Assessing the Effect of Low Calorie Soda Beverages on Primary Tooth Enamel: An In Vitro Study

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of low calorie soda beverages on the enamel of primary teeth. Study Design: Fifty enamel slabs were prepared from twenty primary extracted teeth and were equally divided into five groups: a) 0.9% NaCl (Control), b) Coca-Cola Classic (Sucrose), c) Diet Coke (Aspartame), d) Zevia Cola (Erythritol), e) Coca-Cola Life (Stevia). Each specimen was exposed to the beverage for a total of sixty minutes. Enamel surface roughness was measured before and after the exposures using a LEXT OLS4000 3D Laser Measuring Microscope. Results: All tested sodas resulted to a statistically significant change on the surface roughness of the enamel (p =.000). However, this effect did not differ significantly between the different treatment groups (p =.103). Conclusions: Both regular soda and low calorie soda containing different commercial sweeteners appear to have an effect on the surface morphology of primary tooth enamel. Thus, it is important to discourage the intake of any type of soda as part of the dietary advice provided in the dental office.

Low calorie soda beverages; Primary tooth enamel; Erosion, Dental caries

1. West NX, Joiner A. Enamel mineral loss. J Dent 42 Suppl 1: S2-11, 2014.

2. Sohn W, Burt BA, Sowers MR. Carbonated soft drinks and dental caries in the primary dentition. J Dent Res 85: 262-6, 2006.

3. French SA, Lin BH, Guthrie JF. National trends in soft drink consumption among children and adolescents age 6 to 17 years: prevalence, amounts, and sources, 1977/1978 to 1994/1998. J Am Diet Assoc 103: 1326-31, 2003.

4. Han E, Powell LM. Consumption patterns of sugar-sweetened beverages in the United States. J Acad Nutr Diet 113: 43-53, 2013.

5. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA 311: 806-14, 2014.

6. Giacaman RA, Campos P, Munoz-Sandoval C, Castro RJ. Cariogenic potential of commercial sweeteners in an experimental biofilm caries model on enamel. Arch Oral Biol 58: 1116-22, 2013.

7. Shankar P, Ahuja S, Sriram K. Non-nutritive sweeteners: review and update. Nutrition 29: 1293-9, 2013.

8. Goyal SK, Samsher, Goyal RK. Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) a bio-sweetener: a review. Int J Food Sci Nutr 61: 1-10, 2010.

9. Roberts MW, Wright JT. Nonnutritive, low caloric substitutes for food sugars: clinical implications for addressing the incidence of dental caries and overweight/obesity. Int J Dent 2012: 625701, 2012.

10. Sylvetsky AC, Welsh JA, Brown RJ, Vos MB. Low-calorie sweetener consumption is increasing in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 96: 640-6, 2012.

11. Gupta C, Prakash D, Gupta S, Goyal S. Role of Low Calorie Sweeteners in Maintaining Dental Health. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 11: 342- 346, 2012.

12. Kitchens M, Owens BM. Effect of carbonated beverages, coffee, sports and high energy drinks, and bottled water on the in vitro erosion characteristics of dental enamel. J Clin Pediatr Dent 31: 153-9, 2007.

13. Kwon SR, Kurti SR, Oyoyo U, Li Y. Effect of various tooth whitening modalities on microhardness, surface roughness and surface morphology of the enamel. Odontology 103: 274-9, 2015.

14. Kulthanan K, Nuchkull P, Varothai S. The pH of water from various sources: an overview for recommendation for patients with atopic dermatitis. Asia Pac Allergy 3: 155-60, 2013.