Article Data

  • Views 868
  • Dowloads 214

Original Research

Open Access

Efficacy of a Modified Audio-Tactile Performance Technique with Braille (Atpb) on the Oral Hygiene Status of Visually Impaired Children

  • Devika J Nair1,*,
  • Amarshree A Shetty'1
  • Amitha M Hegde1

1A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangaluru, India

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-45.1.4 Vol.45,Issue 1,January 2021 pp.15-21

Published: 01 January 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Devika J Nair E-mail: devikajk@hotmail.com

Abstract

Objective: We assessed the effectiveness of a modified audio-tactile performance (ATP) technique with braille (ATPb) on the oral health statuses of visually-impaired children. Study design: Ninety visually-impaired institutionalized children received oral hygiene instructions using audio (AM), ATP or ATPb techniques. Plaque scores were assessed at baseline and after reinforcement and non-reinforcement periods. Results: In the totally visually-impaired, mean reductions in plaque scores in the ATPb, ATP and AM groups during the reinforcement period were 1.119 ± 0.260, 0.654 ± 0.239 and 0.237 ± 0.255, respectively (p <0.001), worsening to 0.107 ± 0.160, 0.083 ± 0.193 and −0.208 ± 0.267 during the non-reinforcement period (p <0.001), before culminating at 6 months at 1.227 ± 0.261, 0.737 ± 0.317 and 0.029 ± 0.108 (p <0.001). In partially visually-impaired children, reductions during the reinforcement period were 0.934 ± 0.279, 0.762 ± 0.270 and 0.118 ± 0.237, respectively, dropping to 0.176 ± 0.166, 0.083 ± 0.169 and −0.128 ± 0.114 without reinforcement and culminating at 1.109 ± 0.258, 0.845 ± 0.292 and −0.010 ± 0.226 (p <0.001). There were significant inter-group differences during the three periods (p <0.001), except in the ATP and ATPb groups during the non-reinforcement period for totally impaired (p = 0.157) and during reinforcement (p = 0.155) and non-reinforcement (p = 0.051) periods for partially impaired children. Conclusions: All three techniques were successful when reinforced periodically. However, only ATP and ATPb were successful during periods without reinforcement. The modified audio-tactile performance technique with braille (ATPb) was most effective, allowing visually-impaired children to retain oral hygiene information without intervention.

Keywords

Audio-tactile technique; Braille; Oral health education; Visually impaired children

Cite and Share

Devika J Nair,Amarshree A Shetty',Amitha M Hegde. Efficacy of a Modified Audio-Tactile Performance Technique with Braille (Atpb) on the Oral Hygiene Status of Visually Impaired Children. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021. 45(1);15-21.

References

1. Klingberg G. Children with disabilities. In Wright GZ, Kupietzky A. Behavior management in dentistry for children, Second edition. Ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Ames, IA ;93-105, 2014.

2. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol 96:614-8, 2012.

3. Titiyal JS, Pal N, Murthy GV, Gupta SK, Tandon R, Vajpayee RB, Gilbert CE. Causes and temporal trends of blindness and severe visual impairment in children in schools for the blind in North India. Br J Ophthalmol 87:941-5, 2003.

4. Joybell C, Krishnan R, V SK. Comparison of two brushing methods- Fone’s vs Modified Bass method in visually impaired children using the Audio Tactile Performance (ATP) Technique. J Clin Diagn Res 9:ZC19-22. 2015

5. Bhandary S, Shetty V, Hedge AM, Rai K. Knowledge of care providers regarding the oral health of visually impaired children. J Clin Pediatr Dent 36:411-5. 2012

6. Mohan R, Raju R, Gubbihal R, Kousalya PS. Comprehensive dental care for the visually impaired: A review. Int J Oral Health Med Res 3:97-101. 2016.

7. Hennequin M, Faulks D, Roux D. Accuracy of estimation of dental treatment need in special care patients. J Dent 28:131-6. 2000.

8. Shetty V, Hegde AM, Bhandary S, Rai K. Oral health status of the visually impaired children—a South Indian study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 34:213-6. 2010

9. Chi DL. Oral Health for US children with special health care needs. Pediatr Clin North Am 65:981-93. 2018.

10. Nair DJ, Shetty AA, Hegde AM. Comprehensive dental management of visually impaired children: A brief review. IJMSIR 3:235-43. 2018.

11. Hebbal M, Ankola AV. Development of a new technique (ATP) for training visually impaired children in oral hygiene maintenance. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 13:244-7. 2012.

12. Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal Disease in Pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condtion. Acta Odontol Scand 22:121-35.1964

13. Weddell JA, Sanders BJ, Jones JE. Dental problems of children with special health care needs, In McDonald RE , Avery DR, Dean JA. McDonald and Avery’s dentistry for the child and adolescent. 9th ed. Ed. Mosby/Elsevier. St. Louis, Mo: 460-86, 2011.

14. Unkel JH, Fenton SJ, Hobbs G, Jr., Frere CL. Toothbrushing ability is related to age in children. ASDC J Dent Child 62:346-8.1995.

15. Choo A, Delac DM, Messer LB. Oral hygiene measures and promotion: review and considerations. Aust Dent J 46:166-73. 2001.

16. Flanders RA. Effectiveness of dental health educational programs in schools. J Am Dent Assoc 114:239-42. 1987

17. Gibson JA, Wade AB. Plaque removal by the Bass and Roll brushing techniques. J Periodontol 48:456-9. 1977

18. Poyato-Ferrera M, Segura-Egea JJ, Bullon-Fernandez P. Comparison of modified Bass technique with normal toothbrushing practices for efficacy in supragingival plaque removal. Int J Dent Hyg 1:110-4. 2003

19. Robinson E. A comparative evaluation of the Scrub and Bass Methods of toothbrushing with flossing as an adjunct (in fifth and sixth graders). Am J Public Health 66:1078-81. 1976

20. Smutkeeree A, Rojlakkanawong N, Yimcharoen V. A 6-month comparison of toothbrushing efficacy between the horizontal Scrub and modified Bass methods in visually impaired students. Int J Paediatr Dent 21:278-83. 2011.

21. Reddy K, Sharma A. Prevalence of oral health status in visually impaired children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 29:25-7. 2011

22. Solanki J, Gupta S, Arora G, Bhateja S. Prevalence of dental caries and oral hygiene status among blind school children and normal children, Jodhpur city: A comparative study. J. Adv. Oral Res 4:1-5. 2013.

23. Ahmad MS Jindal MK, Khan S, Hashmi SH. Oral health knowledge, practice, oral hygiene status and dental caries prevalence among visually impaired students in residential institute of Aligarh. J Dent Oral Hygiene 1:22-6. 2009.

24. Bimstein E, Jerrell RG, Weaver JP, Dailey L. Oral characteristics of children with visual or auditory impairments. Pediatr Dent 36:336-41. 2014.

25. Reddy VK, Chaurasia K, Bhambal A, Moon N, Reddy EK. A comparison of oral hygiene status and dental caries experience among institutionalized visually impaired and hearing impaired children of age between 7 and 17 years in central India. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 31:141-5. 2013

26. Prashanth ST, Bhatnagar S, Das UM, Gopu H. Oral health knowledge, practice, oral hygiene status, and dental caries prevalence among visually impaired children in Bangalore. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 29:102-5. 2011.

27. Azrina AN, Norzuliza G, Saub R. Oral hygiene practices among the visually impaired adolescents. Ann Dent Univ Malaya 14:1-6. 2007.

28. Martens L, Marks L, Goffin G, Gizani S, Vinckier F, Declerck D. Oral hygiene in 12-year-old disabled children in Flanders, Belgium, related to manual dexterity. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 28:73-80. 2000.

29. Yalcinkaya SE, Atalay T. Improvement of oral health knowledge in a group of visually impaired students. Oral Health Prev Dent 4:243-53. 2006.

30. Mitsea AG, Karidis AG, Donta-Bakoyianni C, Spyropoulos ND. Oral health status in Greek children and teenagers, with disabilities. J Clin Pediatr Dent 26:111-8. 2001.

31. Tagelsir A, Khogli AE, Nurelhuda NM. Oral health of visually impaired schoolchildren in Khartoum State, Sudan. BMC Oral Health 13:33. 2013.

32. Jain A, Gupta J, Aggarwal V, Goyal C. To evaluate the comparative status of oral health practices, oral hygiene and periodontal status amongst visually impaired and sighted students. Spec Care Dentist 33:78-84. 2013.

33. Bennadi D Mythri H, Bharateesh JV. Dental Negligence among visually impaired children – a call for attention. RRJDS 1:26-8. 2013.

34. Kumar RK, Fareed N, Shanthi M. The effectiveness of oral health education program with and without involving self-maintainable oral hygiene skills among the visually impaired children. Int J of Scientific Study 1:51-9. 2013.

35. Chowdary PB, Uloopi KS, Vinay C, Rao VV, Rayala C. Impact of verbal, Braille text, and tactile oral hygiene awareness instructions on oral health status of visually impaired children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 34:43-7. 2016.

36. Ganapathi AK, Namineni S, Vaaka PH, Das R, Devi M, Akkaloori A, Kumbakonam A. Effectiveness of various sensory input methods in dental health education among blind children- A comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res 9:ZC75-8. 2015

37. Sardana D, Goyal A, Gauba K, Kapur A, Manchanda S. Effect of specially designed oral health preventive programme on oral health of visually impaired children: use of audio and tactile aids. Int Dent J 69:98-106. 2019.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top