Treatment Outcomes of Pulpectomy in Primary Maxillary Incisors Filled with ZOE and Metapex: A Two-year Retrospective Study

Objectives: To address a literature gap by evaluating, in a larger set of samples, the clinical and radiographic outcomes of pulpectomy in primary maxillary incisors using ZOE and calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste. To also identify the predisposing factors for treatment outcomes. Study design: Medical charts of 124 patients (aged 16 to 60 months) and radiographs of their incisors (309 incisors) were reviewed (128 with ZOE and 181 with Metapex). All incisors were restored with composite resin crowns. Results: The radiographic success rates for ZOE and Metapex were: 85.9% and 82.9% at the 12-month recall, and 69.2% and 64% at the 24-month recall, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Clinical failures occurred more frequently in the Metapex group (P = 0.006), as clinical signs of pain and soft tissue pathosis were found in 6.2% of the Metapex cases at 24 months but none in the ZOE group. Significant predisposing factors for radiographic success were type of tooth, degree of obturation at recalls, and preoperative root resorption. Conclusions. The radiographic success rates are comparable between the ZOE and Metapex groups. Clinical pathological manifestations such as pain and soft tissue pathosis are seen in the Metapex group at recalls, but none in the ZOE group. Predisposing factors such as type of incisor, preoperative root resorption, and extent of filling at recalls are associated with the radiographic success rate.

Endodontics; Primary incisors; Pulpectomy

1. Tsai A, Hsiang C, Johnsen D. Caries levels and patterns in the primary dentition of preschool children in Taiwan. Chang Gung medical journal 23: 22-7, 2000.

2. Payne RG, Kenny DJ, Johnston DH, Judd PL. Two-year outcome study of zinc oxide-eugenol root canal treatment for vital primary teeth. J Can Dent Assoc 59: 528-30, 533-6, 1993.

3. Sadrian R, Coll JA. A long-term followup on the retention rate of zinc oxide eugenol filler after primary tooth pulpectomy. Pediatr Dent 15: 249-53, 1993.

4. Coll JA, Josell S, Nassof S, Shelton P, Richards MA. An evaluation of pulpal therapy in primary incisors. Pediatr Dent 10: 178-84, 1988.

5. Coll JA, Sadrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent 18: 57-63, 1996.

6. Barker BC, Lockett BC. Endodontic experiments with resorbable paste. Aust Dent J 16: 364-72, 1971.

7. Erausquin J, Muruzabal M. Root canal fillings with zinc oxide-eugenol cement in the rat molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 24: 547-58, 1967.

8. Kubota K, Golden BE, Penugonda B. Root canal filling materials for primary teeth: a review of the literature. ASDC J Dent Child 59: 225-7, 1992.

9. Nurko C, Garcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of a calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste (Vitapex) in root canal therapy for primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 23: 289-94, 1999.

10. Kawakami T, Nakamura C, Eda S. Effects of the penetration of a root canal filling material into the mandibular canal. 1. Tissue reaction to the material. Endod Dent Traumatol 7: 36-41, 1991.

11. Smaïl-Faugeron V GA, Courson F, Durieux P, Muller-Bolla M, Fron Chabouis H. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 31: CD003220, 2018.

12. Mortazavi M, Mesbahi M. Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 14: 417-24, 2004.

13. Ozalp N, Saroglu I, Sonmez H. Evaluation of various root canal filling materials in primary molar pulpectomies: an in vivo study. Am J Dent 18: 347-50, 2005.

14. Subramaniam P, Gilhotra K. Endoflas, zinc oxide eugenol and metapex as root canal filling materials in primary molars—a comparative clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 35: 365-9, 2011.

15. Trairatvorakul C, Chunlasikaiwan S. Success of pulpectomy with zinc oxide-eugenol vs calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste in primary molars: a clinical study. Pediatr Dent 30: 303-8, 2008.

16. Al-Ostwani AO, Al-Monaqel BM, Al-Tinawi MK. A clinical and radiographic study of four different root canal fillings in primary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 34: 55-9, 2016.

17. Pramila R, Muthu MS, Deepa G, Farzan JM, Rodrigues SJ. Pulpectomies in primary mandibular molars: a comparison of outcomes using three root filling materials. Int Endod J 49: 413-21, 2016.

18. Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Gajan EB. A clinical study of formocresol pulpotomy versus root canal therapy of vital primary incisors. J Clin Pediatr Dent 32: 211-4, 2008.

19. Coll JA, Josell S, Casper JS. Evaluation of a one-appointment formocresol pulpectomy technique for primary molars. Pediatr Dent 7: 123-9, 1985.

20. Flaitz CM, Barr ES, Hicks MJ. Radiographic evaluation of pulpal therapy for primary anterior teeth. ASDC J Dent Child 56: 182-5, 1989.

21. Howley B, Seale NS, McWhorter AG, Kerins C, Boozer KB, Lindsey D. Pulpotomy versus pulpectomy for carious vital primary incisors: randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent 34: 112-9, 2012.

22. Primosch RE, Ahmadi A, Setzer B, Guelmann M. A retrospective assessment of zinc oxide-eugenol pulpectomies in vital maxillary primary incisors successfully restored with composite resin crowns. Pediatr Dent 27: 470-7, 2005.

23. Smail-Faugeron V, Fron Chabouis H, Durieux P, Attal JP, Muller-Bolla M, Courson F. Development of a core set of outcomes for randomized controlled trials with multiple outcomes—example of pulp treatments of primary teeth for extensive decay in children. PLoS One 8: e51908, 2013.

24. Nurko C, Ranly DM, Garcia-Godoy F, Lakshmyya KN. Resorption of a calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste (Vitapex) in root canal therapy for primary teeth: a case report. Pediatr Dent 22: 517-20, 2000.

25. Garcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of an iodoform paste in root canal therapy for infected primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child 54: 30-4, 1987.

26. Ramar K, Mungara J. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomies using three root canal filling materials: an in-vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 28: 25-9, 2010.

27. Goldman M, Pearson A. A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF THE” HOLLOW TUBE” THEORY IN ENDODONTICS: STUDIES WITH NEO-TETRAZOLIUM. J Oral Ther Pharmacol 1:618-26, 1965.