Article Data

  • Views 965
  • Dowloads 185

Original Research

Open Access

Gender Differences in Pediatric Dentistry Chairs in the United States and Canada

  • Janice A Townsend1,*,
  • Marcio A da Fonseca2
  • Tobias E Rodriguez3
  • Charles W LeHew 2

1Department of Dentistry Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Dentistry, The Ohio State University College of Dentistry Columbus, OH, USA

2Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Dentistry, Chicago, IL, USA

3Academy for Academic Leadership, Atlanta, GA, USA

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-44.5.6 Vol.44,Issue 5,September 2020 pp.323-331

Published: 01 September 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): Janice A Townsend E-mail: janice.townsend@nationwidechildrens.org

Abstract

Objective: To analyze gender differences in personal and professional demographics, job perceptions and work satisfaction between male and female pediatric dentistry academic leaders in the United States and Canada. Study Design: A 40-question survey was sent electronically to department chairs requesting information about demographics, current circumstances of the position, professional history, and opinions about the position. Data was analyzed by the sex of the respondent. Results: Eighty-eight surveys were distributed electronically and 55 chairs responded (response rate: 62.5%). Women comprised 29.5% of the sample, were younger and had less leadership training than men. Men had served longer in the position (t(41)=2.02, p=0.05) and had higher ranking academic titles. Women spent more time managing personnel (p=0.026), creating courses and programs (p=0.029), and teaching (p=0.006) than men. Female chairs perceived to have a difficult relationship with the faculty (p=0.027), felt they received less faculty support (p=0.002), and were significantly more dissatisfied in the job (p=0.037). Men were more stressed about a heavy workload than women (p=0.001). Conclusion: Gender was significantly related to the demographics, experience, perceptions of the skills and abilities required for job performance, time management and job satisfaction for pediatric dentistry department chairs in American and Canadian institutions.


Keywords

Leadership; Dental Education; Gender Roles; Women; Faculty

Cite and Share

Janice A Townsend,Marcio A da Fonseca,Tobias E Rodriguez,Charles W LeHew . Gender Differences in Pediatric Dentistry Chairs in the United States and Canada. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2020. 44(5);323-331.

References

1. Whelton H, Wardman MJ. The landscape for women leaders in dental education, research, and practice. J Dent Educ 79: S7-S12, 2015.

2. Li J, de Souza R, Esfandiari S, Feine J. Have women broken the glass ceiling in North American dental leadership? Adv Dent Res 30: 78-84, 2019.

3. McKay JC, Quinonez CR. The feminization of dentistry: implications for the profession. J Can Dent Assoc 78: c1, 2012.

4. Kfouri MG, Moyses SJ, Moyses ST. Women’s motivation to become dentists in Brazil. J Dent Educ 77: 810-816, 2013.

5. Tandon S, Kohli A, Bhalla S. Barriers to leadership positions for Indian women in academic dentistry. Intern Dent J 57: 331-337, 2007.

6. Tiwari T, Randall CL, Cohen L, et al. Gender inequalities in the dental workforce: Global perspectives. Adv Dent Res 30: 60-68, 2019.

7. American Dental Education Association. ADEA Snapshot of Dental Education 2019-20. https://www.adea.org/uploadedFiles/ADEA/Content_ Conversion_Final/deansbriefing/2019-20_ADEA_Snapshot_of_Dental_ Education.pdf

8. Ioannidou E, D’Souza RN, Macdougall MJ. Gender equity in dental academics: gains and unmet challenges. J Dent Res 93: 5-7, 2014.

9. Yuan JC-C, Lee DJ, Kongkiatjkamon S, et al. Gender trends in dental leadership and academics: A twenty-two-year observation. J Dent Educ 74: 372-380, 2010.

10. American Dental Education Association. Survey of Dental School Faculty, 2016-17. Full-time dental scholl faculty by gender, and race and ethnicity, 2016-17 academic year. https://www.adea.org/faculty/

11. Gabbe SG, Hagan Vetter M, Nguyen MC, Moffatt-Bruce S, Fowler JM. Changes in the burnout profile of chairs of academic departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology over the past 15 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 219: 303.e1-303.e6, 2018.

12. Turaga KK, Green DE, Jayakrishnan TT, Hwang M, Gamblin TC. Attributes of a surgical chairperson associated with extramural funding of a department of surgery. J Surg Res 185: 549-554, 2013.

13. Weiss A, Lee KC, Tapia V, et al. Equity in surgical leadership for women: more work to do. Am J Surg 208: 494-498, 2014.

14. Eloy JA, Blake DM, D’Aguillo C, Svider PF, Folbe AJ, Baredes S. Academic benchmarks for Otolaryngology leaders. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 124: 622-629, 2015.

15. Han J, Stillings S, Hamann H, Terry R, Moy L. Gender and subspecialty of Urology faculty in department-based leadership roles. Urology 110: 36-39, 2017.

16. Humberstone E. Women deans’ perceptions of the gender gap in American medical deanships. Educ Health (Abingdon) 30: 248-253, 2017.

17. Lantz PM. Gender and leadership in healthcare administration: 21st century progress and challenges. J Healthc Manag 53: 291-301, 2008.

18. Travis EL, Doty L, Helitzer DL. Sponsorship: a path to the academic medicine C-suite for women faculty? Acad Med 88: 1414-1417, 2013.

19. Doyle M, Pederson A, Meltzer-Brody S. Demographic and personal characteristics of male and female chairs in academic Psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry 40: 402-409, 2016.

20. Blood EA, Ullrich NJ, Hirshfeld-Becker DR, et al. Academic women faculty: are they finding the mentoring they need? J Womens Health (Larchmt) 21: 1201-1208, 2012.

21. Gadbury-Amyot CC, Pyle MA, Van Ness CJ, Overman PR, West KP. Which way to lean? A national study of women dental faculty members’ career aspirations and choices. J Dent Educ 80:1392-1404, 2016.

22. Edmunds LD, Ovseiko PV, Shepperd S, et al. Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence. Lancet 388: 2948-2958, 2016.

23. Kirchheimer B. A woman’s place is in...healthcare, as Modern Healthcare’s Top 25 Women connote explosive growth in the number of female executives in C-suites. Mod Healthc 37: 6-7, 20, 22, 2007.

24. Isaac C, Griffin L. Women chairs in academic medicine: engendering strategic intuition. J Health Organ Manag 29: 498-514, 2015.

25. Kaatz A, Carnes M. Stuck in the out-group: Jennifer can’t grow up, Jane’s invisible, and Janet’s over the hill. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 23:481- 484, 2014.

26. Rodriguez TE, Zhang MB, Tucker-Lively FL, et al. Profile of department chairs in U.S. and Canadian dental schools: Demographics, requirements for success, and professional development needs. J Dent Educ 80: 365-373, 2016.

27. Oral Health Workforce Research Center. A National Study of the Practice Characteristics of Women in Dentistry and Potential Impacts on Access to Care for Underserved Communities. Center for Health Workforce Studies, School of Public Health, University of Albany, State University of New York, pp. 1-84, 2019.

28. Wood AJ, Gaid GG. Pediatric dentistry academic workforce survey. Pediatr Dent 40: 340-345, 2018.

29. Feldman CA. Attaining and sustaining leadership for U.S. women in Dentistry. J Dent Educ 79: S13-S17, 2015.

30. da Fonseca MA, Townsend JA, Rodriguez TE, LeHew CW. Characteristics and professional development needs of pediatric dentistry chairs in the United States and Canada. Pediatr Dent 41: 293-298, 2019.

31. Peretz B, Ram D, Gleicher H, Mamber E. Professional education and practice arrangements: are there gender differences among paediatric dentists in Israel? Intern Dent J 50:390-394, 2000.

32. Reed MJ, Corry AM, Liu YW. The role of women in dental education: Monitoring the pipeline to leadership. J Dent Educ 76: 1427-1436, 2012.

33. Wee AG, Weiss RO, Wichman CS, Sukotjo C, Brundo GC. Characteristics identified for success by restorative dental science department chairpersons. J Dent Educ 80: 275-280, 2016.

34. Bissing MA, Lange EMS, Davila WF, et al. Status of women in academic Anesthesiology: A 10-year update. Anesth Analg 128: 137-143, 2019.

35. Hofler L, Hacker MR, Dodge LE, Ricciotti HA. Subspecialty and gender of Obstetrics and Gynecology faculty in department-based leadership roles. Obstet Gynecol 125: 471-476, 2015.

36. Nesbitt PE, Inglehart MR, JC S. Work environment perceptions of full-time dental educators: Does gender matter? J Dent Educ 67: 916-924, 2003.

37. Spickard A, Jr., Gabbe SG, Christensen JF. Mid-career burnout in generalist and specialist physicians. JAMA 288: 1447-1450, 2002.

38. Baecher-Lind L. Women in leadership positions within Obstetrics and Gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 120: 1415-1418, 2012.

39. Messner AH, Shimahara E. Letters of recommendation to an Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery residency program: their function and the role of gender. Laryngoscope 118: 1335-1344, 2008.

40. Madera JM, Hebl MR, Martin RC. Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: agentic and communal differences. J Appl Psychol 94: 1591- 1599, 2009.

41. Jena AB, Khullar D, Ho O, Olenski AR, Blumenthal DM. Sex differences in academic rank in US medical schools in 2014. JAMA 314: 1149-1158, 2015.

42. Soklaridis S, Zahn C, Kuper A, Gillis D, Taylor VH, C W. Men’s fear of mentoring in the #MeToo era — What’s at stake for academic medicine? N Eng J Med 379: 2270-2274, 2018.

43. Howell LP, Lyons ML, Thor A, Dandar V. Sex differences in workplace satisfaction and engagement of academic pathologists: Opportunities to enhance faculty diversity. Arch Pathol Lab Med 139: 936-942, 2015.

44. Froeschle ML, Sinkford JC. Full-time dental faculty perceptions of satisfaction with the academic work environment. J Dent Educ 73: 1153-1170, 2009.

45. McPhillips HA, Stanton B, Zuckerman B, Stapleton FB. Role of a pediatric department chair: factors leading to satisfaction and burnout. J Pediatr 151: 425-430, 2011.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top