Article Data

  • Views 955
  • Dowloads 223

Original Research

Open Access

Clinical Measurement of Maximum Mouth Opening in Children Aged 6-12

  • Syed Aliya1
  • Harsimran Kaur1
  • Nishita Garg2
  • Rishika1
  • Ramakrishna Yeluri1,*,

1Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry,Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College & Research Centre, Uttar Pradesh, India

2Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Dental Institute, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Jharkhand, India

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-45.3.12 Vol.45,Issue 3,July 2021 pp.216-220

Published: 01 July 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Ramakrishna Yeluri E-mail: drramakrishnay@gmail.com kittypedo@yahoo.com

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical maximum mouth opening in children and its correlation with age, and sex. Study Design: Three hundred children of age 6–12 years, from different schools of Moradabad city were included. The participants were divided into three groups based on their age i.e Group 1 (n=100) 6–8 years, Group 2 (n=100) 8–10 years and Group 3 (n=100) 10–12 yrs. Three recordings of maximum mouth opening (MMO) were obtained using digital vernier caliper and the mean of three was considered as the MMO of that child. The data was analyzed using Spearman correlation, ANOVA with post- hoc Bonferroni test. The significance level was predetermined at p≤0.05 .Results: The mean MMO for children of Moradabad of aged 6–8yrs in boys is 39.87 ± 4.91 mm and in girls is 36.85± 4.09 mm. In 8–10 yeas age group, the MMO in boys is 44.5± 5.1 mm and in girls 41.77± 5.24 mm. In 10–12 year age group, the MMO in boys is 49.63± 5.56 mm and in girls is 49.33±5.32 mm respectively. The MMO was found to be higher in boys in all the three age groups. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in values of MMO in all the three age groups with boys having higher MMO values when compared to girls. Varying range of MMO values was observed within three age groups.

Keywords

Children; Mouth opening; Vernier caliper

Cite and Share

Syed Aliya,Harsimran Kaur,Nishita Garg,Rishika,Ramakrishna Yeluri. Clinical Measurement of Maximum Mouth Opening in Children Aged 6-12. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021. 45(3);216-220.

References

1.Fatima J, Kaul R, Jain P, Saha S, Halder S, Sarkar S. Clinical measurement of maximum mouth opening in children of Kolkata and its relation with different facial types. J Clin Diagn Res. 10(8):ZC01-ZC05, 2016.

2. Kumar A, Dutta S, Signh J, Mehta R, Hooda A, Namdev R. Clinical measurement of maximal mouth opening in children: A pioneer method. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 37(2):171-5, 2012.

3. Miller JV, Bookhan V, Brummer D, Singh JC. A mouth opening index for patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehab.26:534-7, 1999.

4. Park MW, Eo MY, Seo BY, Nguyen TTH, Kim SM. Gap arthroplasty with active mouth opening exercises using an interocclusal splint in temporomandibular joint ankylosis patients. J Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg.41:18, 2019.

5. Chen CT, Feng CH, Tsay PK, Lai JP, Chen YR. Functional outcomes following surgical treatment of bilateral mandibular condylar fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 40:38-44, 2011.

6. Al –Nawas B, Walter C, Morbach T, Siegel E, Maeurer M, Krummenauer F. Clinical and microbiological efficacy of moxifloxacin versus amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid in severe odontogenic abscesses: a pilot study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 28:75-82, 2009.

7. Acosta-Feria M, Villar-Puchades R, Haro-Luna JJ, Ramso-Medina B, Gracia-Solano E. Limitation of mouth opening caused by osteochondroma of the coronoid process. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.112:e64-e68, 2011.

8. Kaneyama K, Segami N, Hatta T. Congenital deformities and developmental abnormalities of the mandibular condyle in the temporomandibular joint. Congen Abnor.48:118–125, 2008.

9. Zawawi KH, Al -Badawi EA, Lobo SL, Melis M, Mehta NR. An index for the measurement of normal maximum mouth opening. J Can Dent Assoc. 69(11):737-741, 2003.

10. Yoshitake H. Development of the new instrument for measurement of mouth opening and mandibular movement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol.30:488-91, 2018

11. Mezitis M, Rallis G, Zachariades N. The normal range of mouth opening. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.47:1028-9, 1989.

12. Abou- Atme YS , Chedid N, Marcello M, Zawawi KH. Clinical measurement of normal maximum mouth opening in children. J Craniomand Prac. 26(3):191-196, 2008.

13. Muto T, Kanazawa M. The relationship between maximal jaw opening and skeleton: A cephalometric study. J Oral Rehab.23:22-24, 1996.

14. Muller L, Waes HV, Langerweger C, Molinari L, Saurenmann R. Maximal mouth opening capacity: percentiles for healthy children 4-17 years of age. J Pediatr Rheumatol.11:17, 2013.

15. Khare N, Patil SB, Kale SM, Sumeet J, Sonali I, Sumeet B. Normal mouth opening in an adult Indian population. J Maxillofac Oral Surg.11(3):309- 313, 2012.

16. Nevakari K. “Elapsiopraearticularis” of temporomandibular joint. A pantomographic study of the so –called physiological subluxation. Acta Odontol Scand.18:123-170, 1960.

17. Sheppard IM, Sheppard SM. Maximum incisal opening: a diagnostic index. J Dent Med. 20:13-15, 1965.

18. Ingervall B. Range of movement of mandible in children. J Dent Res.78:311- 322, 1970.

19. Agerberg G. Maximum mandibular movements in young men and women. Sven Tandlak Tidskr. 67:81-100, 1974.

20. Hiremath SS. Biostatistics. In: Hiremath SS Textbook of preventive and community dentistry. India, Elsevier p. 511-520, 2011.

21. Landtwing K. Evaluation of the normal range of vertical mandibular opening in children and adolescents with special reference to age and stature. J Max Fac Surg.6:157-162, 1978.

22. Gallagher G, Gallagher V, Whelton H, Cronin M. The normal range of mouth opening in an Irish population. J Oral Rehab.31:110-116, 2004.

23. Kumari S, Reddy DC, Paul ST. The normal range of maximum incisal opening in pediatric population and its association with physical variables. Ann Afr Med.18:153-7, 2019.

24. Yao KT, Lin CC, Hung CH. Maximum mouth opening of ethnic Chinese in Taiwan. J Dent Sci .4(1):40-44, 2009.

25. Hirsch C, John MT, Lautenschlager C, List T. Mandibular jaw movement capacity in 10 -17 yr old children and adolescents: normative values and the influence of gender, age, and temporomandibular disorders. Eur J Oral Sci.114:465-470, 2006.

26. Vanderas AP. Mandibular movements and their relationship to age and body height in children with or without clinical signs of craniomandibular dysfunction: Part IV: A comparative study. J Dent Child.59:338-41, 1992.

27. Muhtarogullary M, Demirel F, Saygyly G. Temporomandibular disorder in Turkish children with mixed and primary dentition: Prevalence of sign and symptoms. Turkish J Pediatr.46:159-163, 2004.

28. Sridhar M, Jeevanandham G. Clinical measurement of maximum mouth opening in children and its relation with different facial types. Drug Invent Today. 10(2):3069-3073, 2018.

29. Cortese SG, Oliver LM, Biondi AM. Determination of range of mandibular movements in children without temporomandibular disorders. J Craniomand Prac. 25(3):200-205, 2007.

30. Pullinger AG, Liu SP, Low G, Tay D. Differences between sexes in maximum jaw opening when corrected to body size. J Oral Rehab.14:291- 299, 1987.

31. Weinstein IR. Normal range of mouth opening. Letters to the editor. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.42:347, 1984.

32. Helkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. Index for anamestic and clinical dysfunction and occlusal state. Swed Dent J.67:101-121, 1983.

33. Dijkstra PU, Bont LGM, Stegnenga B, Boering G. Angle of mouth opening measurement: Reliability of a technique for a temporomandibular joint mobility assessment. J Oral Rehab. 22(4):263-8, 1995.

34. Reicheneder C, Proff P, Baumert U, Gedrange T. Comparison of maximum mouth-opening capacity and condylar path length in adults and children during the growth period. Ann Anat. 190(4):344-50, 2008.

35. Rothenberg LH. An analysis of maximum mandibular movements, craniofacial relationships and temporomandibular joint awareness in children. Angle Orthod.61:103–12, 1991.

36. De Vis H, Boever JAD, Cauwenberghe PV. Epidemiologic survey of functional conditions of masticatory system in Belgian children aged 3-6 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 12(3):203-207, 1984.

37. Sousa LM, Nagamine HM, Chaves TC, Grossi DB, Regalo SC, Oliveira AS. Evaluation of mandibular range of motion in Brazilian children and its correlation to age, height, weight, and gender. Braz Oral Res.22:61-6, 2008.

38. Higbie EJ, Seidel Cobb D, Taylor LF, Cummings GS. Effect of head position on vertical mandibular opening. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.29:127–30, 1999.

39. Kuroda K, Saitoh I, Inada E, Takemoto Y, Iwasaki T, Iwase Y et al. Head motions may help mouth opening in children. Arch Oral Biol.56:102-107, 2011.

40. Uritani D. Effect of temporomandibular disorder symptoms on mouth opening in two head positions: A comparative study. Rigakuryohu Kagaku.24:919-923, 2009.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top