Subcutaneous Midazolam with and without Ketamine for Sedation In Children Undergoing Dental Treatment: A Pilot Study

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) sedation using midazolam with and without ketamine in non-cooperative pediatric patients undergoing dental treatment. Study Design: A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, crossover pilot clinical trial was carried out in 13 children, aged between 17-46 months, ASA l, Frankl 1. Two sedation schemes were administered SC: Midazolam alone (M), and a combination of Midazolam-Ketamine (MK). Both regimens were administered to the same patient in two consecutive treatment sessions, in accordance with a random assignment. Overall behavior, movement, and crying were assessed according to the modified Houpt scale. Heart rate, blood pressure, blood oxygen saturation, and possible side effects were also monitored. Results: The percentage of non-crying children was always higher in the treatment with MK compared with the treatment with M, but without a significant statistical difference. Regarding variable body movement, the percentage of children without movement was higher in the MK group, although only up to minute 10; no significant differences were found at 20, 30, and 40 minutes, and from minute 40, body movement was lower in the M group. Conclusions: Midazolam alone and the midazolam-ketamine combination administered subcutaneously resulted in a safe and efficient pharmacological method for providing moderate sedation to non-cooperative pediatric patients undergoing dental treatment.

subcutaneous; sedation; midazolam; ketamine; dental.

1. AAPD Guideline on behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient. Ref Manual; 34: 175–187, 2011.

2. Özer L, Öktem ZB, Küçükyavuz Z. Effects of deep sedation on behaviors and side effects in children undergoing different dental procedures. Pediatr Dent; 33: 158–164, 2011.

3. Coté CJ, Wilson S. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: an update. Pediatrics; 118: 2587–2601, 2006.

4. Bahetwar SK, Pandey RK, Saksena AK, Chandra G. A comparative evaluation of intranasal midazolam, ketamine and their combination for sedation of young uncooperative pediatric dental patients: a triple blind randomized crossover trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 35: 415–420, 2012.

5. AAPD Guideline on use of anesthesia personnel in the Administration of Office-based deep sedation/general anesthesia to the pediatric dental patient. Ref Manual; 35: 222–225, 2012.

6. Shapira J, Kupietzky A, Kadari A, Fuks AB, Holan G. Comparison of oral midazolam with and without hydroxyzine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent; 26: 492–496, 2004.

7. Funk W, Jakob W, Riedl T, Taeger K. Oral preanaesthetic medication for children: double-blind randomized study of a combination of midazolam and ketamine vs midazolam or ketamine alone. Br J Anaesth; 84: 335–340, 2000.

8. Ghai B, Grandhe RP, Kumar A, Chari P. Comparative evaluation of midazolam and ketamine with midazolam alone as oral premedication. Pediatr Anesth;15: 554–559, 2005.

9. Somri M, Parisinos CA, Kharouba J, et al. Optimizing the dose of oral midazolam sedation for dental procedures in children: a prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Int J Paediatr Dent; 22: 271–279, 2012.

10. Sheta SA, AlSarheed M. Oral midazolam premedication for children undergoing general anaesthesia for dental care. (Abstract). Int J Pediatr Dent; 2009: 274380, 2009.

11. Mistry RB, Nahata MC. Ketamine for conscious sedation in pediatric emergency care. Pharmacotherapy; 25: 1104–1111, 2005.

12. Melendez E, Bachur R. Serious adverse events during procedural sedation with ketamine. Pediatr Emer Care; 25: 325–328, 2009.

13. Roelofse JA. The evolution of ketamine applications in children. Pediatr Anesth; 20: 240–245, 2009.

14. Tobias JD. Subcutaneous administration of fentanyl and midazolam to prevent withdrawal after prolonged sedation in children. Crit Care Med; 27: 2262–2265, 1999.

15. Dallman JA, Ignelzi MA Jr, Briskie DM. Comparing the safety, efficacy and recovery of intranasal midazolam vs. oral chloral hydrate and promethazine. Pediatr Dent; 23: 424–430, 2001.

16. Torres J, Tapia I, Rosales MA, Hernández JF, Pozos AJ. Comparison of three conscious sedation regimens for pediatric dental patients. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 31: 183–186, 2007.

17. Shah A, Mosdossy G, McLeod S, et al. A comparison study between ketamine and ketamine-promethazine combination for oral sedation in pediatric dental patients. Ann Emerg Med; 57: 425–433, 2011.

18. Bui T, Redden RJ, Murphy S. A comparison study between ketamine and ketamine-promethazine combination for oral sedation in pediatric dental patients. Anesth Prog; 49: 14–18, 2002.

19. Ozdemir D, Kayserili E, Arslanoglu S, Gulez P, Vergin C. Ketamine and midazolam for invasive procedures in children with malignancy: a comparison of routes of intravenous, oral, and rectal administration. J Trop Pediatr; 50: 224–228, 2004.

20. Roelofse JA, Roelofse PG. Oxygen desaturation in a child receiving a combination of Ketamine and Midazolam for dental extractions. Anesth Prog; 44: 68–70, 1997.

21. Abrams R, Morrison JE, Villaseñor A, Hencmann D, Da Fonseca M, Mueller W. Safety and effectiveness of intranasal administration of sedative medications (ketamine, midazolam, or sufentanil) for urgent brief pediatric dental procedures. Anesth Prog; 40: 63–66, 1993.

22. Bennett J, Nichols F, Rosenblum M, Condry J. Subcutaneous administration of midazolam: a comparison of the Bioject Jet injector with the conventional syringe and needle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 56: 1249–1254, 1998.

23. Roelofse JA, Louw LR, Roelofse PG. Double blind randomized comparison of oral trimeprazine-methadone and ketamine-midazolam for sedation of pediatric dental patients for oral surgical procedures. Anesth Prog; 45: 3–11, 1998.

24. Roelofse J, Shipton EA, de la Harpe, Blignaut RJ. Intranasal Sufentanil/ Midazolam versus Ketamine/Midazolam for analgesia/sedation in the pediatric population prior to undergoing multiple dental extractions under general anesthesia: a prospective, double-blind, randomized comparison. Anesth Prog; 51: 114–121, 2004.

25. Laurenço-Matharu L, Ashley PF, Furness S. Sedation of children undergoing dental treatment. Cochrane Oral Health Group; 4: CD003867, 2008.

26. Roelofse JA, Joubert JJ, Roelofse PG. A double-blind randomized comparison of midazolam alone and midazolam combined with ketamine for sedation of pediatric dental patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 54: 838–844, 1996.

27. Cagiran E, Eyigor C, Sipahi A, Koca H, Balciouglu T, Uyar M. Comparison of oral midazolam and midazolam-ketamine as sedative agents in paediatric dentistry. Eur J Paediatr Dent; 11: 19–22, 2010.

28. Moreira TA, Costa PS, Costa LR, et al. Combined oral midazolam– ketamine better than midazolam alone for sedation of young children: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Paediatr Dent; 23: 207–215, 2013.