Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Article Menu
Export Article
More by Authors Links
Article Data
- Views 804
- Dowloads 215
Original Research
Open AccessShear Bond Strength of a Resin Composite to Six Pulp Capping
Materials Used in Primary Teeth
Shear Bond Strength of a Resin Composite to Six Pulp Capping Materials Used in Primary Teeth
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
3Department of Clinical Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Detroit Mercy, Michigan, USA
*Corresponding Author(s): Fouad Salama E-mail: salamafs@udmercy.edu
Abstract
The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the shear bond strength (SBS) and bond failure types of a resin-composite to six pulp-capping materials used in primary teeth. Study design: Eight-disc specimens from each pulp-capping material (6 groups) to bond to Filtek™ Z350 XT Flowable using a standard PVC tube (2X2mm). All groups were prepared according to the instruction of the manufacturer. The SBS was measured with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min using a universal testing machine. Failure mode evaluation was completed using Digital Microscope by two independent examiners. Results: Urbical LC® showed the highest SBS (Mean+SD) followed by ProRoot® MTA and TheraCal LC® (35.422+2.910, 22.114+2.515, and 21.175+1.983) respectively. ANOVA showed significant differences between all groups (P=0.0001). Urbical LC® and Photac™ Fil QuickAplicap™ were statistically significant different from all other pulp-capping materials groups. ProRoot® MTA was statistically significant different than Biodentine® (P=0.0001) and Photac™ Fil (P=0.0001). The total number of bond failure was recorded for cohesive B failure/cohesive in the pulp-capping material (14) and adhesive failure (14). Conclusion: Most of the tested pulp-capping materials bonded to Filtek™ Z350 XT demonstrated clinically acceptable and high SBS. Urbical LC showed the highest SBS while Biodentine® showed the lowest SBS.
Keywords
Shear Bond Strength; Pulp Capping Materials; Adhesives; Biodentine; TheraCal LC; ProRoot MTA
Cite and Share
Latifa Alhowaish,Fouad Salama,Mohammed Al-Harbi,Mohamad Abumoatti. Shear Bond Strength of a Resin Composite to Six Pulp Capping Materials Used in Primary Teeth. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2020. 44(4);234-239.
References
1. Caneppele TM, Bresciani E, Da Silva Ávila DM, Barcellos DC, Pucci CR. Effect of Lining Materials on Shear Bond Strength for Composite Restorations In Vitro. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 37(1):137-143. 2017.
2. Burrow MF, Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Messer HH. Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite—a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent. ;34(6):648-655. 2009.
3. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, Council on Clinical Affairs. Pulp Therapy for Primary and Immature Permanent Teeth. Pediatr Dent ;40(6):325-333. 2018-2019.
4. Alzraikat H, Taha NA, Qasrawi D, Burrow MF. Shear bond strength of a novel light cured calcium silicate based-cement to resin composite using different adhesive systems. Dent Mater J;35(6):881-887. 2016.
5. Deepa VL, Dhamaraju B, Bollu IP, Balaji TS. Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite bonded to three different liners: TheraCal LC, Biodentine, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement using universal adhesive: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent ;19(2):166-170. 2016.
6. Cantekin K, Avci S. Evaluation of shear bond strength of two resin-based composites and glass ionomer cement to pure tricalcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine®). J Appl Oral Sci. 2014;22(4):302-306.
7. Hegde S, Sowmya B, Mathew S, Bhandi SH, Nagaraja S, Dinesh K. Clinical evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine as direct pulp capping agents in carious teeth. J Conserv Dent;20(2):91-95. 2017.
8. Altunsoy M, Tanrıver M, Ok E, Kucukyilmaz E. Shear Bond Strength of a Self-adhering Flowable Composite and a Flowable Base Composite to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement, and Biodentine. J Endod;41(10):1691-1695. 2015.
9. Cengiz E, Ulusoy N. Microshear Bond Strength of Tri-Calcium Silicate-based Cements to Different Restorative Materials. J Adhes Dent;18(3):231-237. . 2016.
10. Kamal EM, Nabih SM, Obeid RF, Abdelhameed MA. The reparative capacity of different bioactive dental materials for direct pulp capping. Dent Med Probl. ;55(2):147-152. 2018.
11. Li X, Pedano MS, Camargo B, Hauben E, De Vleeschauwer S, Chen Z, De Munck J, Vandamme K, Van Landuyt K, Van Meerbeek B. Experimental tricalcium silicate cement induces reparative dentinogenesis. Dent Mater;34(9):1410-1423. 2018.
12. Neelakantan P, Grotra D, Subbarao CV, Garcia-Godoy F. The shear bond strength of resin-based composite to white mineral trioxide aggregate. J Am Dent Assoc;143(8):40-45. 2012.
13. Tulumbaci F, Almaz ME, Arikan V, Mutluay MS. Shear bond strength of different restorative materials to mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine. J Conserv Dent;20(5):292-296. 2017,
14. Salama F, Alahaidib F, AlShamrani M, Alhowaish L, Allam R. Bond Strength of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin Composite to Four Pulp Capping Biomaterials. IOSR J Dental Medical Sciences;16(12) 68-75. 2017.
15. Kaup M, Dammann CH, Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. Shear bond strength of Biodentine, ProRoot MTA, glass ionomer cement and composite resin on human dentine ex vivo. Head Face Med.11-14. 2015.
16. Yelamali S, Patil AC. “Evaluation of shear bond strength of a composite resin to white mineral trioxide aggregate with three different bonding systems”-An in vitro analysis. J Clin Exp Dent;8(3):273-277. 2016.
17. Triolo PT Jr, Swift EJ Jr, Barkmeier WW. Shear bond strengths of composite to dentin using six dental adhesive systems. Oper Dent.;20(2):46-50. 1995.
18. Oskoee SS1, Kimyai S, Bahari M, Motahari P, Eghbal MJ, Asgary S. Comparison of shear bond strength of calcium-enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin. J Contemp Dent Pract;12(6):457-462. 2011.
19. Atabek D, Sillelioğlu H, Olmez A. Bond strength of adhesive systems to mineral trioxide aggregate with different time intervals. J Endod;38(9):1288-1292. 2012.
20. Komabayashi T, Zhu Q, Eberhart R, Imai Y. Current status of direct pulp-capping materials for permanent teeth. Dent Mater J. ;35(1):1-12. 2016.
21. Milosevic A. Calcium hydroxide in restorative dentistry. J Dent;19(1):3- 13. . 1991. 22. Saito T, Toyooka H, Ito S, Crenshaw MA. In vitro study of remineralization of dentin: Effects of ions on mineral induction by decalcified dentin matrix. Caries Res;37:445-449. 2003.
23. Hashem DF, Foxton R, Manoharan A, Watson TF, Banerjee A. The physical characteristics of resin composite-calcium silicate interface as part of a layered/laminate adhesive restoration. Dent Mater.;30(3):343-349. 2014.
24. Raju VG, Venumbaka NR, Mungara J, Vijayakumar P, Rajendran S, Elangovan A. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent;32(4):304-310. 2014.
25. Eliades T, Bourauel C. Intraoral aging of orthodontic materials: the picture we miss and its clinical relevance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop;127:403-412.2005.
Abstracted / indexed in
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Submission Turnaround Time
Conferences
Top