin. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 27: 251–253, 1998.

18. Shields ED, Bixler D, El-Kafrawy AM. A proposal classification for heritable human dentin defects with a description of a new entity. Arch Oral Biol; 18: 543–553, 1973.

19. Leal CT, Martins LD, Verli FD, de Souza MAL, Ramos-Jorge ML. Case report: Clinical, histological and ultraestructural characterization of type II dentinogenesis imperfecta. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 11: 306–309, 2010.

20. Abukabbos H, Al-Sineedi. Clinical manifestations and dental management of dentinogenesis imperfecta associated with osteogenesis imper-fecta: Case report. Saudi Dent J; 25: 159–165, 2013.

21. de La Dure-Molla M, Philippe-Fournier B, Berdal A. Isolated dentinogenesis imperfecta and dentin dysplasia: revision of the classification. Eur J Hum Genet; 23: 445–451, 2015.

22. Singh M, Singh S. Hereditary opalescent dentin – A case report. J Indian Soc Ped Prev Dent; 22: 144–147, 2004.

23. Takagi Y, Sasaki S. A probable common disturbance in the early stage of odontoblast differentiation in dentinogenesis imperfect type 1 and type 2. J Oral Pathol; 17: 208–212, 1988.

24. Huth K, Paschos E, Sagner T, Hickel R. Diagnostic features and pedodontic-orthodontic management in dentinogenesis imperfecta type II: A case report. Int J Paediatr Dent; 12: 316–321, 2002.

25. Malmgren B, Lindskog S. Assessment of dysplastic dentin in osteogenesis imperfecta and dentinogenesis imperfecta. Acta Odontol Scand; 61: 72–80, 2003.

26. Holappa H, Nieminen P, Tolva L, Lukinmaa PL, Alaluusua S. Splicing site mutations in dentin sialophosphoprotein causing dentinogenesis imperfecta type II. Eur J Oral Sci; 114: 381–384, 2006.

27. Kim JW, Simmer JP. Hereditary dentin defects. J Dent Res; 86: 392–399, 2007.

28. Lee SK, Hu JC, Lee KE, Simmer JP, Kim J-W. A dentin sialophosphoprotein mutation that partially disrupts a splice acceptor site causes type II dentin dysplasia. J Endod; 34: 1470–1473, 2008.

29. Devaraju D, Yashoda-Devi BK, Vasudevan V, Manjunath V. Dentinogenesis imperfecta type I: A case report with literature review on nomenclature system. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 18: S131–S134, 2014.

30. Silva-Moreira KM, Silva CA, Drugowick RM, Petterossi-Imparato JC, Braga-Reis J. Oral rehabilitation of a child with dentinogenesis imperfecta – case report. RSBO; 12: 311–315, 2015.

31. Delgado AC, Ruiz M, Alarcón JA, González E. Dentinogenesis imper-fecta: The importance of early treatment. Quintessence Int; 257–263, 2008.

32. Bouvier D, Leheis B, Duprez JP, Bittar E, Coudert JL. Dentinogen-esis imperfecta: Long-term rehabilitation in a child. Pediatr Dent; 75: 192–196, 2008.

33. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Method; 8: 19–32, 2005.

34. Schneidman E, Wilson S, Spuller RL. Complete overlay dentures for the pediatric patient: case reports. Pediatr Dent; 10: 222–225, 1988.

35. Darendeliler-Kaba A, Maréchaux SC. Hereditary dentinogenesis imperfecta: A treatment program using an overdenture. ASDC J Dent Child; 59: 273–276, 1992.

36. Mayordomo FG, Estrela F, de Aldecoa EA. Dentinogenesis imperfecta: A case report. Quintessence Int; 23: 795–802, 1992.

37. Raji MA, Vargheese NO, Grorge K. Dentinogenesis imperfecta. Report of three cases in an Indian family. Indian J Dent Res; 4: 59–64, 1993.

38. Cehreli ZC, Altay N. Dentinogenesis imperfecta: Influence of an overdenture on gingival tissues and tooth mobility. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 20: 277–280, 1996.

39. Joshi N, Parkash H. Oral rehabilitation in dentinogenesis imperfecta with overdentures: Case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 22: 99–102, 1998.

40. Singh M, Singh S. Hereditary opalescent dentin – A case report. J Indian Soc Ped Prev Dent; 22: 144–147, 2004.

41. Shetty N, Joseph M, Basnet P, Dixit S. An integrated treatment approach: A case report for dentinogenesis imperfecta type II. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 5: 230–233, 2007.

42. Millet C, Viennot S, Duprez JP. Case report: Rehabilitation of a child with dentinogenesis imperfecta and congenitally lateral incisors. Eur J Paediatr Dent; 11: 256–260, 2011.

43. Rafeek RN, Paryag A, Al-Bayaty. Management of dentinogenesis imperfecta: A review of two case reports. Gen Dent; 61: 72–76, 2013.

44. Surendra P, Shah R, Roshan NM, Reddy VS. Dentinogenesis imperfecta: A family which was affected for over three generations. J Clin Diag Res; 7: 1808–1811, 2013.

45. Min B, Song JS, Lee JH, Choi B, Kim KM, Kim SO. Multiple teeth fractures in dentinogenesis imperfecta: A case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 38: 362–365, 2014.

46. Akhlaghi N, Eshghi AR, Mohamadpour M. Dental management of a child with dentinogenesis imperfecta: A case report. J Dent (Teheran); 13: 133–138, 2016.

47. Beltrame AP, Rosa MM, Noschang RA, Almeida IC. Early rehabilitation of incisors with dentinogenesis imperfecta type II–case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 41: 112–115, 2017.

48. Gama FJR, Correa IS, Valerio CS, Ferreira EF, Manzi FR. Dentinogenesis imperfecta type II: A case report with 17 years of follow-up. Imaging Sci Dent; 47: 129–133, 2017.

49. Ierardo G, Luzzi V, Nardacci G, Vozza I, Polimeni A. Minimally invasive orthodontics: Elastodontic therapy in a growing patient affected by dentinogenesis imperfecta. Ann Stomatol (Roma); 8: 34–38, 2017.

50. Siar CH. Quantitative histological analysis of the human coronal dentine in dentinogenesis imperfecta types I and II. Arch Oral Biol; 31: 387–390, 1986.

51. Lukinmaa PL, Allemanni G, Waltimo J, Zardi L. Immunoreactivity of tenascin-C in dentin matrix in dentinogenesis imperfecta associated with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Dent Res; 75: 581–587, 1996.

52. Kim JW, Nam SH, Jang KT, Lee SH, Kim CC, Hahn SH, Hu JC, Simmer JP. A novel splice acceptor mutation in the DSPP gene causing dentinogenesis imperfecta type II. Hum Genet; 115: 248–254, 2004.

53. Li F, Liu Y, Liu H, Yang J, Zhang F, Feng H. Phenotype and genotype analyses in seven families with dentinogenesis imperfecta or dentin dysplasia. Oral Dis; 23: 360–366, 2017.

54. Harley KE, Ibbetson RJ. Dental anomalies—are adhesive castings the solution? Br Dent J; 174: 15–22, 1993.

55. Malgrem B, Lundberg M, Lindskog S. Dentinogenesis imperfecta in a six-generation family. A clinical, radiographic and histologic comparison of two branches through three generations. Swed Dent J; 12: 73–84, 1988

56. Kantaputra PN. Dentinogenesis imperfecta – Associated syndromes. Am J Med Gen; 104: 75–78, 2001.

57. De Coster PJ. Dentin disorders: Anomalies of dentin formation and structure. Endod Topics; 21:41–61, 2009.

58. Neeti B. Dentinogenesis imperfecta – “A hereditary developmental disturbance of dentin”. Internet J Pediatr Neonatol; 13: 1–6, 2010.

59. Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD. Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. Brit Med J; 323: 101–105, 2001.

60. Daudt HML, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Method; 13: 48–56, 2013.

61. Garg AX, Hackam D, Tonelli M. Systematic review and meta-analysis: When one study is just not enough. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 3: 253–260, 2008.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top