Article Data

  • Views 1111
  • Dowloads 229

Original Research

Open Access

Effect of Whitening Toothpastes and Brushing on Microhardness of Esthetic Restorative Materials

  • Fouad Salama1,2,*,
  • Faika Abdelmegid3
  • Lamya Alhomaidhi4
  • Sara Alswayyed4
  • Shatha Alfarraj4

1Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Detroit Mercy, USA

2Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

3Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

4College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-44.5.2 Vol.44,Issue 5,September 2020 pp.296-301

Published: 01 September 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): Fouad Salama E-mail: salamafs@udmercy.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Whitening toothpastes are widely used. Hence, it is important to understand their effect on the surface properties of restorative materials. To evaluate the effect of three over-the-counter whitening toothpastes and toothbrushing simulation on microhardness of three restorative materials. Study design: Forty cylindrical (10x2mm) specimens were prepared from each restorative material and randomly assigned into four groups/10 each according to the whitening toothpastes used and distilled water (control). All specimens were measured for microhardness (Baseline–T1). The specimens were brushed with a soft brush using an in vitro tooth-brushing simulator with the assigned whitening toothpaste using the same setting for brushing cycles/load for all groups. Specimens were then measured for microhardness (T2) similar to baseline. Results: The highest (mean+SD) microhardness after application of the whitening toothpastes and brushing was recorded for Intense White and Filtek Z250 XT (127.6+1.8), followed by Optic White and Fuji ll LC (73.9+0.9) and Optic White and Photac Fill (72.7+1.3). There was statistically significant difference for microhardness between pre- and post-application of the whitening toothpastes and brushing for all tested restorative materials (P=0.0001). The microhardness of Filtek Z250XT with 3D White post-application of the whitening toothpastes and brushing was lowest compared to other toothpastes and control (P=0.0001). Conclusion: Microhardness increased after application of the whitening toothpastes and toothbrushing simulation for all combination of tested restorative materials and whitening toothpastes. The microhardness of FIiltek Z250XT with 3D White post-application of the whitening toothpastes and brushing was lowest compared to other toothpastes and control.


Keywords

Whitening toothpastes; Microhardness; Restorative Materials; Bleaching

Cite and Share

Fouad Salama,Faika Abdelmegid,Lamya Alhomaidhi,Sara Alswayyed, Shatha Alfarraj. Effect of Whitening Toothpastes and Brushing on Microhardness of Esthetic Restorative Materials. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2020. 44(5);296-301.

References

1. Costa SX, Becker AB, de Souza Rastelli AN, de Castro Monteiro Loffredo L, de Andrade MF, Bagnato VS. Effect of Four Bleaching Regimens on Color Changes and Microhardness of Dental Nanofilled Composite. Int J Dent;31: 38,45. 2009.

2. American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Policy on the use of dental bleaching for child and adolescent patients. Pediatr Dent;36(6) Suppl 6:72-74. 2014.

3. Joiner A. Whitening Toothpastes: A Review of the Literature. J Dent; 38 Suppl 2:17-24. 2010.

4. Bruno G S Casado, Sandra L D Moraes, Gleicy F M Souza, Catia M F Guerra, Juliana R Souto-Maior, Cleidiel A A Lemos, Belmiro C E Vasconcelos, Eduardo P Pellizzer. Efficacy of Dental Bleaching with Whitening Dentifrices: A Systematic Review. Int J Dent;7868531. 2018.

5. Haywood VB. Nightguard Vital Bleaching: Current Concepts and Research. J Am Dent Assoc;128 Suppl:19S-25S. 1997.

6. Kihn PW. Vital Tooth Whitening. Dent Clin North Am;51(2):319-331. 2007.

7. Fiorillo L, Laino L, De Stefano R, D’Amico C, Bocchieri S, Amoroso G, Isola G, Cervino G. Dental Whitening Gels: Strengths and Weaknesses of an Increasingly Used Method. Gels;5(3):3-12. 2019.

8. Epple M, Meyer F, Enax J. A Critical Review of Modern Concepts for Teeth Whitening. Dent J;7(79):1-13. 2019.

9. Peraro Vaz VT, Jubilato DP, Mendonça de Oliveira MR, Bortolatto JF, Floros MC, Rached Dantas AA, de Oliveira Junior OB. Whitening Toothpaste Containing Activated Charcoal, Blue Covarine, Hydrogen Peroxide or Microbeads: Which One Is the Most Effective? J Appl Oral Sci;27:e20180051. 2019.

10. Kugel G. Over-the-counter tooth-whitening systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent;24(4A):376-382. 2003.

11. Demarco FF, Meireles SS, Masotti AS. Over-the counter whitening agents: a concise review. Braz Oral Res;23 Suppl 1:64-70. 2009.

12. American Dental association (ADA) Council on Scientific Affairs Oral Health Topics: Whitening, Key Points. Accessed on Jan 25, 2020 at: https://www.ada.org/en/member-center/oral-health-topics/whitening.

13. Technavio Teeth Whitening Market—Drivers and Forecasts by Technavio. 2017. Accessed on Jan 25, 2020 at: https:// www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170421005701/en/Teeth-Whitening-Market—-Drivers-Forecasts-Technavio.

14. Donly KJ, Segura A, Henson T, Barker ML, Gerlach RW. Randomized Controlled Trial of Professional at-Home Tooth Whitening in Teenagers. Gen Dent;55(7):669-674. 2007.

15. Jurema AL, Claudino ES, Torres CR, Bresciani E, Caneppele TM. Effect of Over-the-counter Whitening Products Associated or Not With 10% Carbamide Peroxide on Color Change and Microhardness: in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract;19(4):359-366. 2018.

16. Lima DA, Silva AL, Aguiar FH, Liporoni PC, Munin E, Ambrosano GM, Lovadino JR. In Vitro Assessment of the Effectiveness of Whitening Dentifrices for the Removal of Extrinsic Tooth Stains. Braz Oral Res;22(2):106-111. 2008.

17. Shafiei F, Doustfatemeh S. Effect of a Combined Bleaching Regimen on the Microhardness of a Sealed Methacrylate-Based and a Silorane-Based Composite J Dent (Shiraz);14(3):111-117. 2013.

18. Mara da Silva T, Barbosa Dantas DC, Franco TT, Franco LT, Rocha Lima Huhtala MF. Surface Degradation of Composite Resins under Staining and Brushing Challenges. J Dent Sci;14(1):87-92. 2019.

19. Khamverdi Z, Kasraie Sh, Rezaei-Soufi L, Jebeli S. Comparison of the Effects of Two Whitening Toothpastes on Microhardness of the Enamel and a Microhybride Composite Resin: An in Vitro Study. J Dent (Tehran);7(3):139-145. 2010.

20. Mathew S, Banu A, Viswanath P. Effect of Non-Alcoholic Mouthwash on Hardness of Glass Ionomer Cement, Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite Resin-an in Vitro Study. Int J Recent Sci Res;9(9):28887-28891. 2018.

21. Rashidian A, Saghiri M, Bigloo S, Afsharianzadeh M. Effect of Fluoride Gel on Microhardness of Flowable Composites: An In-Vitro Study. J Dent Sch;32(1):16-22. 2014.

22. Augusto MG, Borges AB, Pucci CR, Mailart MC, Gomes Torres CR. Effect of Whitening Toothpastes on Wear and Roughness of Ormocer and Methacrylate-Based Composites. Am J Dent;31(6):303-308. 2018.

23. Roopa KB, Basappa N, Prabhakar AR, Raju OS, Lamba G. Effect of Whitening Dentifrice on Micro Hardness, Colour Stability and Surface Roughness of Aesthetic Restorative Materials. J Clin Diagn Res;10(3):ZC06–ZC11. 2016.

24. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips’ science of dental materials: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.

25. Diab M, Zaazou M, Mubarak E, Olaa M. Effect of Five Commercial Mouthrinses on the Microhardness and Color Stability of Two Resin Composite Restorative Materials. Aust J Basic Appl Sci;1(4):667-674. 2007.

26. Yanikoglu N, Duymus ZY, Yilmaz B. Effects of Different Solutions on the Surface Hardness of Composite Resin Materials. Dent Mater J;28(3):344-351. 2009.

27. DeWald JP, Ferracane JL. A Comparison of Four Modes of Evaluating Depth of Cure of Light-Activated Composites. J Dent Res;66(3):727-730. 1987.

28. Rueggeberg FA, Craig RG. Correlation of Parameters Used to Estimate Monomer Conversion in A Light-Cured Composite. J Dent Res;67(6):932-937. 1988.

29. Claydon NC, Moran J, Bosma ML, Shirodaria S, Addy M, Newcombe R. Clinical Study to Compare the Effectiveness of A Test Whitening Toothpaste With A Commercial Whitening Toothpaste at Inhibiting Dental Stain. J Clin Periodontol;31(12):1088-1091. 2004.

30. Steinberg D, Mor C, Dogan H, Zacks B, Rotstein I. Effect of Salivary Biofilm on the Adherence of Oral Bacteria to Bleached and Non-Bleached Restorative Material. Dent Mater;15(1):14-20. 1999.

31. Polydorou O, Hellwig E, Auschill TM. The Effect of Different Bleaching Agents on the Surface Texture of Restorative Materials. Oper Dent;31(4):473-480. 2006.

32. Fay RM, Servos T, Powers JM. Color of Restorative Materials after Staining and Bleaching. Oper Dent;24(5):292-296. 1999.

33. Praveen J, Jayasree S. Comparison of the Effects of Different Toothpastes on the Micro Hardness of A Nano Hybrid Composite Resin–An in-Vitro Study. IOSR-JDMS;16(12):6-11. 2017.

34. Torabi K, Rasaeipour S, Ghodsi S, Reza Khaledi AA, Vojdani M. Evaluation of the Effect of a Home Bleaching Agent on Surface Characteristics of Indirect Esthetic Restorative Materials—Part II Microhardness. J Contemp Dent Pract;15(4):438-443. 2014.

35. Meyers IA, McQueen MJ, Harbrow D, Seymour GJ. The Surface Effect of Dentifrices. Aust Dent J;45(2):118-124. 2000.

36. Carey CM .Tooth Whitening: What We Now Know. J Evid Based Dent Pract;14 Suppl:70-76. 2014.

37. Jyothi K, Crasta S, Venugopal P. Effect of Five Commercial Mouth Rinses on the Microhardness of a Nanofilled Resin Composite Restorative Material: An in Vitro Study. J Conserv Dent;15(3):214-217. 2012.

38. Son SA, Roh HM, Hur B, Kwon YH, Park JK. The effect of resin thickness on polymerization characteristics of silorane-based composite resin. Restor Dent Endod;39(4):310–318. 2014.

39. Hashemikamangar SS, Pourhashemi SJ, Talebi M, Kiomarsi N, Kharazifard MJ. Effect of organic acids in dental biofilm on microhardness of a silorane-based composite. Restor Dent Endod;40(3):188-94. 2015.

40. Leprince JG, Leveque P, Nysten B, Gallez B, Devaux J, Leloup G. New insight into the “depth of cure” of dimethacrylate-based dental composites. Dent Mater;28(5):512-20. 2012.

41. Groninger AIS, Soares GP, Sasaki RT, Ambrosano GMB, Lovadino JR, Aguiar FHB. Microhardness of nanofilled composite resin light-cured by LED or QTH units with different times. Brazilian J Oral Sci;10:189-192. 2011.

42. García-Contreras R, Scougall-Vilchis R, Acosta-Torres L, Arenas-Arrocena M, García-Garduño R & de la Fuente-Hernández J. Vickers microhardness comparison of 4 composite resins with different types of filler. J Oral Res;4(5):313-320. 2015.

43. Finan L, Palin WM FH, Moskwa N WC, McGinley EL, Fleming GJ. The influence of irradiation potential on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of two bulk-fill flowable RBC base materials. Dent Mater;29(8):906-912. 2013.

44. Chuenarrom C, Benjakul P, Daosodsai P. Effect of indentation load and time on knoop and vickers microhardness tests for enamel and dentin. Mater Res;12:473-476. 2009.

45. da Rosa GM, da Silva LM, de Menezes M, do Vale HF, Regalado DF, Pontes DG. Effect of Whitening Dentifrices on the Surface Roughness of a Nanohybrid Composite Resin. Eur J Dent;10(2):170-175. 2016.

46. Yikilgan I, Kamak H,Akgul S, Ozcan S, Bala O. Effects of Three Different Bleaching Agents on Microhardness and Roughness of Composite Sample Surfaces Finished With Different Polishing Techniques. J Clin Exp Dent;9(3):e460-e465. 2017.

47. Srinivasan K, Chitra S. Effects of Different Concentrations of Bleaching Agent on the Micro Hardness of Restorative Materials. An In Vitro Study. J Res Med Dent Sci;3(3):188-193. 2015.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top