Article Data

  • Views 699
  • Dowloads 177

Original Research

Open Access

Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effects of Different Mouthrinses against Streptococcus Mutans: An in Vitro Study

  • Eman Abu-obaid1
  • Fouad Salama1,*,
  • Ala’a Abu-obaid2
  • Fars Alanazi3
  • Mounir Salem3
  • Sayed Auda3

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

2Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

3Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-43.6.7 Vol.43,Issue 6,October 2019 pp.398-407

Published: 01 October 2019

*Corresponding Author(s): Fouad Salama E-mail: fspdkids@gmail.com

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the antimicrobial effects of different natural and semi-natural mouthrinses on isolates of S. mutans obtained from the saliva of Saudi children and reference strains of S mutans (ATCC 25175). Study design: Saliva samples were collected from 20 children. Natural and semi-natural mouthrinses included were herbal mix mouthrinse, cranberry mouthrinse, chlorhexidine digluconate mouthrinse, cranberry extract mixed with chlorhexidine digluconate mouthrinse, chlorhexidine digluconate mouthrinse with alcohol (positive control), and distilled water (negative control). The microbiological examination tests were minimal inhibitory concentration, minimal bactericidal concentration, and zone of inhibition for the saliva isolates of S. mutans while zone of inhibition test only for reference strain of S. mutans. Results: For reference strain in a comparison with the distilled water, the herbal mix, cranberry, cranberry mixed with chlorhexidine, chlorhexidine, and chlorhexidine with alcohol showed significantly increased zones of inhibition by 36.38, 36.25, 26.13, 17.75, and 12.38, respectively. For saliva isolates in a comparison with the distilled water, the herbal mix, cranberry, cranberry mixed with chlorhexidine, chlorhexidine, and chlorhexidine with alcohol showed significantly increased zones of inhibition by 38.00, 34.25, 22.94, 16.50, and 16.44, respectively. Chlorhexidine with alcohol showed significantly lower minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentration than the other groups. Conclusions: Herbal mix and cranberry mouthrinses could be effective natural alternative to chlorhexidine mouthrinse with or without alcohol in affecting tested parameters.


Keywords

Chlorhexidine; Cranberry; Herbal; Mouthrinses; Streptococcus Mutans

Cite and Share

Eman Abu-obaid,Fouad Salama,Ala’a Abu-obaid,Fars Alanazi,Mounir Salem,Sayed Auda. Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effects of Different Mouthrinses against Streptococcus Mutans: An in Vitro Study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2019. 43(6);398-407.

References

1. Yadav K, Prakash S. Dental Caries: A Review’, Asian Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences;53(6):1–7.2. 2016.

2. Selwitz R, Ismail A, Pitts N. Dental caries. The Lancet;369(9555): 51–59. 2007.

3. Chandki R, Banthia P, Banthia R. Biofilms: a microbial home. J Indian Soc Periodontol;15(2):111–114. 2011.

4. Hamada S, Slade H. Biology, immunology, and cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiological reviews;44(2):331–384. 1980.

5. Sharma U, Jain RL, Pathak A. A clinical assessments of effectiveness of mouthwashes in comparison to toothbrushing in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent ;22:38–44. 2004.

6. Van der Weijden FA, Van der Sluijs E, Ciancio SG, Slot DE. Can Chemical Mouthwash Agents Achieve Plaque/Gingivitis Control? Dent Clin North Am;59(4):799-829. 2015.

7. James P, Worthington HV, Parnell C, Harding M, Lamont T, Cheung A, Whelton H, Riley P. Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev;3:CD008676. 2017.

8. Fltötra L, Gjermo P, Rölla G, Waerhaug J. Side effects of chlorhexidine mouth washes. Scand J Dent Res;79(2):119–125. 1971.

9. Ernst C, Canbek K, Dillenburger A, Willershausen B. Clinical study on the effectiveness and side effects of hexetidine and chlorhexidine mouthrinses versus a negative control. Quintessence international;36(8):641–652. 2005.

10. Groppo F, Bergamaschi C, Cogo K, Franz-Montan M, Motta RH, de Andrade ED. Use of phytotherapy in dentistry. Phytother Res;22(8):993– 998.11. 2008.

11. Newman D. Natural products as drug leads: an old process or the new hope for drug discovery? J Medicinal Chem;51(9):589–2599. 2008.

12. Bonifait L, Grenier D. Cranberry Polyphenols : Potential Benefits for Dental Caries and Periodontal Disease. J Can Dent Assos;76:a130. 2010.

13. Khairnar M, Karibasappa G, Dodamani A, Vishwakarma P, Naik R, Deshmukh M. Comparative assessment of Cranberry and Chlorhexidine mouthwash on streptococcal colonization among dental students: A randomized parallel clinical trial. Contemporary Clin dent; 6(1): 35–39. 2015.

14. Neto C. Cranberry and It’s Phytochemicals: A Review of In Vitro Anticancer Studies. J Nut;137:186S-193S. 2007,

15. Srinidhi K. Cranberry and its Antibacterial Activity–A Review. J Pharm Sci & Res;6(1):41 – 44. 2014.

16. Viuda-Martos M, Fernández-Lóaez J, Pérez-álvarez J. Pomegranate and its Many Functional Components as Related to Human Health: A Review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety; 9(6): 635–654. 2010.

17. Umar D, Dilshad B, Farhan M, Ali A, Baroudiet K. The effect of pomegranate mouthrinse on Streptococcus mutans count and salivary pH: An in vivo study. J Adv Pharm Technol Res;7(1):13-16. 2016.

18. Sambawa Z, Alkahtani F, Aleanizy F, ALqahtani F. Comparison of antibacterial efficacy chlorhexidine gluconate and Saudi Myrrh mouthwashes in the oral cavity. Oriental J Chem;32(5):2605–2610. 2016.

19. Gardiner P. Complementary, holistic, and integrative medicine: chamomile. Pediatr Rev;28(4):e16– 8. 2007.

20. Pourabbasa R, Delazarb A, Chitsaza M. The Effect of German Chamomile Mouthwash on Dental Plaque and Gingival Inflammation. Iranian J Pharmaceutical Res;2:105-109. 2005.

21. Ooi LS, Li Y, Kam SL, Wang H, Wong EY, Ooi VE. Antimicrobial activities of cinnamon oil and cinnamaldehyde from the Chinese medicinal herb Cinnamomum cassia Blume. Am J Chin Med;34(3):511-22. 2006.

22. Burt S. Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods-a review. Int J Food Microbiol;94(3):223-253. 2004.

23. Al-Joubori S, Al-Obaidi W. Effect of cinnamon extracts on streptococci and mutans streptococci, in comparison to chlorhexidine gluconate. J Baghdad College Dent;23(1):141-145. 2011.

24. Frankl S, Shiere F, Fogels H. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory? J Dent Child; 29: 150-163. 1962.

25. al Ghanim NA, Adenubi JO, Wyne AA, Khan NB. Caries prediction model in pre-school children in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Int J Paediatr Dent;8(2):115–122. 1998.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

PubMed (MEDLINE) PubMed comprises more than 35 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top