Article Data

  • Views 844
  • Dowloads 131

Original Research

Open Access

Salivary Lysozyme in Relation to Dental Caries among Thai Preschoolers

  • Lertsirivorakul J1,*,
  • Petsongkram B2
  • Chaiyarit P1
  • Klaynongsruang S1
  • Pitiphat W1

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand

2Dental Department, Sikhiu Hospital, Sikhiu, Nakornratchasima.

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.4.343 Vol.39,Issue 4,July 2015 pp.343-347

Published: 01 July 2015

*Corresponding Author(s): Lertsirivorakul J E-mail: jinda_le@kku.ac.th

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze salivary lysozyme levels and activities in Thai preschoolers with different dental caries status. Study design: Unstimulated saliva samples were collected from 64 preschoolers, divided into a caries free group (n = 32) and a severe early childhood caries (S-ECC) group (n = 32). Results: Both groups were similar regarding gender, age, dental caries status, salivary flow rate, and salivary protein concentrations. No differences were also in the caregivers´ characteristics, oral health behaviors, and feeding habits. Only professional fluoride application was less frequently found in the S-ECC group (p < 0.03). Western blotting and lysoplate assays revealed that salivary lysozyme levels and activities were significantly increased in the S-ECC group compared with the caries free group (p< 0.001; p = 0.008, respectively). Conclusion: The up-regulated expression of salivary lysozyme and the increased lysozyme activity in S-ECC preschoolers suggests a possible connection between salivary lysozyme and oral immunity in response to early childhood dental caries.

Keywords

Dental caries, Lysozyme, Saliva, Preschoolers

Cite and Share

Lertsirivorakul J,Petsongkram B,Chaiyarit P, Klaynongsruang S,Pitiphat W. Salivary Lysozyme in Relation to Dental Caries among Thai Preschoolers. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2015. 39(4);343-347.

References

1. Dental Health Division, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. The 7th National Oral Health Survey Report 2012. In: Bureau of Dental Health. Retrieved October 20, 2013, from: http://dental.anamai.moph.go.th/survey7.pdf

2. Clarkson BH. Introduction to cariology. Dent Clin North Am 43: 569-78, 1999.

3. Rudney JD. Does variability in salivary protein concentrations influence oral microbial ecology and oral health? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 6: 343-67, 1995.

4. Merolla M, Fromer M. Lysozyme. In: MBP Molecular Biology Project. Retrieved November 11, 2012, from: http:// maptest.rutgers.edu/ drupal/?q=node/51

5. Laible NJ, Germaine GR. Bactericidal activity of human lysozyme, muramidase-inactive lysozyme, and cationic polypeptides against Streptococcus sanguis and Streptococcus faecalis: inhibition by chitin oligosaccharides. Infect Immun 48:720-28, 1985.

6. Pollock II, Iacono VI, Goodman Bicker H, MacKay BJ, Katona LI, Taichman LB, et al. (1976). The binding, aggregation and lytic properties of lysozyme. In: Proceedings: Microbial aspects of dental caries (Spec Suppl, Microbiology Abstracts). Stiles HM, Loesche WJ, O’Brien TC, editors. Washington, DC: Information Retrieval Inc., pp. 325-52.

7. Roger V, Tenovuo J, Lenander-Lumikari M, Söderling E, Vilja P. Lysozyme and Lactoperoxidase inhibit the adherence of Streptococcus mutans NCTC 10449 (serotype c) to saliva-treated hydroxyapatite in vitro. Caries Res 28: 421-28, 1994.

8. Twetman S, Lindqvest L, Sund M-L. Effect of human lysozyme on 2-deoxyglucose uptake by Streptococcus mutans and other oral micro-organisms. J Dent Res 20: 223-29, 1986.

9. Twetman S, Lindner A and Modeer T. Lysozyme and salivary immunoglobulin A in caries-free and caries-susceptible preschool children. Swed Dent J 5: 9-14, 1981.

10. Hao GF, Lin HC. Relationship of concentration of lactoferrin and lysozyme in saliva and dental caries in primary dentition. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 44: 82-4, 2009.

11. Stuchell RN, Mandel ID. A comparative study of salivary lysozyme in caries-resistant and caries-susceptible adults. J Dent Res 62: 552-54, 1983.

12. Grahn E, Tenovuo J, Lehtonen OP, Eerola E, Vilja P. Antimicrobial systems of human whole saliva in relation to dental caries, cariogenic bacteria, and gingival inflammation in young adults. Acta Odontol Scand 46: 67-74, 1988.

13. Kirstila V, Hakkinen P, Jentsch H, Vilja P, Tenovuo J. Longitudinal analysis of the association of human salivary antimicrobial agents with caries increment and cariogenic micro-organisms: a two-year cohort study. J Dent Res 77: 73-80, 1998.

14. Jentsch H, Beetke E, Gocke R. Salivary analyses and caries increment over 4 years: an approach by cluster analysis. Clin Oral Investig 8: 156-60, 2004.

15. Felizardo KR, Gonçalves RB, Scharcz WD, Poli-Federico RC, Maciel SM, de Andrade FB. An evaluation of the expression profiles of salivary proteins lactoferrin and lysozyme and their association with caries experience and activity. Rev odonto ciênc 25: 344-49, 2010.

16. Lenth RV(2006-2009). Java Applets for Power and Sample Size [Computer software]. Retrieved from: http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~rlenth/Power

17. World Health Organization. Basic Methods. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997.

18. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193: 265-275, 1951.

19. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680-85, 1970.

20. Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76: 4350-354, 1979.

21. Osserman EF and Lawlor DP. Serum and urinary lysozyme (muramidase) in monocytic and monomyelocytic leukemia. J Exp Med 124: 921-52, 1966.

22. Tenovuo J, Lehtonen OP, Aaltonen AS, Vilja P, Tuohimaa P. Antimicrobial factors in whole saliva of human infants. Infect Immun 51: 49-53, 1986.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top