Effect of Three Behavior Guidance Techniques on Anxiety Indicators of Children Undergoing Diagnosis and Preventive Dental Care

Objective(s): To assess the effect of three behavior guidance techniques on anxiety indicators of children undergoing diagnosis and preventive dental care. Study Design: Sixty-three subjects (7–9 years) were divided into three groups as per the behavior guidance technique namely tell-show-do, live and filmed modeling (using Tablet Computer) to receive diagnostic (Oral examination & radiographic assessment using intraoral periapical radiographs) and preventive dental care (Oral prophylaxis and topical fluoride application). Anxiety indicators–Facial Image Scale (FIS) scores and heart rate were recorded before, during and after diagnosis/preventive treatment. Three-way repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc analysis was performed at significance of p-value < 0.05. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the anxiety indicators of children under the influence of different behavior guidance approaches undergoing diagnosis/preventive treatments except for mean heart rate of children while oral examination. Multiple comparison results reveal that the mean FIS scores and heart rate of children with modeling techniques were significantly better as compared to tell-show-do technique with no significant difference between the two modeling techniques. Conclusion: This study suggests that the modeling techniques (filmed and live) seem to be an efficient behavioral guidance approach for children aged 7–9 years undergoing routine diagnosis and preventive dental care as compared to tell-show-do technique.

Behavior; Children; Dental anxiety; Dental care

1. Cohen MM, Cameron CB. Should you cancel the operation when a child has an upper respiratory tract infection? Anesth Analg. 72: 282–8, 1991.

2. Muhammad S, Shyama M, Al-Mutawa SA. Parental attitude toward behavioral management techniques in dental practice with schoolchildren in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract. 20: 350–5, 2011.

3. Bandura A, Menlove FL. Factors determining vicarious extinction of avoidance behaviour through symbolic modeling. J Pers Soc Psychol. 8: 99–108, 1968.

4. Greenbaum PE, Melamed BG. Pretreatment modeling. A technique for reducing children’s fear in the dental operatory. Dent Clin North Am. 32: 693–704, 1988.

5. Sakthivel R, Poornima V, Jayanthi M, Reddy VN, Selvaraju G, Sakthivel MR. Evaluation of Anxiety and the Effect of Modeling in Children undergoing Orthopantomographic Examination. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 25: 274–7, 2013.

6. Sharath A, Rekka P, Muthu MS, Rathna Prabhu V, Sivakumar N. Children’s behavior pattern and behavior management techniques used in a structured postgraduate dental program. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 27: 22–6, 2009.

7. Veerkamp JS, Wright GZ. Children’s Behaviour in the Dental Office. In: Wright GZ, Kupietzky A. Behaviour management in dentistry for children. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford; 2014. p. 26.

8. Lee C, Chang Y, Huang S. Prevalence of Dental Anxiety among 5‐to 8‐Year‐Old Taiwanese Children. J Public Health Dent. 67: 36–41, 2007.

9. Klingberg G, Broberg AG. Dental fear/anxiety and dental behaviour management problems in children and adolescents: A review of prevalence and concomitant psychological factors. Int J Paediatr Dent. 17: 391–406, 2007.

10. Sharma R, Mahajan N, Thakur S, Kotwal B. Behaviour management strategies in treating children with dental fear. Indian J Dent Sci. 6: 131–4, 2014.

11. Mungara J, Injeti M, Joseph E, Elangovan A, Sakthivel R. Child ’ s dental fear : Cause related factors and the in fl uence of audiovisual modeling. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 31: 215–20, 2013.

12. Melamed BG, Weinstein D, Hawes R, Katin-Borland M. Reduction of fear-related dental management problems with use of filmed modeling. J Am Dent Assoc. 90: 4–8, 1975.

13. Buchanan H, Niven N. Further evidence for the validity of the Facial Image Scale. Int J Paediatr Dent. 13: 368–9, 2003.