Article Data

  • Views 994
  • Dowloads 259

Original Research

Open Access

Resorbable Collagen Barrier Impeding the Extrusion of Obturating Material in Primary Molars Undergoing Resorption – A Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Mishra Neha Sanjeev1
  • Harsimran Kaur1,*,
  • Sandeep Singh Mayall1
  • Rishika1
  • Ramakrishna Yeluri1

1Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Delhi Road, Moradabad – 244001, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-45.5.4 Vol.45,Issue 5,November 2021 pp.312-316

Published: 05 November 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Harsimran Kaur E-mail: simran2871@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of placing a resorbable collagen barrier in impeding the extrusion of obturation material in primary molars undergoing resorption. Study design: All the 94 canals in 47 mandibular molars were allocated to 2 groups- Group ‘A’- 47 canals with collagen barrier (Test group) and Group ‘B’- 47 canals without collagen barrier (Control group) based on randomization protocol. Pulpectomy was performed and obturation of both test and control canals were radiographically assessed. Pearson’s chi – square test was applied to analyze the results. The significance level was predetermined at p < 0.05. Results: Among the test group, 93.6% of the canals showed no extrusion while, 6.4% showed visible extrusion of the material outside the apex. In the control group, 83% showed no extrusion whereas 17% of the canals showed visible extrusion outside the apex. But no significant difference was noted (p>0.05). Conclusion: The placement of resorbable collagen barrier in the apical third of the canal prevented the extrusion of obturating material beyond the apex in resorbing primary molars.

Keywords

Apical barrier; Collagen plug; Primary molars; Pulpectomy; Resorption

Cite and Share

Mishra Neha Sanjeev,Harsimran Kaur,Sandeep Singh Mayall,Rishika,Ramakrishna Yeluri. Resorbable Collagen Barrier Impeding the Extrusion of Obturating Material in Primary Molars Undergoing Resorption – A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021. 45(5);312-316.

References

1. Dandashi MB, Nazif MM, Zullo T, Elliott MA, Schneider LG, Czonstkowsky M. An in vitro comparison of three endodontic techniques for primary incisors. Pediatr Dent,1993 :15(4):254-256.

2. Matsuda E. Ultrastructural and cytochemical study of the odontoclasts in physiologic root resorption of human deciduous teeth. Electron Microsc,1992, 41(3):131-140.

3. Prove SA, Symson AL, Meyers IA. Physiological root resorption of primary molars. Pediatr Dent, 1992; 16(3): 202-206.

4. Obersztyn A. Experimental investigation of factor causing resorption of deciduous teeth. J Dent Res,1963; 42(2):660-674.

5. Kronfeld R. The resorption of the roots of the deciduous teeth. Dent Cosmos 74:103-120,1932.

6. Primosch R, Ahmadi A, Setzer B, Guelmann M. A retrospective assessment of zinc-oxide eugenol pulpectomies in vital maxillary primary incisors successfully treated with composite crowns. Pediatr Dent,2005; 27(6):470-477,2005.

7. Britto L, Jiang J, Vertucci F. The role of biological modulators in endodontic therapy. Rev Fac Odontol Bauru 10(4):201-208,2002.

8. Fuks AB, Michaeli Y, Sofer-Saks B, Shoshan S. Enriched collagen solution as a pulp dressing in pulpotomized teeth in monkeys. Pediatr Dent,1984; 6(4):243-247.

9. Stenzel KH, Miyata T, Rubin AL. Collagen as a biomaterial. Annu Rev Biophysic Biomeng, 1974; 3(1):231–253.

10. Shoulders MD, Raines RT. Collagen structure and stability. Annu Rev Biochem,2009; 78:929-958.

11. Parenteau-Bareil R, Gauvin R, Berthod F. Collagen-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Materials ,2010;3(3):1863–1887.

12. Yu SM, Li Y, Kim D. Collagen mimetic peptides: progress towards functional applications. Soft Matter ,2010;7(18):7927–7938.

13. Johnson MS, Britto LR, Guelmann M. Impact of a biological barrier in pulpectomies of primary molars. Pediatr Dent 2006; 28(6):506-510.

14. Mulia DP, Indiarti IS, Budiarjo SB. Effect of root resorption of primary teeth on the development of its permanent successors: an evaluation of panoramic radiograph in 7-8 year old boy. J Phys Conf Ser,2006; 1073(3):1-7,2018.

15. Shindova MP, Belcheva AB. Behaviour evaluation scales for pediatric dental patients–review and clinical experience. Folia Med ,2014; 56(4):264-270.

16. Hurwitz EE, Simon M, Vinta SR, Zehm CF, Shabot SM, Minhajuddin A et al. Adding examples to the ASA-physical status classification improves correct Assignment to Patients. Anesthesiol, 2017; 126(4):614-622.

17. Goerig AC, Camp JH. Root canal treatment in primary teeth: a review. Pediatr Dent,1983; 5(1):33-37.

18. Guelmann M, McEachern M, Turner C. Pulpectomies in primary incisors using three delivery systems: an in vitro study. J ClinPediatr Dent,2004; 28(4):323‐326.

19. Bawazir OA, Salama FS. Clinical evaluation of root canal obturation methods in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent, 2006; 28(1):39‐47.

20. Walia T, Ghanbari A, Mathew S, Ziadlou A. An in vitro comparison of three delivery techniques for obturation of root canals in primary molars. Eur Arch Pediat Dent, 2016; 18(1):17-23.

21. Coll JA, Sadrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent ,1996; 18(1):57-63.

22. Garcia ME, Contreras KR, Rodriguez SR, Perez MP, Cristerna BC, Guillen AP. Eugenol toxicity in human dental pulp fibroblast of primary teeth eugenol toxicity in human dental pulp fibroblast of primary teeth. J Clinic Pediatr Dent, 2016; 40(4):312-318.

23. Barja-Fidalgo F, Moutinho-Ribeiro M, Oliveira MA, Oliveira BH. A systematic review of root canal filling materials for deciduous teeth: is there an alternative for zinc oxide eugenol. ISRN Dent 2011 doi:10.5402/2011/367318.

24. Kakade A, Shetty H, Santosh A, Mali S, Badnaware S, Deshmukh B. Tamponade effect of resorbable biological barrier in quality of oburation in primary molar. J Invest Clin Dent ,2019; 10(4):1-5.

25. Moskovitz M, Sammara E, Holan G. Success rate of root canal treatment in primary molars. J Dent,2005; 33:41-47.

26. Ozalp N, Saroglu I, Sönmez H. Evaluation of various root canal filling materials in primary molar pulpectomies: An in vitro study. Am J Dent 18(6):347-350,2005.

27. Petel R, Moskovitz M, Tickotsky N, Halabi A, Goldstein J, Haddad YH.Cytotoxicity and proliferative effects of iodoform containing root canal filling material on RAW 264.7 macrophage and RKO epithelial cell lines. Arch Oral Bio, 2013; 58(1):75-78.

28. Vanka A, Ravi K, Shashikiran N. Apexification with MTA using internal matrix: Report of 2 cases. J ClinPediatr Dent ,2010; 34(3):197-200.

29. ColoPlug (Resorbable Collagen Plug). [package insert on Internet]. Salem (Tamilnadu, India): ColoGenesis [cited 2021 February 15]. Available from: http://www.cologenesis.net/coloplug-collagen-sponge.html.

30. Peretz B, Nisan S, Herteanu L, Blumer S. Root resorption patterns of primary mandibular molars and location of the premolar successors: a radiographic evaluation. Pediatr Dent,2013; 35(5):426-429.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top