Fluoride Varnish Application in the Primary Care Setting. A Clinical Study

The study objectives were twofold: 1. To examine how an intervention to apply fluoride varnish (FV) in a primary health setting to all young, low-income children was implemented and sustained and 2. To assess the feasibility of tracking medical care utilization in this population. Study Design: The study included children age 1-5, insured through a government program, seen (7/1/2010- 4/30/ 2012). Data on age, race, sex, clinic encounter, eligibility for and receipt of FV was obtained. The level of data in primary care, specialty care, urgent care and hospitalizations to assess feasibility of future patient tracking was also acquired.. Results: Of 12,067 children, 85% received FV. Differences were found by age (youngest had highest rates). Small differences by race (81%-88%, highest in Blacks.) was found. No differences were found by sex. Ability to track over time was mixed. Approximately 50% had comprehensive data. However, primary care visit and hospitalization data was available on a larger percentage. Conclusions: FV programs can be introduced in the primary care setting and sustained. Further, long-term follow up is possible. Future study of such cohorts capturing health and cost benefits of oral health prevention efforts is needed.

Fluoride varnish, caries prevention. Children. Primary care center

1. Edelstein BL. Dental care considerations for young children. Spec Care Dentist. 2002;22(3 Suppl):11S-25S.

2. Edelstein BL, Douglass CW. Dispelling the myth that 50 percent of u.S. Schoolchildren have never had a cavity. Public Health Rep. Sep-Oct 1995;110(5):522-530; discussion 521, 531-523.

3. Silk H. Making oral health a priority in your preventive pediatric visits. Clin Pediatr (Phila). Mar 2010;49(2):103-109.

4. Yost J, Li Y. Promoting oral health from birth through childhood: Prevention of early childhood caries. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. Jan-Feb 2008;33(1):17-23; quiz 24-15.

5. Edelstein BL, Chinn CH. Update on disparities in oral health and access to dental care for america’s children. Acad Pediatr. Nov-Dec 2009;9(6):415-419.

6. Wysen KH, Hennessy PM, Lieberman MI, Garland TE, Johnson SM. Kids get care: Integrating preventive dental and medical care using a public health case management model. J Dent Educ. May 2004;68(5):522-530.

7. Kaste LM, Selwitz RH, Oldakowski RJ, Brunelle JA, Winn DM, Brown LJ. Coronal caries in the primary and permanent dentition of children and adolescents 1-17 years of age: United states, 1988-1991. J Dent Res. Feb 1996;75 Spec No:631-641.

8. Newacheck PW, Hughes DC, Hung YY, Wong S, Stoddard JJ. The unmet health needs of america’s children. Pediatrics. Apr 2000;105(4 Pt 2):989-997.

9. Lewis CW, Grossman DC, Domoto PK, Deyo RA. The role of the pediatrician in the oral health of children: A national survey. Pediatrics. Dec 2000;106(6):E84.

10. Berg P, Coniglio D. Oral health in children overlooked and undertreated. JAAPA. Apr 2006;19(4):40, 42, 44 passim.

11. Mouradian WE, Berg JH, Somerman MJ. Addressing disparities through dental-medical collaborations, part 1. The role of cultural competency in health disparities: Training of primary care medical practitioners in children’s oral health. J Dent Educ. Aug 2003;67(8):860-868.

12. Pourat N, Nicholson G. Unaffordable dental care is linked to frequent school absences. Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res. Nov 2009(PB2009-10):1-6.

13. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Infant oral health care policy statement. J Pediatric Dentistry Special Issue Reference Manual. 1999-00;21(5).

14. The Nation’s Health - The Official Newspaper of the American Public Health Association. The Nation’s Health - The Official Newspaper of the American Public Health Association,1999.