Effects of Combined Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Facemask Therapy on the Mandibular Dental Arch in Mixed Dentition

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the mandibular dental arch and incisor alignment induced by combined bonded Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME) and Face Mask (FM) therapy in the mixed dentition stage in which leeway space was used throughout the treatment. Study Design: This retrospective study evaluates pretreatment (T0) and posttreatment (T1) cephalometric radiographs and orthodontic models of 25 patients (mean age: 10.75±2.64), in mixed dentition, having skeletal Class 3 anomaly (ANB<0) with maxillary retrognatism (SNA=77.2±0.68) and bilateral posterior crossbite treated with bonded Hyrax RME-FM. Mean treatment duration was 10.4 months. Dental model measurements were performed using the 3Shape OrthoAnalyzerTM 2013-1 program. Changes in the mandibular incisor and first molar positions were determined on cephalometric radiographs. Statistical evaluation was done with a paired t-test. Results: A significant increase of 1.2 mm was found in intermolar width (p<0.001) in the mandibular dental arch. There was a significant decrease (1.4 mm) (p<0.001) in arch depth and an increase in arch length discrepancy (1.7mm)(p<0.01). There was a significant increase (0.8mm) (p<0.05) in the incisors’ irregularity score (LII). IMPA showed a significant decrease (p<0.05). Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware that mandibular crowding tends to increase during this type of combined therapy.

Angle Class III; Crowding; Reverse headgear; Dental arch length; Dental arch depth

1. Guyer EC, Ellis E 3rd, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG. Components of Class III Malocclusion in Juveniles and Adolescents. Angle Orthod56: 7-30, 1986.

2. Ellis E 3rd, McNamara JA Jr. Components of adult Class III malocclusion.J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42: 295-305, 1984.

3. Kapust AJ, Sinclair PM,Turley PK.Cephalometric effects of face mask/ expansion therapy in Class III children: A comparison of three age groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113: 204-212, 1998.

4. Nartallo-Turley PE,Turley PK. Cephalometric effects of combined palatal expansion and facemask therapy on Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod68: 217-224, 1998.

5. Ngan P, Hagg U, Yiu C, Merwin D, Wei SHY. Treatment response to maxillary expansion and protraction. Eur J Orthod 18: 151-168, 1996.

6. Vaughn GA, Mason B, Moon HB,Turley PK. The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128: 299-309, 2005.

7. Kanomi R, Deguchi T, Kakuno E, Takano-Yamamoto T, Roberts WE. CBCT of skeletal changes following rapid maxillary expansion to increase archlength with a development-dependent bonded or banded appliance. Angle Orthod 83: 851-857, 2013.

8. Çörekçi B, Göyenç YB. Dentofacial changes from fan-type rapid maxillary expansion vs. traditional rapid maxillary expansion in early mixedd entition. Angle Orthod83: 842-850, 2013.

9. Kim JH, Viana MAG, Graber TM, Omerza FF, BeGole EA. The effectiveness of protraction face mask therapy: A meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113: 204-212, 1998.

10. Akkaya S, Lorenzon S, Üçem TT. A comparison of sagittal and vertical effects between bonded rapid and slow maxillary expansion procedures. Eur J Orthod 21: 175-80, 1999.

11.Farronato G, Giannini L, Galbiati G, Maspero C. Sagittal and vertical effects of rapid maxillary expansion in Class I, II, and III occlusions. Angle Orthod 81: 298-303, 2011.

12. McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L, McClatchey LMN. Orthodontic and orthopedic expansion of the transverse dimension: A four decade perspective. Semin Orthod 25: 3-15, 2019.

13. Akkaya S, Gülsen A, Taner-Sarisoy L, Balos B. Evaluation of the Effects of Maxillary Expansion on the Nasopharyngeal Area. World J Orthod 3: 211-216, 2002.

14. da SilvaFilho OG, Magro AC, Capelozza Filho L. Early treatment of the Class III malocclusion with rapid maxillary expansion and maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113: 196-203, 1998.

15. Uzuner FD, Öztürk D, Kale Varlık S. Effects of combined bonded maxillary expansion and face mask on dental arch length in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusions. J Clin Pediatr Dent 41: 75-81, 2017.

16.Lione R, Huanca Ghislanzoni LT, DefraiaE, Franchi L, Cozza P. Bonded versus banded rapid palatal expander followed by facial mask therapy: analysis on digital dental casts. Eur J Orthod 38: 217–222, 2016.

17. Ngan P, Yiu C, Hu A, Hägg U, Wei SH, Gunel E. Cephalometric and occlusal changes following maxillary expansion and protraction. Eur J Orthod 20: 237-254, 1998.

18.Sakamoto T. Effective timing for the application of orthopedic force in the skeletal Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod 80:411-6, 1981.

19.Wisth P J, Tritrapunt A, Rygh P, Boe OE, Norderval K. The effect of maxillary protraction on front occlusion and facial morphology. Acta Odontol Scand 45:227-37, 1987.

20.Ngan P. Early Timely Treatment of Class III Malocclusion. Semin Orthod 11:140–145, 2005

21.Bishara SE. (2001) Facial and dental changes in adolescence. In Bishara SE. (Ed.), Text book of orthodontics (pp.66-82) Pennsylvania, USA: Saunders. 22. Uzuner FD, Gülşen Ş, Kale Varlık S ,Tortop T. Effects of combined rapid palatal expansion and face mask therapy on mandibular dentition. Acta Odontol Turc 36: 86-81, 2019.

23. Tibana RHW, Palagi LM, Miguel JAM. Changes in dental arch measurements of young adults with normal occlusion—a longitudinal study. Angle Orthod 74: 618–623, 2004.

24. Björk A, Skieller V.Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 5: 1-46.1983.

25.Haas AJ. Rapid expansion of the maxillary dental arch and nasal cavity by opening the midpalatal suture. Angle Orthod 31:73-90, 1961.

26.Wertz RA. Skeletal and dental changes accompanying rapid midpalatal suture opening. Am J Orthod 58:41-66, 1970

27.Gryson JA. Changes in mandibular interdental distance concurrent with rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod 47:186-92, 1977.

28.Adkins MD, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Arch perimeter changes on rapid palatal expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 97:194-199, 1990

29.Lima AC, Lima AL, Lima Filho RMA, Oyen OJ. Spontaneous mandibular arch response after rapid palatal expansion: A long-term study on Class I malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126:576-582, 2004.

30.Moussa R, O’Reilly MT, Close JM. Long-term stability of rapid palatal expander treatment and edgewise mechanotherapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108:478-88, 1995.

31.Spillane LM, McNamara Jr JA. Maxillary adaptation to expansion in the mixed dentiton. Semin Orthod 1:176-187, 1995.

32.Sarı Z, Uysal T, Usumez S, Basciftci FA. Rapid Maxillary Expansion. Is it Better in the mixed or in the Permanent Dentiton? Angle Orthod 73;654- 661, 2003.

33.Geran RG, James A. McNamara Jr JA, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Shapiro LM. A prospective long-term study on the effects of rapid maxillary expansion in the early mixed dentition Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129:631-40, 2006.

34. MacDonald KE, Kapust AJ, Turley PK. Cephalometric after the correction of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116: 13-24, 1999.

35.Isci D, Turk T, Elekdag-Turk S. Activation-deactivation rapid palatal expansion and reverse headgear in Class III cases.Eur J Orthod 32: 706-715, 2010.

36. Ngan P, Wilmes B , Drescher D ,Martin C ,Weaver B, Gunel E. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment. Progress in Orthod. 16:26-37, 2015.

37. Williams MD, Sarver DM, Sadowsky PL, Bradley E. Combined rapid maxillary expansion and protraction facemask in the treatment of Class III malocclusions in growing children: a prospective long-term study. Semin Orthod 3: 265-274, 1997.

38.Nartallo-Turley PE, Turley PK. Cephalometric effects of combined palatal expansion and facemask therapy on Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 68: 217-224, 1998.

39.Moorrees CF, Reed RB. Changes in dental arch dimensions – expressed on the basis of tooth eruption as a measure of biologic age. 44:129– 41,1965. Cited from English JD, Peltomaki T, Pham-Litschel K. Mosby’s Orthodontic Review. St.Louis, Missouri:Mosby Elsevier; 2009. P.18.

40- Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Treder JE, Stasi MJ. Changes in the maxillary and mandibular tooth size-arch length relationship from early adolescence to early adulthood. A longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 95:46-59, 1989

41.Germane N, Lindauer SJ, Rubenstein LK, Revere JH, Isaacson RJ. Increase in arch perimeter due to orthodontic expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 100:421-427, 1991.