Assessment of Dental Arch Parameters in Turkish Twins

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to variations in dental dimensions in a sample of Turkish twins, and to estimate heritability using dental casts. Study design: The study samples were selected from the twin children between 3–15 years old who referred for their first dental examination. Fifty nine monozygotic and one hundred and forty three dizygotic twin pairs were examined in the study. The alginate impression material used to create the plaster model of maxilla and mandible. Anterior arch width, posterior arch width, arch length and arch circumference were measured on models prepared from measurements taken for both maxilla and mandible with digital caliper. The similarities and differences of the measurements were compared between pairs of twins and zygocytes. Morever, the effects of bad oral habits, bruxism, a result of psychosocial factors on measurements were examined. Statistical analysis was performed using Paired T Test, Wilcoxon Test and Mann Whitney U test.

Results: A total of 404 dental models of 118 (29.2%) monozygotic and 286 (70.8%) dizygotic twins were evaluated. There was no statistical difference between sibling pairs in both monozygotic and dizygotic twins. The measurement similarity between twin siblings differed according to zygosity in all measurements (p<0.05). It has been observed that the finger sucking and mouth breathing affect the dental arch measurements (p<0.05). Conclusion: These results indicate that the differences in dental arch dimensions between monozygotic twin pairs are less than the difference between dizygotic twin pairs.

Twin; Arch dimension; Genetic factors

1. Hughes T, Dempsey P, Richards L, Townsend G. Genetic analysis of deciduous tooh size in Australian twins. Arch Oral Biol 2000;45:997-1004.

2. Hughes T, Thomas C, Richards L, Townsend. A study of occlusal variation in the primary dentition of Australian twins and singletons. Arch Oral Biol 2001;46:857-64.

3. Eguchi S, Townsend GC, Richards LC, Hughes T and Kasai K. Genetic contribution to dental arch size variation in Australian twins. Arch Oral Biol 2004;49:1015-24.

4. Svalkauskiene V, Smigelskas K, Salomskiene L, Andriuskeviciute I, Salomskiene A, Vasiliauskas A et al. Heritability estimates of dental arch parameters in Lithunian twins. Stomatologija, Baltic Dent Maxillofac J 2015;17:3-8.

5. Townsend G, Brook A. Genetic, epigenetic and environmental influences on dental development. Ortho Tribune 2008;3:3-6.

6. Brook AH, Griffin RC, Townsend G, Levisianos Y, Russell J, Smith RN. Variability and patterning inpermanent tooth size of four human ethnic groups. Arch Oral Biol 2009;54:579-85.

7. Lauweryns I. Carels C, Vlietinck R. The use of twins in dentofacial genetic research. Am J Orthodontic Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:33-8.

8. Potter RH, Nance WE, Davis WB. A twin study of dental dimension. II. Independent gentic determinants. Am J Phys Anthropol 1976;61:397-412.

9. Dempsey PJ, Townsend GC. Genetic and environmental contributions to variation in human tooth size. Heredity 2001;86:685-93.

10. Higgins D, Hughes T, James H, Townsend G. Strong genetic influence on hypocone expression of permanent maxillary molars in South Australian twins. Dental Anthropol 2009;22: 1-7.

11. Townsend G, Bockmann M, Hughes T, Brook A. Genetic, environmental and epigenetic influences on variation in human tooth number, size and shape. Odontology 2012;100:1-9.

12. Townsend G, Hughes T, Luciano M, Bockmann M, Brook A. Genetic and environmental influences on human dental variation: a critical evaluation of studies involving twins. Arch Oral Biol 2009;54:45-51.

13. Hughes TE, Townsend GC, Pinkerton SK, Bockmann MR, Seow WK, Brook AH, Richards LC, Mihailidis S, Ranjitkar S, Lekkas D. The teeth and faces of twins: providing insights into dentofacial development and oral health for practicing oral health professionals. Aust Dent J 2014;59:101-16.

14. Townsend GC, Corruccini RS, Richards LC, Brown T. Genetic and environmental determinants of dental occlusal variation in South Australian twins. Aust Orthod J 1988;10:231–5.

15. Harris EF and Johnson MG. Heritability of craniometric and occlusal variables: a longitudinal sib analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;99:258-68.

16. Cassidy KM, Harris EF, Tolley EA, Keim RG. Genetic influence on dental arch form in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 1998;68:445-54.

17. Othman S, Xinwei E, Lim S, Jamaludin M, Mohamed N, Yusof Z, Shoaib L, Hussein N. Comparison of arch form between ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia. Korean J Orthod 2012;42:47-54.

18. Rahmawati AD, Rus Sudarso IS, Pramono D, Arguni E. Correlation between age and dental arch dimension of Javanese children. Dent J 2020;53:93-8.

19. Shahid F, Khursheed Alam M, Khamis MF, Matsuda S, Shoumura M, Osuga N. Crown dimension in relation to arch perimeter, arch length and arch width in ideal occlusion: A digital Model Study. J Hard Tissue Biol 2015;24:289-98.

20. Kurushima Y, Ikebe K, Matsuda K, Enoki K, Ogata S, Yamashita M et al. Influence of genetic and environmental factors on oral diseases and function in aged twins. Oral Rehabil 2015;42:49-56.

21. Koyoumdjisky Kaye E, Zilberman Y, Zeevi Z. A comparative study of tooth and dental arch dimensions in Jewish children of different ethnic descent. Am J Phys Anthropol 1976;44:437-43.

22. Harris ES, Smith RJ. A study of occlusion and arch width in families. Am J Orthod 1980;78:155-63.

23. Corruccini RS, Potter RHY. Genetic analysis of occlusal variation in twins. Am J Orthod 1980;78:140-54.

24. Boraas JC, Messer LB, Till MJ. A genetic contribution to dental caries, occlusion and morphology as demonstrated by twins reared apart. J Dent Res 1988;67:1150-5.

25. Richards LC, Townsend GC, Brown T, Burgess VB. Dental arch morphology in south Australian twins. Archs Oral Biol 1990;35:983-9.

26. Ling JYK, Wong RWK. Dental arch widths of southern Chinese. Angle Orthod 2009;79:54-63.

27. Normando D, Almeida Santos HG, Abdo Quintao CC. Comparisons of tooth sizes, dental arch dimensions, tooth wear, and dental crowding in Amazonian indigenous people. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;5:839-46.

28. Hu JR, Nakasima A, Takahama Y. Familial similarity in dental arch form and tooth position. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1991:12:33-40.

29. D’onofrio L. Oral dysfunction as a cause of malocclusion. Orthod and Craniofac Res; 2019;22:43-8.

30. Oyamada Y, Ikeuchi T, Arakaki M, Hino R, Ono M, Kobayashi M et al. Finger sucking callus as useful indicator for malocclusion in young children. Ped Dent J; 2016; 26:103-8.

31. Petraccone Caixeta AC, Andrade I, Junqueira Pereira TB, Franco LP, Gonçalves Becker HM, Quiroga Souki B. Dental arch dimensional changes after adenotonsillectomy in prepubertal children. Am J Orthod and Dentofacial Orthop, 2014;145:461-8.

32. Rahmawati AD, Rus Sudarso IS, Pramono D, Arguni E. Correlation between age and dental arch dimension of Javanese children. Dental J; 2020;53:93-98