Article Data

  • Views 862
  • Dowloads 160

Original Research

Open Access

SHED´s Response to Various Pulpotomy Materials: Cytotoxicity and Gene Expression Analysis

  • Viral Maru1,*,
  • Omkar Shetty2
  • Uma Dixit1
  • Vishal G Warke3
  • Mansi Khande4
  • Shraddha Mane4

1Dept Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry, D y Patil School of Dentistry, Navi Mumbai, India

2D Y Patil School of Dentistry,Navi Mumbai, India

3Research and development, Cell Culture and Immunology, HiMedia Laboratory, India

4HiMedia Laboratory, Ghatkopar, India

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-45.6.7 Vol.45,Issue 6,December 2021 pp.406-413

Published: 01 December 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Viral Maru E-mail: viralmaru@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the cytotoxicity and genetic expression of SHEDs cultured in eluates of various calcium silicate based pulpotomy materials. Study design : MTT assay, flow cytometry, alizarin red staining and scratch assay was used to assess the cellular viability, apoptosis, calcium matrix deposits and cell migration respectively. The gene expression of ALP, OCN and BMP -2, were measured with rtPCR. One way ANNOVA and Bonferroni post test was used for statistical analysis. Results: MTT assay analysis reported that all the test specimen had no cytotoxic effects. The highest number of live cells [ % ] was found in RetroMTA. The highest percentage of cell migration was observed in SHEDs cultured in EndoCem Zr. The mean absorbance for calcium matrix deposition was higher or similar in all test specimens, when compared to control groups. The expression of BMP -2 and OCN were significantly higher in cells exposed to RetroMTA and NeoMTA respectively after 24 hrs of incubation. After 72 hrs of incubation the mRNA expression of ALP was significantly higher in MTA. Conclusions: SHEDs cultured in eluates of various calcium silicate based cements exhibited cytocompatibility and maintained odontogenic like phenotype differentiation in SHEDs.

Keywords

Cytotoxicity; SHEDs; MTA; Biodentine; EndoCem Zr; NeoMTA; RetroMTA; Gene expression

Cite and Share

Viral Maru,Omkar Shetty,Uma Dixit,Vishal G Warke,Mansi Khande,Shraddha Mane. SHED´s Response to Various Pulpotomy Materials: Cytotoxicity and Gene Expression Analysis. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2021. 45(6);406-413.

References

1. Ritwik P. A review of pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2013; 41:585-95.

2. Parisay I, Ghoddusi J, Forghani M. A review on vital pulp therapy in primary teeth. Iran Endod J. 2015; 10:6-15.

3. Kisby L. Vital pulp therapy in primary teeth: An Update. Dent Today 2016;35: 112-3.

4. Prati C, Gandolfi MG. Calcium silicate bioactive cements: Biological perspectives and clinical applications. Dent Mater. 2015;31:351-70.

5. Gandolfi MG, Spagnuolo G, Siboni F, Procino A, Rivieccio V, Pelliccioni GA et al. Calcium silicate/calcium phosphate biphasic cements for vital pulp therapy: chemical-physical properties and human pulp cells response. Clin Oral Invest. 2015;19:2075-89.

6. Nair P.N.R., Duncan, H.F., Pitt Ford, T.R., Luder, H.U. Histological, ultrastructural and quantitative investigations on the response of healthy human pulps to experimental capping with mineral trioxide aggregate: a randomized controlled trial. Int. Endod. J.2008; 41: 128–50.

7. Hench LL, West JK. Biological application of bioactive glasses. Life Chem Rep.1996;13:187-41.

8. Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomater. 2006;27:2907-15.

9. Rodríguez-Lozano FJ, Bueno C, Insausti CL, Meseguer L, Ramirez MC, Blanquer M et al. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues. Int Endod J. 2011;44:800-6.

10. Collado G, Bernal D, Sanchez O, Seltenench O, Muro A, Lozano A et al. Cytotoxicity and bioactivity of various pulpotomy materials on stem cells from human exfoliated primary teeth. Int Endod J. 2017;50(S2):e19-e30.

11. Goyal P, Pandit IK, Gugnani N, Gupta M, Goel R, Gambhir RS. Clinical and radiographic comparison of various medicaments used for pulpotomy in primary molars: A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Dent. 2016;10:315-20.

12. Rajasekharan S, Martens L, Vandenbulcke J, Jacquet W, Bottenberg P, Cauwels R. Efficacy of three different pulpotomy agents in primary molars–A randomized control trial. Int Endod J. 2017;50(3):215-28.

13. Percinoto C, Castro AM, Pinto LM. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies employing calcium hydroxide and MTA. Gen Dent. 2006;54:258-61.

14. Luo Z, Li D, Kohli MR, Yu Q, Kim S, He WX. Effect of Biodentine on the proliferation, migration and adhesion of human dental pulp stem cells. J Dent. 2014; 42:490-7.

15. Bortoluzzi EA, Niu LN, Palani CD, El-Awady AR, Hammond BD, Pei DD et al. Cytotoxicity and osteogenic potential of silicate calcium cements as potential protective materials for pulpal revascularization. Dent Mater. 2015;31:510-22.

16. Chung C, Kim E, Song M, Park JW, Shin SJ. Effects of two fast setting calcium silicate cements on cell viability and angiogenic factor release in human pulp derived cells. Odontol. 2016;104:143-51.

17. Tomas–Catala C, Gonzalez MC, Garcia – Bernal D , Onate – Sanchez RE, Forner L, Llena C et al. Biocompatibility of new pulp capping materials NeoMta plus, MTA Repair HP & Biodentine on human dental pulp stem cells. J Endod. 2018;44(1):126-32.

18. Kang CM, Kim SH, Shin Y, Lee HS, Lee JH, Kim GT et al. A randomized controlled trial of ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA and RetroMTA for pulpotomy in primary molars. Oral Dis. 2015;21:785-91.

19. Cornélio AG, Rodrigues EM, Salles LP, Mestieri LB, Faria G, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM et al. Bioactivity of MTA Plus, Biodentine and an experimental calcium silicate-based cement on human osteoblast-like cells. Int Endod J. 2017;50(1):39-47.

20. Nagendrababu V, Murray PE, Ordinola-Zapata R, Peters OA, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF et al. PRILE 2021 guidelines for reporting laboratory studies in Endodontology: a consensus-based development. Int J Endod. 2021.

21. Mead R. 1988. The design of experiments. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. 620 p.

22. Use of International Standard ISO-10993, ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing’ (blue book memo)” (PDF). fda.gov. FDA. Retrieved 23 January 2017.

23. Slompo C, Peres –Buzalaf C, Gasque KC,Damante CA, Ordinola Z, Duarte MA et al. Experimental calcium silicate based cement with and without zirconium oxide modulates fibroblasts viability. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(6):587-91.

24. Freshney I R, Stacy G N, Auerbach J M. 2007.Culture of Human Stem Cellls. Wiley. USA. 193-203.

25. Stockert JC, Horobin RW,Colombo LL, Blazquez – Castro A. Tetrazolium salts and formazan products in cell biology: Viability assessment, fluorescence imaging and labelling perspectives. Acta Histochemica. 2018;120(3):159-67.

26. Van Engeland M, Nieland LJ, Ramaekers FC, Schutte B, Reutelingsperger CP. Annexin V- affinity assay: a review on an apoptosis detection system based on phosphatidylserine exposure. Cytometry 1998;31(1):1-9.

27. Pijuan J, Barcelo C, Moreno D,Maiques O, Siso P, Marti R et al. In vitro cell migration, invasion and adhesion assays: from cell imaging to data analysis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:107.

28. Gregory C, Gunn W, Peister A, Prockop D. An alizarin red based assay of mineralization by adherent cells in culture: comparison with cetylpyridinium chloride extraction. Anal Biochem.2004;329:77-84.

29. Chomczynski P, Mackey K. Short technical report. Modification of trizol reagent procedure for isolation of RNA from Polysaccharide and proteoglycan rich sources. Biotech. 1995;19(6):942-5.

30. Wiame I, Remy S, Swennen R, Sagi L. Irreversible heat inactivation of DNase without RNA degradation. Biotech. 2000;29:252-56.

31. Vanguilder H. D., Vrana K. E., Freeman W.M. Twenty-five years of quantitative PCR for gene expression analysis. Biotech. 2008; 44(5),:619-25.

32. De Menezes JV, Takamori ER, Bijella MF, Granjeiro JM. In vitro toxicity of MTA compared with other primary teeth pulpotomy agents. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009;33:217-21.

33. Buttke TM, Mc Cubrey JA, Owen TC. Use of an aqueous soluble tetrazolium / formazan assay to measure viability and proliferation of lymphokine – dependent cell lines. J Immunol Methods 1993;157:233-40.

34. Jakub S, Benjamín V, Tomáš S, Sally K El-Din Mohamed, Romana I, Jaroslav M et.al. Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth –isolation, long term cultivation and phenotypical Analysis. Acta Medica. 2010;53(2):93–9.

35. Jaroslav Mokry, Tomas Soukup, Stanislav Micuda, Jana Karbanova, Benjamin Visek, Eva Brcakova et.al. Telomere Attrition Occurs during Ex Vivo Expansion of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010: 673513.

36. Razieh A, Farzaneh .S, Batool .H-B, Sayyed .H .Z-E, Fariba .H, Sayyed .M et.al. Phenotypic characterizations and comparison of adult dental stem cells with adipose-derived stem cells. Int J Prev Med. 2010;1(3):164-171.

37. Niepel M, Hafner M, Mills C, Subramanian K, Williams E, Chung M et al. A multicenter study on the reproducibility of drug response assays in mammalian cell lines. Cell. Systems 2019;9:35-48.

38. Maeda T, Suzuki A, Yuzawa S, Baby Y, KimuraY, Kato Y. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate induces osteoblastogenesis via Atf6. Bone Rep. 2015;2:36-43.

39. Dahake PT, Panpaliya NP, Kale YJ, Dadpe MV, Kendre SB, Bogar C. Response of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth to three bioinductive materials – An in vitro experimental study. Saudi Dent J. 2019;32(1):43-51.

40. Jung Y, Yoon Ji, Patel K, Lee Hae, Ma Lan, Kim J et al. Biological Effects of Tricalcium Silicate Nanoparticle-Containing Cement on Stem Cells from Human Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth. Nanomater. 2020;10:1373.

41. Ji-Yun J, Minji K, Soyeon A, Soyeon K, Wooksung K, Yaelim Kim et al.Tooth Discoloration after the Use of New Pozzolan Cement (Endocem) and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and the Effects of Internal Bleaching, J Endod. 2013; 39(12):1598-1602.

42. Tsai CI, Ke MC, Chen YH, Kuo HK, Yu HJ, Chen CT te al. Mineral trioxide aggregate affects cell viability and induces apoptosis of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth, BMC Pharmacol Toxicol.2018;19:21.

43. Hasweh N, Awidi A, Rajab L, Hiyasat A, Jafar H, Islam N, et al. Characterization of the biological effect of BiodentineTM on primary dental pulp stem cells. Indian J Dent Res. 2018;29:787-93.

44. Araujo L, Silva L, Feranandes A, Oliveria T, Cavalcanti B, Filho J et al. Effects of Mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine and calcium hydroxide on viability, proliferation, migration and differentiation of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26:e20160629.

45. Athanasiadou E, et al. Biological interactions of a calcium silicate based cement (Biodentine) with Stem Cells from Human Exfoliated Deciduous teeth. Dent Mater.2018;34(12):1797-1813.

46. Czabotar PE, Lessene G, Strasser A, Adams JM. Control of apoptosis by the BCL-2 protein family: implications for physiology and therapy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:49–63.

47. Ashkenazi A, Fairbrother WJ, Leverson JD, Souers AJ. From basic apoptosis discoveries to advanced selective BCL-2 family inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:273–84.

48. Jonkman J, Cathcart J, Xu F, Bartholini M, Amon J, Stevens K et al. An introduction to the wound healing assay using live-cell microscopy. Cell Adh Migr. 2014; 8(5): 440–51.

49. Gregory C, Gunn W, Peister A, Prockop D. An Alizarin red-based assay of mineralization by adherent cells in culture: comparison with cetylpyridinium chloride extraction. Anal Biochem. 2004;329(1):77-84.

50. Gu K, Smoke RH, Rutherford RB. Expression of genes for bone morphogenic proteins and receptors in human dental pulp. Arch Oral Biol. 1996;41:919-23.

51. Nakashima M. Induction of dentin in amputated pulp of dogs by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein -2 and -4 with collagen matric. Arch Oral Biol. 1994;39:1085-9.

52. Rodrigues EM, Cornelio ALG, Mestieri LB, Fuentes ASC, Salles LP, Junior CR. Human dental pulp cell responses to MTA and MTA P : cytotoxicity and gene expression analysis. Int J Endod J. 2016;50:780-789.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top