Article Data

  • Views 921
  • Dowloads 209

Original Research

Open Access

Perception Regarding Pediatric Dentist’s Appearance and Factors Influencing the Child’s Responses

  • Camila Silva de Amorim1
  • Raildo da Silva Coqueiro2
  • Bruna Silva de Menezes3
  • Stefanni Olga Aguiar Sales Lima4
  • Lucianne Cople Maia1
  • Matheus Melo Pithon5,6,*,

1Pediatric Dentistry. Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro- UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro- RJ, Brazil

2Physiological Sciences. Department of Health I, Southwest Bahia State University-UESB, Jequié-BA, Brazil

3Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro- UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro- RJ, Brazil

4Department of Health I, Southwest Bahia State University-UESB, Jequié-BA, Brazil

5Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro- UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro- RJ, Brazil

6Department of Health I, Southwest Bahia State University-UESB, Jequié-BA, Brazil

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-45.2.4 Vol.45,Issue 2,April 2021 pp.90-97

Published: 01 April 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Matheus Melo Pithon E-mail: matheuspithon@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective: To develop, validate, and apply an instrument for assessing the children’s perception regarding pediatric dentist’s appearance, based upon the influence of age, gender, previous dental experience, and anxiety. Study design: Images and a nine-item questionnaire were developed. The acceptability, convergent-construct validity, and reliability based on reproducibility and internal consistency were evaluated. The validated instrument was applied in a cross-sectional study, with children (n=120) aged 7–12 years asked to evaluate images of pediatric dentists wearing different dental attire (A:all-white (control); B:printed coat and cap, colorful face mask; C:printed coat, cap and face mask; and D:white coat and cap, printed face mask). Children’s age, gender, and previous dental experiences were collected with the guardians. The Children’s Fear Survey Schedule–Dental Subscale assessed children’s anxiety. Descriptive and inferential statistics were carried out (p<0.05). Results: The instrument showed excellent acceptability, construct validity with moderate and strong correlations (>0.40), satisfactory reproducibility (ICC >0.70), and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient >0.70). Considering only the attire, the children’s perceptions were more positive with the use of attire C and D (p<0.05). Intergroup analysis of all the variables did not identify a statistically significant difference (p>0.05). In the intragroup analysis, compared to attire A: younger children have higher perception scores to attire D; girls, children with previous experience and without anxiety favored attire C and D; and children without previous experience showed no difference in comparison to A but did between B and C (p<0.05). Conclusion: The C and D attires promoted a more positive perception of the appearance of a pediatric dentist when compared to A; however, age, gender, previous dental experience, and anxiety did not influence the perception scores.

Keywords

Children; Questionnaires; Clothing; Pediatric Dentistry; Dental Anxiety

Cite and Share

Camila Silva de Amorim,Raildo da Silva Coqueiro,Bruna Silva de Menezes,Stefanni Olga Aguiar Sales Lima,Lucianne Cople Maia,Matheus Melo Pithon. Perception Regarding Pediatric Dentist’s Appearance and Factors Influencing the Child’s Responses. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021. 45(2);90-97.

References

1. Khandelwal M, Shetty RM, Rath S. Effectiveness of Distraction Techniques in Managing Pediatric Dental Patients. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent;12(1):18-24. 2019.

2. Nirmala S, Veluru S, Nuvvula S, Chilamakuri S. Preferences of dentist’s attire by anxious and nonanxious Indian children. J Dent Child;82(2):97- 101. 2015.

3. Sharma A, Kumar D, Anand A, Mittal V, Singh A, Aggarwal N. Factors predicting Behavior Management Problems during Initial Dental Examination in Children Aged 2 to 8 Years. Int. J Clin Pediatr Dent;10(1):5-9. 2017.

4. Panda A, Garg I, Bhobe AP. Children’s perspective on the dentist’s attire. Int J Paediatr Dent;24(2):98-103. 2014.

5. AAPD. Guideline on Behavior Guidance for the Pediatric Dental Patient. Pediatr Den.;38(6):185-98. 2016.

6. Kuscu OO, Caglar E, Kayabasoglu N, Sandalli N. Short communication: preferences of dentist’s attire in a group of Istanbul school children related with dental anxiety. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent;10(1):38-41. 2009.

7. Tong HJ, Khong J, Ong C, Ng A, Lin Y, Ng JJ, et al. Children’s and parents’ attitudes towards dentists’ appearance, child dental experience and their relationship with dental anxiety. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent;15(6):377-84. 2014.

8. Brosky ME, Keefer OA, Hodges JS, Pesun IJ, Cook G. Patient perceptions of professionalism in dentistry. J Dent Educ;67(8):909-15. . 2003.

9. Asokan A, Kambalimath HV, Patil RU, Maran S, Bharath K. A survey of the dentist attire and gender preferences in dentally anxious children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent;34(1):30. 2016.

10. Petrilli CM, Mack M, Petrilli JJ, Hickner A, Saint S, Chopra V. Understanding the role of physician attire on patient perceptions: a systematic review of the literature—targeting attire to improve likelihood of rapport (TAILOR) investigators. BMJ open;5(1):e006578. 2015.

11. Von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gøtzsche P, Vandenbroucke J. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies [published correction appears in Ann Intern Med; 148: 168]. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573-7. . 2008.

12. Magno MB, de Paiva Cabral Tristao SK, Jural LA, Aguiar Sales Lima SO, Coqueiro RDS, Maia LC. Does dental trauma influence the social judgment and motivation to seek dental treatment by children and adolescents? Development, validation, and application of an instrument for the evaluation of traumatic dental injuries and their consequences. Int J Paediatr Dent;29(4):474-88. 2019.

13. Heller GZ, Manuguerra M, Chow R. How to analyze the Visual Analogue Scale: Myths, truths and clinical relevance. Scand J Pain;13:67-75. 2016.

14. Lehmann EL. Nonparametrics: Statistical methods based on ranks. New York: Springer; 2006.

15. Cuthbert MI, Melamed BG. A screening device: children at risk for dental fears and management problems. ASDC J. Dent. Child;49(6):432-6.1982.

16. Cademartori MG, Cara G, Pinto GDS. Validity of the Brazilian version of the Dental Subscale of Children’s Fear Survey Schedule. Int J Paediatr Dent;29(6):736-47. 2019.

17. Coluci MZO, Alexandre NMC, Milani D. Construção de instrumentos de medida na área da saúde. Ciênc. Saúde Colet;20:925-36. 2015.

18. Eduardo AHA, dos Santos CB, Carvalho AMP, de Carvalho EC. Validation of the Brazilian version of the Quality of Recovery-40 Item questionnaire. Acta Paul. Enferm.;29(3):253-9. 2016.

19. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use: Oxford University Press, USA; 2015.

20. Yahyaoglu O, Baygin O, Yahyaoglu G, Tuzuner T. Effect of Dentists’ Appearance Related with Dental Fear and Caries aStatus in 6-12 Years Old Children. J Clin Pediatr Dent;42(4):262-8. 2018.

21. Mistry D, Tahmassebi J. Children’s and parents’ attitudes towards dentists’ attire. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent;10(4):237-40. 2009.

22. Ram D, Hermida ML, Jerozolimsky AB, Slav O-Y, Wang H-Y, Abbate FP, et al. Children’s Preferences for Pediatric Dentist Attire: A Multicenter Study. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 42(3):195-202. 2018.

23. Souza-Constantino AM, Claudia de Castro Ferreira Conti A, Capelloza Filho L, Marta SN, Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin R. Patients’ preferences regarding age, sex, and attire of orthodontists. J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;154(6):829-34.e.12018.

24. Alsarheed M. Children’s Perception of Their Dentists. Eur J Dent. 2011;5(2):186-90.

25. Ellore VPK, Mohammed M, Taranath M, Ramagoni NK, Kumar V, Gunjalli G. Children and parent’s attitude and preferences of dentist’s attire in pediatric dental practice. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent;8(2):102. 2015.

26. Ravikumar D, Gurunathan D, Karthikeyan S, Subbramanian E, Samuel VA. Age and environment determined children’s preference towards dentist attire-A cross-sectional study. J Clin Diagn Res;10(10):ZC16. 2016.

27. Celine G, Cho V, Kogan A, Anthonappa R, King N. Eye-tracking in dentistry: What do children notice in the dentist? J Dent;78:72-5. . 2018.

28. Babaji P, Chauhan P, Churasia VR, Kaur T, Singh S, Augustine M. A cross-sectional evaluation of children preference for dentist attire and syringe type in reduction of dental anxiety. Dent Res J (Isfahan);15(6):391-6. 2018.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top