Evidence-based Update of Pediatric Dental Restorative Procedures: Preventive Strategies

Background: There has been significant advances in the understanding of preventive restorative procedures regarding the advantages and disadvantages for restorative procedures; the evidence for conservative techniques for deep carious lesions; the effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants; and the evidence for use of resin infiltration techniques. Aim: The intent of this review is to help practitioners use evidence to make decisions regarding preventive restorative dentistry in children and young adolescents. Study Design: This evidence-based review appraises the literature, primarily between the years 1995-2013, on preventive restorative strategies. The evidence was graded as to strong evidence, evidence in favor, or expert opinion by consensus of authors Results: The preventive strategy for dental caries includes individualized assessment of disease progression and management with appropriate preventive and restorative therapy. There is strong evidence that restoration of teeth with incomplete caries excavation results in fewer signs and symptoms of pulpal disease than complete excavation. There is strong evidence that sealants should be placed on pit and fissure surfaces judged to be at risk for dental caries, and surfaces that already exhibit incipient, non-cavitated carious lesions. There is evidence in favor for resin infiltration to improve the clinical appearance of white spot lesions. Conclusions: Substantial evidence exists in the literature regarding the value of preventive dental restorative procedures.

pediatric dentistry, preventive dentistry, evidence-based dentistry, dental materials

1. Weyant RJ, Tracy SL, Anselmo T, Beltrán-Aguilar ED, Donley KJ, Frese WA, et al. Topical fluoride for caries prevention: Executive summary of the updated recommendations and supporting systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc.144:1279-1291. 2013.

2. Tinanoff, N, Douglass J.M. Clinical decision-making for caries management of primary teeth. J. Dent Ed. 65; 1133-142. 2001.

3. Sheiham A. Impact of dental treatment on the incidence of dental caries in children and adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 25;104-112. 1997.

4. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on caries risk assessment and management for infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatr Dent.35:118-125. 2013.

5. National Institute of Health Consensus Development Statement: Diagnosis and Management of Dental Caries Throughout Life. NIH Consensus Statement. J Am Dent Assoc.132:1153-1161. 2001.

6. Nelson SJ. Wheeler’s Dental Anatomy, Physiology, and Occlusion. 9th ed. Philadelphia. W. B. Saunders, 2010.

7. Bader JD, Shugars DA. Understanding dentists’ restorative treatment decisions. J Pub Health Dent. 52;102-111. 1992.

8. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hanson, Pitts NB. The international caries detection and assessment system (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 35:170-178. 2007.

9. Beauchamp, J., Caufield, P. W., Crall, J. J., Donly, K., Feigal, R., Gooch, B., Ismail, A., Kohn, W., Siegal, M., Simonsen, R. Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc.139:257-68. 2008.

10. Downer MC, Azli NA, Bedi R, Moles DR, Setchell DJ. How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review. Brit Dent J.187:432-439. 1999.

11. Lenters M, van Amerongen WE, Mandari GJ. Iatrogenic damage to the adjacent surface of primary molars, in three different ways of cavity preparation. Eur. Archives Paed Dent.1:6-10. 2006.

12. Ricketts D, Lamont T, Innes NPT, Kidd E, Clarkson JE. Techniques for managing decay in teeth. The Cochrane Summaries. March 28, 2013, http:// summaries.cochrane.org/CD003808/techniques-for-managing-decay-inteeth,accessed Sept. 6, 2013.

13. Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E, Buerkle V, Garcia-Godoy F, Manhart J. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. Am J Dent .18:198-211. 2005.

14. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on Pulp Therapy for Primary and Immature Permanent Teeth. AAPD Reference Manual. 14, 35:235-242. 2013.

15. Bjørndal L, Reit C, Bruun G, Markvart M, Kjaeldgaard M, Näsman P, et al. Treatment of deep caries lesions in adults: randomized clinical trials comparing stepwise vs. direct complete excavation, and direct pulp capping vs. partial pulpotomy. Eur J Oral Sci .118:290-7. 2010.

16. Maltz M, Garcia R, Jardim JJ, de Paula LM, Yamaguti PM, Moura MS, et al. Randomized trial of partial vs. stepwise caries removal: 3-year follow-up. J Dent Res. 91:1026-31. 2012.

17. Maltz M, Jardim JJ, Mestrinho HD, Yamaguti PM, Podestá K, Moura MS, et al. Partial removal of carious dentine: a multicenter randomized controlled trial and 18-month follow-up results. Caries Res. 47:103-9. 2013.

18. Innes NP, Evans DJ, Stirrups DR. Sealing caries in primary molars: randomized control trial, 5-year results. J Dent Res. 90:1405-10. 2011.

19. Lula EC, Monteiro-Neto V,Alves CM, Ribeiro CC. Microbiological analysis after complete or partial removal of carious dentin in primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Caries Res. 43: 354-8. 2009.

20. Orhan AI, Oz FT, Orhan K. Pulp exposure occurrence and outcomes after 1- or 2-visit indirect pulp therapy vs complete caries removal in primary and permanent molars. Pediatr Dent.32:347-55. 2010.

21. Ricketts D, Lamont T, Innes NPT, Kidd E, Clarkson JE. Operative caries management in adults and children (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 3:54.

22. Foley J, Evans D, Blackwell A. Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Br Dent J.197(11):697-701. 2004.

23. Phonghanyudh A, Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Petersen PE. Clinical evaluation of three caries removal approaches in primary teeth: A randomized controlled trial. Community Dent Health. 29:173-8. 2012.

24. Schwendicke F, Dorfer CE, Paris S. Incomplete caries removal: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 92:306-14. 2013.

25. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis JW Jr, Ergle JW, Rueggeberg FA, Adair SM. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10. J Am Dent Assoc. 129:55-66. 1998.

26. Weintraub JA. Pit and fissure sealants in high-caries-risk individuals. J Dent Ed. 65:1084-90. 2001.

27. Simonsen RJ. Pit and fissure sealants. In: Clinical Applications of the Acid Etch Technique. Chicago, Ill: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc;19-42. 1978.

28. Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Forss H, Walsh T, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M, Worthington HV. Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3) ISSN: 1469-493X. 2013.

29. Llodra JC, Bravo M, Delgado-Rodriguez M, Baca P, Galvez R. Factors influencing the effectiveness of sealants: A meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol.21:261-8. 1993.

30. Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Hijri A, Nordblad A, Worthington H, Makela M. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev .(3):CD001830.18E. 2004.

31. Simonsen RJ. Retention and effectiveness of dental sealants after 15 years. J Am Dent Assoc. 122:34-42. 1991.

32. Romcke RG, Lewis, DW Maze BD, Vickerson RA. Retention and maintenance of fissure sealants over 10 years. J Can Dent Assoc. 56:235-7. 1990.

33. Oong EM, Griffin SO, Kohn W, Gooch BF, Caufield P. The effect of dental sealants on bacteria levels in caries lesions: a review of the evidence. J Am Dent Assoc.139:271-278. 2008.

34. Gooch BF, Griffin SO, Gray SK, Kohn WG, Rozier RG, Siegal M, et al. Preventing dental caries through school-based sealant programs: updated recommendations and reviews of evidence. J Am Dent Assoc.140: 415–423. 2009.

35. Griffin SO, Gray SK, Malvitz DM, Gooch BF. Caries risk in formerly sealed teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 140:40:415-423. 2009.

36. Muller-Bolla M, Lupi-Pégurier L, Tardieu C, Velly AM, Antomarchi C. Retention of resin-based pit and fissure sealants: a systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol.34: 321-36. 2006.

37. Wood AJ, Saravia ME, Farrington FH. Cotton roll isolation vs Vac-Ejector isolation. J Dent Child. 56:438-41. 1989.

38. Collette J, Wilson S, Sullivan D. A study of the Isolite system during sealant placement: Efficacy and patient acceptance. Pediatr Dent. 32:146-50. 2010.

39. Griffin SO, Jones K, Gray SK, Malvitz DM, Gooch BF. Exploring four-handed delivery and retention of resin-based sealants. J Am Dent Assoc.139:281-89. 2008.

40. Gray SK, Griffin SO, Malvitz DM, Gooch BF. A comparison of the effects of toothbrushing and handpiece prophylaxis on retention of sealants. J Am Dent Assoc.140:38-46. 2009.

41. Dhar V, Chen H, Evaluation of resin based and glass ionomer based sealants placed with or without tooth preparation-a two year clinical trial. Pediatr Dent.34:46-50. 2012.

42. Feigal RJ, Musherure P, Gillespie B, Levy-Polack M, Quelhas I, Hebling J. Improved sealant retention with bonding agents: A clinical study of two-bottle and single-bottle systems. J Dental Res.79:1850-56. 2000.

43. Maher MM, Elkashlan HI, El-Housseiny AA. Effectiveness of a self-etching adhesive on sealant retention in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent.35:351-4. 2013.

44. Kühnisch J, Mansmann U, Heinrich-Weltzien, R, Hickel R. Longevity of materials for pit and fissure sealing—Results from a meta-analysis. Dental Mat. 28:298-303. 2012.

45. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants on permanent teeth: An update of systematic review evidence. BMC Research Notes ISSN: 1756-0500, Jan 28; Vol. 4, pp. 22. 2011.

46. Hotuman E, Rølling I, Poulsen S. Fissure sealants in a group of 3-4-year-old children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 8:159-60. 1998.