Article Data

  • Views 1511
  • Dowloads 485

Original Research

Open Access

Comparative Analysis of Space Maintenance Using Transpalatal Arch and Nance Button

  • Andrea Martín-Vacas1
  • Antonia M. Caleya2
  • Nuria E. Gallardo2,*,

1Complutense University of Madrid, Faculty of Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry, Spain

2Complutense University of Madrid, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Dental Clinical Specialties, Spain

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-45.2.10 Vol.45,Issue 2,April 2021 pp.129-134

Published: 01 April 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Nuria E. Gallardo E-mail: negallar@ucm.es

Abstract

The aim of this manuscript analyses the efficacy of Transpalatal Arch (TPA) and Nance Button (NB) in maintaining space after the premature loss of upper primary molars. Study design: 54 subjects who needed space maintenance in the upper arch (23 in the TPA group and 31 in the NB group) and had radiographic follow-up until the appliance removal were enrolled in the study. The space loss was obtained from measurements carried out in initial and final radiographs. Type of dental loss and changes in molar relationship were also recorded. Results: The mean of space loss in the TPA group was 1.336mm, while in the NB group was 0.695mm, with no statistically significant differences between the total space loss neither the type of dental loss within the NB or TPA group (p >0.05). Conclusions: The loss of space in the unilateral second primary molar is higher in the TPA group than in the NB group, with significant statistically differences (p<0.05). It is concluded that the loss of the leeway space using a TPA as a space maintainer is greater than using a NB.

Keywords

Space maintainers; Space loss; Pediatric dentistry; Transpalatal arch; Nance button

Cite and Share

Andrea Martín-Vacas,Antonia M. Caleya,Nuria E. Gallardo. Comparative Analysis of Space Maintenance Using Transpalatal Arch and Nance Button. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021. 45(2);129-134.

References

1. Hutchinson SJ. On the premature extraction of deciduous canines. Br Dent Assoc J 5:75-82, 1884.

2. Davenport IB. The significance of the natural form and arrangement of the dental arches of a man, with a consideration of the changes which occur as a result of their artificial derangement by filing or by the extraction of teeth. Read before the New York Odontological Society, April 12th; Reprinted from the Dental Cosmos for July, 1887.

3. Monte-Santo AS, Viana SV, Moreira KMS, Imparato JCP, Mendes FM, Bonini GA. Prevalence of early loss of primary molar and its impact in schoolchildren’s quality of life. Int J Paediatr Dent 28(6):595-601, 2018.

4. Bansal M, Gupta N, Gupta P, Arora V, Thakar S. Reasons for extraction in primary teeth among 5-12 years school children in Haryana, India-A cross-sectional study. J Clin Exp Dent 9(4): e545, 2017.

5. Qudeimat MA, Fayle SA. The use of space maintainers at a UK pediatric dentistry department. ASDC J Dent Child 66(6):383-6, 1999.

6. Ahamed SSS, Reddy VN, Krishnakumar R, Mohan MG, Sugumaran DK, Rao AP. Prevalence of early loss of primary teeth in 5–10-year-old school children in Chidambaram town. Contemp Clin Dent 3(1):27, 2012.

7. Richardson ME. The relationship between the relative amount of space present in the deciduous dental arch and the rate and degree of space closure subsequent to the extraction of a deciduous molar. Dent Pract Dent Rec 16(3):111-8, 1965.

8. Clinch LM. A longitudinal study of the results of premature extraction of deciduous teeth between 3-4 and 13-14 years of age. D Practitioner 9:109- 28, 1959.

9. Rönnerman A, Thilander B. Facial and dental arch morphology in childrenwith and without early loss of deciduous mola rs. Am J Orthod 73(1):47-58, 1978.

10. Laing E, Ashley P, Naini FB, Gill DS. Space maintenance. Int J Paediatr Dent 19(3):155-62, 2009.

11. Bobak V, Christiansen RL, Hollister SJ, Kohn DH. Stress-related molar responses to the transpalatal arch: a finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 112(5):512-8, 1997.

12. Ingervall B, Hönigl KD, Bantleon H. Moments and forces delivered by transpalatal arches for symmetrical first molar rotation. Eur J Orthod 18(2):131-9, 1996.

13. Dahlquist A, Gebauer U, Ingervall B. The effect of a transpalatal arch for the correction of first molar rotation. Eur J Orthod 18(3):257-67, 1996.

14. Stivaros N, Lowe C, Dandy N, Doherty B, Mandall NA. A randomized clinical trial to compare the Goshgarian and Nance palatal arch. Eur J Orthod 32(2):171-6, 2010.

15. Marin Ferrer JM, Moreno González JP, Barbería Leache E, Alió Sanz JJ, Costa Ferrer F, de Nova García J, et al. El espacio de deriva. Estudio de una población española. Ortodoncia española: Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Ortodoncia 34(3):187-93, 1993.

16. AAPD. Management of the Developing Dentition and Occlusion in Pediatric Dentistry. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry 362-78, 2019-2020.

17. Terlaje RD, Donly KJ. Treatment planning for space maintenance in the primary and mixed dentition. ASDC J Dent Child 68(2):109-14, 2001.

18. Qudeimat MA, Fayle SA. The longevity of space maintainers: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 20:267-72, 1998.

19. Arikan F, Eronat N, Candan Ü, Boyacio lu H. Periodontal conditions associated with space maintainers following two different dental health education techniques. J Clin Pediatr Dent 31(4):229-34, 2007.

20. Northway WM, Wainright RL, Demirjian A. Effects of premature loss of deciduous molars. Angle Orthod 54(4):295-329, 1984.

21. Northway WM. The not-so-harmless maxillary: Primary first molar extraction. J Am Dent Assoc 131(12):1711-20, 2000.

22. Macena MCB, Katz CRT, Heimer MV, e Silva, Juliana Freire de Oliveira, Costa LB. Space changes after premature loss of deciduous molars among Brazilian children. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140(6):771-8, 2011.

23. Andreeva RS, Arnautska HI, Belcheva AB, Georgieva MT, Dimitrov EV. Loss of space according to the time and the type of the premature extracted deciduous teeth. J of IMAB 22(2):1169-71, 2016.

24. Rock WP. Extraction of primary teeth–balance and compensation. Int J Paediatr Dent 12(2):151-3, 2002.

25. Lin Y, Lin W, Lin YJ. Immediate and six-month space changes after premature loss of a primary maxillary first molar. J Am Dent Assoc 138(3):362-8, 2007.

26. Tunison W, Flores-Mir C, ElBadrawy H, Nassar U, El-Bialy T. Dental arch space changes following premature loss of primary first molars: a systematic review. Pediatr Dent 30(4):297-302, 2008.

27. Seward FS. Natural closure of deciduous molar extraction spaces. Angle Orthod 35(1):85-94, 1965.

28. Alexander SA, Askari M, Lewis P. The premature loss of primary first molars: Space loss to molar occlusal relationships and facial patterns. Angle Orthod 85(2):218-23, 2015.

29. Lin Y, Lin W, Lin YJ. Twelve-month space changes after premature loss of a primary maxillary first molar. Int J Paediatr Dent 21(3):161-6, 2011.

30. Lin YJ, Lin Y. Long-term space changes after premature loss of a primary maxillary first molar. J Dent Sci 12(1):44-8, 2017.

31. Park K, Jung D, Kim J. Three-dimensional space changes after premature loss of a maxillary primary first molar. Int J Paediatr Dent 19(6):383-9, 2009.

32. Hill CJ, Sorenson HW, Mink JR. Space maintenance in a child dental care program. J Am Dent Assoc 90(4):811-5, 1975.

33. Kupietzky A, Tal E. The transpalatal arch: an alternative to the Nance appliance for space maintenance. Pediatr Dent 29(3):235-8, 2007.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top