Effectiveness and Safety of Nitrous Oxide as a Sedative Agent at 60% and 70% Compared to 50% Concentration in Pediatric Dentistry Setting

Objective: Sedation using 50% nitrous oxide (N2O) concentration is common in pediatric dentistry.The aim to assess sedation and cooperation levels following sedation with 60% and 70% N2O concentrations in children whose dental treatment failed using 50% N2O concentration.Study design: Children (n=51) aged 5–10 years were included. Sedation started with N2O concentration of 50%; when appropriate cooperation and sedation were not achieved, N2O concentration was increased to 60%, and subsequently to 70% during the same session. Sedation and cooperation levels were the primary outcomes. Adverse events were defined as secondary outcomes.Results: At 50% N2O concentration, five children reached adequate sedation and cooperation and completed their dental treatment, where 32 children completed the treatment at 60% N2O concentration. Fourteen children required a concentration of 70% to complete treatment. For ten of the latter, treatment was successfully completed, while for four, treatment failed, despite the achievement of adequate sedation. Adverse events were observed in 9%, 22%, of the children who received 60%, 70% N2O concentrations, respectively. Conclusions: When sedation with 50% N2O concentration does not achieve satisfactory cooperation to complete pediatric dental treatment, 60% N2O concentration appears to be more effective than 50% and safer than 70%.

Cooperation; Nitrous oxide; Pediatric dentistry; Sedative agent

1. Emmanouil DM, Quock RM. Advances in understanding the actions of nitrous oxide. Anesth Prog; 54: 9-18. 2007.

2. Malamed, Stanley F. Inhalation Sedation: Rationale. In: Stanley, F. Malamed, ed. Sedation : a Guide to Patient Management. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby Elsevier; 2010:179–189.

3. Paterson SA, Tahmassebi JF. Paediatric Dentistry in the New Millennium: 3. Use of inhalation sedation in paediatric dentistry. Dent Update;30: 350-6, 358. 2003.

4. Krauss B, Green SM. Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet;367: 766-80. 2006.

5. Babl FE, Oakley E, Seaman C, et al. High-concentration nitrous oxide for procedural sedation in children: adverse events and depth of sedation. Pediatrics;121: e528-32. 2008.

6. Zeir JL, Liu M. Safety of high concentrations of nitrous oxide by nasal mask for pediatric procedural sedation: experience with 7802 cases. Pediatr Emerg Care; 27: 1107-12. 2011.

7. Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, et al. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J; 4:656-659,. 1972.

8. Houpt MI, Limb R, Livingston RL. Clinical effects of nitrous oxide conscious sedation in children. Pediatr Dent;26: 29–36. 2004.

9. Steward DJ. A simplified scoring system for the post-operative recovery room. Can Anaesth Soc; J ;122: 111-3. 975,

10. Wilson S. A survey of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry membership: nitrous oxide and sedation. Pediatr Dent; 18: 287–93, 1996.

11. Becker DE, Rosenberg M. Nitrous oxide and the inhalation anesthetics. Anesth Prog; 55: 124-130. 2008.

12. Duarte LT, Duval Neto GF, Mendes FF. Nitrous oxide use in children. Rev Bras Anestesiol; 451-67. 62.

13. Galeotti A, Garret Bernardin A, D’Antò V, et al. Inhalation conscious sedation with nitrous oxide and oxygen as alternative to general anesthesia in precooperative, fearful, and disabled pediatric dental patients: A large survey on 688 working sessions. Biomed Res Int Article ID 7289310, 2016.

14. Kupietzky A, Tal E, Shapira J, et al. Fasting state and episodes of vomiting in children receiving nitrous oxide for dental treatment. Pediatr Dent; 30: 414-419. 2008.

15. Somri M, Parisinos CA, Kharouba J, et al. Optimizing the dose of oral midazolam sedation for dental procedures in children: a prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Int J Paediatr Dent ; 22: 271-279. 2012.