Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Article Menu
Export Article
More by Authors Links
Article Data
- Views 706
- Dowloads 151
Original Research
Open AccessA New Classification System for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Infants to assist Presurgical Infant Orthopedics
A New Classification System for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Infants to assist Presurgical Infant Orthopedics
1Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Sawangi Wardha, Maharashtra
2,Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
3Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital
4Department of Prosthodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital
5Department of Opthamology, AVBRH, Sawangi Wardha, Maharashtra
*Corresponding Author(s): Daigavane PS E-mail: drpallavi_ortho@rediffmail.com pallavi.daigavane15@gmail.com
Abstract
The proposed advantages of pre-surgical naso-alveolar moulding (PNAM) are easy primary lip repair which heals under minimum tension reducing the scar formation and improving the aesthetic results in addition to reshaping of alar cartilage and improvement of nasal symmetry.However, the anatomy and alveolar morphology varies for each cleft child; the procedure for PNAM differs accordingly. In an attempt to categorize unilateral cleft lip and palate cases as per anatomical variations, a new classification system has been proposed. This classification aims to give an insight in unilateral cleft morphology based on which modification in PNAM procedure could be done.
Keywords
Pre-surgical naso alveolar molding; Classification, Unilateral cleft lip and palate
Cite and Share
Daigavane PS,Hazarey PV,Niranjane P,Vasudevan SD,Thombare BR,Daigavane S. A New Classification System for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Infants to assist Presurgical Infant Orthopedics. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2015. 39(3);231-234.
References
1. McNeil C. Orthodontic procedures in treatment of congenital cleft palate. Dent Rec.; 70:126. 1950
2. Burston WR. Early Orthodontics treatment of cleft palate conditions. Trans Br Soc Orthod Dent Practit.; 9:41-56. 1958.
3. Hotz M, Gnoinski W. Comprehensive care of the cleft lip and palate children at Zurich University: a preliminary report. Am J Orthod.; 70:481–504. 1976.
4. Huddart AG. Presurgical changes in Unilateral Cleft palate subjects. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.; 16:147-157. 1979
5. Weil J. Orthopedic growth, guidance and stimulation for patients with cleft lip and palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg.; 21:57-63. 1987.
6. Hockban W, Heinz K. Presurgical Orthopaedic treatment using hard plates. J Cranio maxillo fac Surg.; 17:2-4. 1989.
7. Suri S, Tompson BD. A modified Muscle – Activated Orthopedic Appli-ance for Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding in Infants with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 41:225-228, 2004.
8. Sameer Patil. PNAM – An Indian Experience. Paper read at, The 11th PG Convention of The Indian Orthodontic Society, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 25th – 27th February 2007.
9. Matsuo K, Hirose T, Otagiri T, Norose N. Repair of cleft lip with non surgical correction of Nasal deformity in the Early neonatal period J of Plast Reconstr Surg 83:25–31, 1989.
10. Barry H Grayson, Peter J. Coccaro, Augustus J.Valauri. Orthodontics in Cleft Lip and Palate Children. In McCarthy. Plastic Surgery, Cleft lip and palate and Craniofacial Anomalies, Volume 4, Ed 1. W. B. Saunders Company, United States of America, Chapter 57; 2878-2902, 1990.
11. Grayson BH, Santiago PE, Brecht LE, Cutting CB. Presurgical Nasoalve-olar Molding in Infants with Cleft Lip and Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofaci J 36:486 – 498, 1999.
12. Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilat-eral cleft lip and palate. Part II. Presurgical orthopaedics. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 24:24–32, 1987.
13. Vasant Radhakrishnan, VP Sabrinath, Pallavi Thombare(Daigavane), PV Hazarey, Raman Bonde, Anil Sheorain. Presurgical nasoalveolar molding assisted primary reconstruction in complete unilateral cleft lip palate infants. Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry; 34:267-274, 2010.
14. VP Sabrinath, Pallavi Thombare(Daigavane), PV Hazarey, Vasant Radhakrishnan, Sushil Agrekar. Changes in maxillary alveolar morphology with Naso alveolar molding. Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry; 35; 207-212, 2010.
15. Anne M, Kuijpers Jagtman, Ross E Long. State of the art. The influence of surgery and orthopedic treatment on maxillofacial growth and maxil-lary arch development inpatients treted for orafacila clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofaci J 3:527-539, 2000.
16. Barry H. Grayson and Pradip R. Shetye. Presurgical nasoalveolar moulding treatment in cleft lip and palate patients. Indian J Plast Surg 42:S56-S61, 2009.
17. Thabitha Rani S, Manjula M, Shreelakshmi N, Rajendra Reddy, Rajesh A. supporting the drive to thrive incleft lip and palate infants – a case report. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research; 7(12), 3102-3104, 2013.
18. Romero M, Latham R, Romance A, Salvan R: Treatment of an infant with a Rare cleft resolved with use of an Orthopedic appliance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 40:642–644,2003.
19. Catharina AMB, Martin A, van’t Hof, Birte Prahl-Andersen, Iris VD, Anne MKJ. Infant Orthopedics Has No Effect on Maxillary Arch Dimen-sions in the Deciduous Dentition of Children with Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate (Dutchcleft) Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 43:665–672, 2006.
20. Charlotte P, Birte Prahl-Andersen, Martin A. van’t Hof, Anne MKJ. Infant Orthopedics and Facial Appearance: A Randomized Clinical Trial (Dutchcleft) Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 43:659–664, 2006.
21. Masarei AG, Wade A, M. Mars, Sommerlad BC, D. Sell. A Randomized Control Trial Investigating the Effect of Presurgical Orthopedics on Feeding in Infants with Cleft Lip and/or Palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 44:182–193, 2007.
22. Anderson KJ, Henneberg M, Norris RM. Anatomy of nasal profile. J Anat.213(2), 210-216, 2008
23. Berkeley W. The cleft – lip nose. Plast Reconstr Surg; 23:567–575,1959.
24. Eric Liou, Subramaniam M, Chen Phil, Singh C. The progressive changes of nasal symmetry and growth after nasoalveolar molding – a three year follow – up study. Palstic & reconstr surg, 114(4),858-864, 2004.
25. Boo-Chai K. Primary repair of unilateral cleft lip nose in the Oriental: a 20 years follow up. Plast Reconstr Surg; 80:185-194,1985.
26. Salyer K. Primary correction of unilateral cleft lip nose: a 15 years expe-rience. Plast Reconstr Surg; 77:558–566, 1985.
27. Pai Betty, Ellen Wen, Huang CS,Eric Liou. Symmetry of the nose after presurgical nasoalveolar molding in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate: A preliminary study. Cleft apaltecraniofac J 42(6),658-663, 2005.
28. Sayler, Edward R, David G. Unilateral cleft lip – nose repair: A 33 years experience. J of Craniofac Surg, 14(4),549-558, 2003.
29. Maull DJ, Grayson BH, Cutting CB, Bretch LE, Bookstein FL, Khorram-badi D, Webb JA, Hurwitz DJ. Long term effects of naso alveolar molding on three – dimensional shape in unilateral clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 36: 391–397, 1999.
30. Ian T. Jackson, Michael C. Fasching. Secondary deformity in cleft lip, nose and cleft palate. In McCarthy. Plastic Surgery, Cleft lip and palate and Craniofacial Anomalies, Volume 4. W. B. Saunders Company, United States of America. Chapter 56; 2878-2902, 1990.
31. Farida Kamil Sulaiman, Inge Gustiningsih Haryanto, Syafrudin Hak, Norifumi Nakamura, Masaaki Sasaguri, Masamichi Ohishi. Fifteen-Year Follow-Up Results of Presurgical Orthopedics Followed by Primary Correction for Unilateral Cleft Lip Nose in Program SEHATI in Indo-nesia. The Cleft Palate-Craniofac J; 50:129–137, 2013.
32. Aslihan Uzel, Nazan Alparslan. Long termeffects of presurgical infant orthopedics in patients with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review. Cleft palate Craniofac J; 48:587-595,2011.
33. Sujoy Banerjee, Rajlakshmi Banerjee, Usha Radke, Darshana Mundhe. Presurgical management of unilateral cleft lip and palate : a clinical report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc , 11(1), 71-76, 2011.
Abstracted / indexed in
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Submission Turnaround Time
Conferences
Top