Article Data

  • Views 871
  • Dowloads 203

Reviews

Open Access

Psychological Variables in Children and Adolescents with Cleft Lip and/or Palate

  • Ana Ruiz Guillén1,*,
  • Cecilia Peñacoba1
  • Martín Romero1

1Rey Juan Carlos University. Madrid, Spain. Department of Medicine and Surgery, Public Health, Psychology and Immunology and Medical Microbiology, Nursing and Dentistry

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-44.2.9 Vol.44,Issue 2,March 2020 pp.116-122

Published: 01 March 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): Ana Ruiz Guillén E-mail: a.ruizgu.2016@alumnos.urjc.es

Abstract

Objective: This review analyzes the psychological variables most frequently studied over the last 10 years in children and adolescents with cleft lip/palate (CL/P). Such variables are assumed to be the keys to these patients' psychosocial adjustment. Study design: Articles published from January 2007 to February 2017 were retrieved from PubMed to identify the psychological variables most commonly studied in children and adolescents with CL/P, irrespective of gender or type of cleft. The search terms were “cleft palate” and “psychology”, with the operator AND. Results: Of the 324 articles retrieved, 26 met the criteria for inclusion in the review. The psychological variables most extensively studied over the years were children's social functioning, quality of life and ability to cope. Conclusion: While CL/P patients' quality of life was unanimously agreed to be affected, no consensus was found in the literature on social functioning or coping. In addition to the cleft, patient adjustment was reported to be governed by individual variables and mediators. The range of ages most frequently studied was 7 to 16.

Keywords

Cleft lip and/or palate; Psychology; Children; Adolescents

Cite and Share

Ana Ruiz Guillén,Cecilia Peñacoba,Martín Romero. Psychological Variables in Children and Adolescents with Cleft Lip and/or Palate. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2020. 44(2);116-122.

References

1. Santos Lima L, Silveira Ribeiro G, Nascimento de Aquino S,et al. Prevalence of depressive symptoms in patients with cleft lip and palate. Braz JOtorhinolaryngol, 81: 177-183, 2015.

2. Ward JA, Vig KWL, Firestone Ar, Mercado A, De Fonseca M, Johnston W. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in children with orofacial clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 50: 174-181, 2013.

3. Boes AD, Murko V, Wood JL,et al. Social function in boys with cleft lip and palate: Relationship of ventral frontal cortex morphology. Behav Brain Res, 181: 224-231, 2007.

4. Wehby GL, Moreno LM. Oral clefts and wellbeing: a lifelong perspective and an agenda for comparative effectiveness research. J Comp Eff Res, 3: 23-28, 2014.

5. Nilsson S, Merlo J, Lyberg-Ahlander V, Psouni E. Psychotropic drug use in adolescents born with an orofacial cleft: a population study. BMJ Open, 5: 1-8, 2015.

6. Sagheri D, Ravens-Sieberer V, Braumann B, Von Marchensen S. An evaluation on Health-Related Quality of Life in a group of 4-7 year-old children with cleft lip and palate. J Orofac Orthop,70: 274-284, 2009.

7. Hutchinson K, Wellman MA, Noe DA, Kahn A. The Psychosocial Effects of Cleft Lip and Palate in Non-Anglo Populations: A Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 48: 497-508, 2011.

8. Fadeyibi IO, Coker OA, Zacchariah MP, Fasawe A, Ademiluyi SA. Psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate on Nigerians: The Ikeja-Lagos experience. J Plast Surg Hand Surg, 46: 13-18, 2012.

9. Collet BR, Speltz ML. A developmental approach to mental health for children and adolescents with orofacial clefts. Orthod Craniofacial Res, 10: 138-148, 2007.

10. Klassen AF, Tsangaris E, Forrest CR et al. Quality of life of children treated for cleft lip and/or palate: A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 45: 547-557, 2012.

11. Richman LC, McCoy TE, Conrad AL, Nopoulos PC. Neuropsychological, Behavioral, and Academic Sequelae of Cleft: Early Developmental, School Age, and Adolescent/Young Adult Outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 49: 387-396, 2012.

12. Stock MN, Hammond V, Owen T, Kiff J, Shanly A, Rumsey N. “Achieving consensus in the measurement of psychological adjustment to cleft lip and/ or palate.” Cleft Palate CraniofacJ, 53: 421-426, 2016.

13. Holder MC, Davis BH, Ward WL. Comorbid psychosocial issues seen in pediatric otolaryngology clinics. Otolaryngol Clin N Am, 47: 779-794, 2014.

14. Lorot-Marchand A, Guerreschi P, Pellein P, Martinot V, Gbaguibi CC, Neiva C, Devauchelle B, Frochisse C, Poli-Merol ML, Francois-Fiquet C. Frequency and socio-psychological impact of taunting in school-age patients with cleft lip-palate surgical repair. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 79: 1041-1048, 2015.

15. Tyler MC, Wehby GL, Robbins JM, Damiano PC. Separation anxiety in children ages 4 through 9 with oral clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 50: 520-527, 2013.

16. Snyder H, Pope AW. Psychosocial adjustment in children and adolescents with a craniofacial anomaly: Diagnosis-specific patterns. Cleft Palate Craniofac Jl, 47: 264-272, 2010.

17. De Oliveira RL, Santana Santos T, Almeida Teixeira JL, Saguete Martins- Filho PR, Ferreira da Silva LC. Health-Related Quality of Life in patients with a cleft lip and/or palate. J Craniofa Surgy, 26: 2315-2319, 2015.

18. Feragen KB, Borge AIH, Rumsey N. Social experience in 10-year old children born with a cleft. Exploring psychosocial resilience. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 46: 65-74, 2009.

19. Murray L, Arteche A, Bingley C,et al. The effect of cleft lip on socio-emotional functioning in school-aged children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 50: 94-103, 2010.

20. Kramer FJ, Gruber R, Fialka F, Sinikovic B, Hahn W, Schliephake H. Quality of Life in school-age children with orofacial clefts and their families. J Craniofac Surg, 20: 2061-2066, 2009.

21. Kramer FJ, Gruber R, Fialka F, Sinikovic B, Schliephake H. Quality of Life and family functioning in children with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts ar preschool ages. J Craniofac Surg, 19: 580-587, 2008.

22. Collet BR, Cloonan YK, Speltz ML, Anderka M, Werler MM. Psychosocial functioning in children with and without orofacial clefts and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 49: 397-405, 2012.

23. Feragen KB, Borge AIH. Peer harassment and satisfaction with appearance in children with and without a facial difference. Body Image, 7: 97-105, 2010.

24. Berger ZE, Dalton LJ. Coping with a cleft II: Factors associated with psychosocial adjustment of adolescents with cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 48: 82-90, 2011.

25. Feragen KB, Stock NM, Sharratt ND, Kvalem IL. Self-perceptions of romantic appeal in adolescents with a cleft lip and/or palate. Body Image, 18: 143-152, 2016.

26. Berger ZE, Dalton LJ. Coping with a cleft: Psychosocial adjustment of adolescents with a cleft lip and palate and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 46: 435-443, 2009.

27. Feragen KB, Kvalem IL, Rumsey N, Borge AIH. Adolescents with and without a facial difference: The role of friendships and social acceptance in perceptions of appearance and emotional resilience. Body Image, 7: 271-279, 2010.

28. Broder HL, Wilson-Genderson M, Sischo L. Examination of a theoretical model for Oral Health-Related Quality of Life among youths with cleft. Am J Public Health, 104: 865-871, 2014.

29. Eslami N, Reza Majidi M, Aliakbarian M, Hasanzadeh N. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in children with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg, 24: e340-e343, 2013.

30. Piombino P, Ruggiero F, Dell´Aversana Orabona Get al. Development and validation of the Quality of Life Adolescent Cleft Questionnaire in patients with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg, 25: 1757-1761, 2014.

31. Damiano PC, Tyler MC, Romitti PA,et al. Health-Related Quality of Life among preadolescents children with oral clefts: The mother´s perspective. Pediatrics, 120: e283-e290, 2007.

32. Wehby GL, Tyler MC, Lindgren S, Romitti P, Robbins J, Damiano P. Oral clefts and behavioural health of young children. Oral Dis, 18: 74-84, 2012.

33. Bos A, Prahl C. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Dutch children with cleft lip and/or palate. Angle Orthod, 81: 865-871, 2011.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top