Article Data

  • Views 813
  • Dowloads 221

Original Research

Open Access

Comparing Dental Treatment between Children Receiving and not Receiving Silver Diamine Fluoride

  • Michael R Davis1
  • E LaRee Johnson2
  • Beau D Meyer1,3,*,

1Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

2Carolina Pediatric Dentistry, Raleigh, NC, USA

3Division of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-44.6.2 Vol.44,Issue 6,November 2020 pp.400-406

Published: 01 November 2020

*Corresponding Author(s): Beau D Meyer E-mail: meyer.781@osu.edu

Abstract

Objectives: The objective was to compare dental visits, procedures, and expenditures in children with newly diagnosed caries. Study design: A retrospective chart review was conducted in a two dentist private practice in North Carolina. Demographic data, health status, and dental treatment data was collected. Analysis relied upon nearest neighbor matching to estimate the average treatment effects of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) by comparing children who received SDF to children who did not receive SDF (n=104 matches). Results: After matching on age, gender, race, insurance status, dental cooperation, and dmft, the SDF group had significantly more dental visits (average treatment effect on treated (ATET)=1.08), fewer restorations (ATET=2.37), and fewer restorative and overall treatment expenditures (ATET=$402 and $292, respectively) than the non-SDF group. The SDF group more frequently received treatment under general anesthesia (26% vs 7%), so this group was excluded in secondary analysis. Among children who did not receive general anesthesia, the SDF group had significantly more dental visits (ATET=.66), fewer restorations (ATET=2.74), and fewer restorative and overall treatment expenditures (ATET=$566 and $515, respectively) than the nonSDF group. Conclusion: SDF can offer cost savings when used as an adjunct to, rather than a complete replacement for, restorative treatment in young children.


Keywords

Silver diamine fluoride; Dental caries; Dental economics

Cite and Share

Michael R Davis,E LaRee Johnson, Beau D Meyer. Comparing Dental Treatment between Children Receiving and not Receiving Silver Diamine Fluoride. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2020. 44(6);400-406.

References

1. Dye BA, Mitnik GL, Iafolla TJ, Vargas CM. Trends in dental caries in children and adolescents according to poverty status in the United States from 1999 through 2004 and from 2011 through 2014. J Am Dent Assoc 2017;148(8):550-65.e7.

2. Duangthip D, Chen KJ, Gao SS, Lo ECM, Chu CH. Managing Early Childhood Caries with Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Topical Silver and Fluoride Agents. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14(10).

3. Tinanoff N, Reisine S. Update on early childhood caries since the Surgeon General’s Report. Acad Pediatr 2009;9(6):396-403.

4. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on Behavior Guidance for the Pediatric Dental Patient. Pediatr Dent 2016;38(6):185-98.

5. Hansen R, Shirtcliff RM, Ludwig S, et al. Changes in Silver Diamine Fluoride Use and Dental Care Costs: A Longitudinal Study. Pediatr Dent 2019;41(1):35-44.

6. Crystal YO, Marghalani AA, Ureles SD, et al. Use of Silver Diamine Fluoride for Dental Caries Management in Children and Adolescents, Including Those with Special Health Care Needs. Pediatr Dent 2017;39(5):135-45.

7. Crystal YO, Niederman R. Silver Diamine Fluoride Treatment Considerations in Children’s Caries Management. Pediatr Dent 2016;38(7):466-71.

8. Johhnson B, Serban N, Griffin PM, Tomar SL. Projecting the economic impact of silver diamine fluoride on caries treatment expenditures and outcomes in young U.S. children. J Public Health Dent 2019;79(3):215-21.

9. Hansen RN, Shirtcliff RM, Dysert J, Milgrom PM. Costs and Resource Use Among Child Patients Receiving Silver Nitrate/Fluoride Varnish Caries Arrest. Pediatr Dent 2017;39(4):304-07.

10. Pitts NB, Baez RJ, Diaz-Guillory C, et al. Early Childhood Caries: IAPD Bangkok Declaration. J Dent Child (Chic) 2019;86(2):72.

11. Tinanoff N, Baez RJ, Diaz Guillory C, et al. Early childhood caries epidemiology, aetiology, risk assessment, societal burden, management, education, and policy: Global perspective. Int J Paediatr Dent 2019;29(3):238-48.

12. Mehta A. Comprehensive review of caries assessment systems developed over the last decade. RSBO 2012;9(3):316-21

13. Stuart EA. Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Stat Sci 2010;25(1):1-21.

14. Jordan KH, McGwin G, Childers NK. Overestimation of Early Childhood Caries Using the dmfs Index. Pediatr Dent. 2020;42(3):208-211

15. Rosenbaum PR & Rubin DB. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc. 1984;79(387):516-524.
16. Meyer BD, Lee JY, Casey MW. Dental Treatment and Expenditures Under General Anesthesia Among Medicaid-Enrolled Children in North Carolina. Pediatr Dent 2017;39(7):439-44.

17. Bruen BK, Steinmetz E, Bysshe T, Glassman P, Ku L. Potentially preventable dental care in operating rooms for children enrolled in Medicaid. J Am Dent Assoc 2016;147(9):702-8.

18. Green LK, Lee JY, Roberts MW, Anderson JA, Vann WF Jr. A Cost Analysis of Three Pharmacologic Behavior Guidance Modalities in Pediatric Dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 2018; 40(7):419-424.

19. Thomas ML; Magher, K; Mugayar, L; Dávila M; Tomar SL. Silver Diamine Fluoride Helps Prevent Emergency Visits in Children with Early Childhood Caries. Pediatr Dentist, 2020; 42(3):217-220.

20. Azadani EN, Peng J, Kumar A, Casamassimo PS, Griffen A, Amini H, Ni A. A survival analysis of primary second molars in children treated under general anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020; 151(8):568-575.

21. Chi DL, Masterson EE. A serial cross-sectional study of pediatric inpatient hospitalizations for non-traumatic dental conditions. J Dent Res 2013;92(8):682-8.

22. Meyer BD, Kelly ER, McDaniel P. Dentists’ Adoption of Silver Diamine Fluoride among 1- to 5-Year-Old Children in North Carolina. JDR Clinical & Translational Research. 2020. https://doi. org/10.1177/2380084420913251


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top