How Do Patients and Parents Decide for Orthodontic Treatment– Effects of Malocclusion, Personal Expectations, Education and Media

To examine patients’ and parents’ perceptions and expectations from orthodontic treatment. Study Design: 491 patients (274 female, 217 male) aged 14-22 years, and 399 parents (245 female, 154 male) completed a questionnaire about preferences, needs and expectations about orthodontic treatment, and scored the present problem. Continuous variables were compared by Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests, whereas Chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Results: Patients’(77.1%) and parents’(84.6%), decision about orthodontic treatments were influenced by suggestion of dentists. Patients who decided to attend to clinic by themselves were higher than parents (p=0.006). Dental aesthetics was the determinant factor for treatment demand for patients(61.0%) and parents(57.3%). Improvement in oral functions was more important for Class III patients than Class I patients (p=0.040). Adult patients/parents with higher education gave more importance to oral functions as well as dental aesthetics (p=0.031). There was no difference among Angle classifications regarding orthodontic problem scores. Parents found media sources valuable (p=0.018) but majority expected dentists for information about orthodontic treatments. Education degree of adult patients/parents effected this decision(p=0.002). Conclusions: Desire to have better dental aesthetics was the primary motivating factor for all participants. Clinicians should consider concerns of Class III patients about oral functions during treatment planning.

malocclusion, questionnaire, orthodontic treatment need, expectation, perception

1. Nattrass C, Sandy JR. Adult orthodontics--a review. Br J Orthod;22:331-7. 1995.

2. Zachrisson BU. Global trends and paradigm shifts in clinical orthodontics. World J Orthod ;6:3-7. 2005.

3. Pabari S, Moles DR, Cunningham SJ. Assessment of motivation and psychological characteristics of adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;140:e263-72. 2011.

4. Birkeland K, Katle A, Lovgreen S, Boe OE, Wisth PJ. Factors influencing the decision about orthodontic treatment. A longitudinal study among 11- and 15-year-olds and their parents. J Orofac Orthop;60:292-307. 1999.

5. Birkeland K, Boe OE, Wisth PJ. Relationship between occlusion and satisfaction with dental appearance in orthodontically treated and untreated groups. A longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod;22:509-18. 2000.

6. Bos A, Hoogstraten J, Prahl-Andersen B. Expectations of treatment and satisfaction with dentofacial appearance in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;123:127-32. 2003.

7. de Oliveira CM, Sheiham A. Orthodontic treatment and its impact on oral health-related quality of life in Brazilian adolescents. J Orthod;31:20-7; discussion 15. 2004.

8. Marques LS, Ramos-Jorge ML, Paiva SM, Pordeus IA. Malocclusion: esthetic impact and quality of life among Brazilian schoolchildren. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;129:424-7. 2006.

9. Proffit WR. Surgical-orthodontic treatment. St Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1990.

10. Tung AW, Kiyak HA. Psychological influences on the timing of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;113:29-39. 1998.

11. Bennett ME, Michaels C, O’Brien K, et al. Measuring beliefs about orthodontic treatment: a questionnaire approach. J Public Health Dent;57:215- 23. 1997.

12. Phillips C, Broder HL, Bennett ME. Dentofacial disharmony: motivations for seeking treatment. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg;12:7-15. 1997.

13. Helm S, Kreiborg S, Solow B. Psychosocial implications of malocclusion: a 15-year follow-up study in 30-year-old Danes. Am J Orthod;87:110-8. 1985.

14. Kilpelainen PV, Phillips C, Tulloch JF. Anterior tooth position and motivation for early treatment. Angle Orthod;63:171-4. 1993.

15. Soh G, Lew KK. Assessment of orthodontic treatment needs by teenagers in an Asian community in Singapore. Community Dent Health;9:57-62. 1992.

16. Edgerton MT, Jr., Knorr NJ. Motivational patterns of patients seeking cosmetic (esthetic) surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg;48:551-7. 1971.

17. McKiernan EX, McKiernan F, Jones ML. Psychological profiles and motives of adults seeking orthodontic treatment. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1992;7:187-98.

18. Kokich VO, Jr., Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent;11:311-24. 1999.

19. Bergstrom K, Halling A, Wilde B. Orthodontic care from the patients’ perspective: perceptions of 27-year-olds. Eur J Orthod;20:319-29. 1998.

20. Christopherson EA, Briskie D, Inglehart MR. Preadolescent orthodontic treatment need: objective and subjective provider assessments and patient self-reports. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;135:S80-6. 2009.

21. Henzell MR, Knight AM, Morgaine KC, Antoun JS, Farella M. A qualitative analysis of orthodontic-related posts on Twitter. The Angle Orhodontist 2013 (e pub ahead printed).

22. Uslu O, Akcam MO. Evaluation of long-term satisfaction with orthodontic treatment for skeletal class III individuals. J Oral Sci;49:31-9. 2007.

23. Dann Ct, Phillips C, Broder HL, Tulloch JF. Self-concept, Class II malocclusion, and early treatment. Angle Orthod;65:411-6. 1995.

24. Birkeland K, Boe OE, Wisth PJ. Orthodontic concern among 11-year-old children and their parents compared with orthodontic treatment need assessed by index of orthodontic treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;110:197-205. 1996.

25. Oliveira PG, Tavares RR, Freitas JC. Assessment of motivation, expectations and satisfaction of adult patients submitted to orthodontic treatment. Dental Press J Orthod;18:81-7. 2013.

26. Marques LS, Pordeus IA, Ramos-Jorge ML, et al. Factors associated with the desire for orthodontic treatment among Brazilian adolescents and their parents. BMC Oral Health;9:34. 2009.

27. Al-Omiri MK, Abu Alhaija ES. Factors affecting patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod;76:422-31. 2006.

28. Vallittu PK, Vallittu AS, Lassila VP. Dental aesthetics--a survey of attitudes in different groups of patients. J Dent;24:335-8. 1996.

29. Stenvik A, Espeland L, Linge BO, Linge L. Lay attitudes to dental appearance and need for orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod;19:271-7. 1997.

30. Cook DR, Harris EF, Vaden JL. Comparison of university and private-practice orthodontic treatment outcomes with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;127:707- 12. 2005.

31. Yang-Powers LC, Sadowsky C, Rosenstein S, BeGole EA. Treatment outcome in a graduate orthodontic clinic using the American Board of Orthodontics grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;122:451-5. 2002.

32. Hosoda M, Stone-Romero EF, Coats G. The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology;56:431-62. 2003.

33. Bernabe E, Sheiham A, de Oliveira CM. Condition-specific impacts on quality of life attributed to malocclusion by adolescents with normal occlusion and Class I, II and III malocclusion. Angle Orthod;78:977-82. 2008.

34. English JD, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS. Does malocclusion affect masticatory performance? Angle Orthod;72:21-7. 2002.

35. Rustemeyer J, Eke Z, Bremerich A. Perception of improvement after orthognathic surgery: the important variables affecting patient satisfaction. Oral Maxillofac Surg;14:155-62. 2010.

36. Farronato G, Giannini L, Riva R, Galbiati G, Maspero C. Correlations between malocclusions and dyslalias. Eur J Paediatr Dent;13:13-8. 2012.

37. Guay AH, Maxwell DL, Beecher R. A radiographic study of tongue posture at rest and during the phonation of /s/ in class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod;48:10-22. 1978.

38. Jorgensen G. Social media basics for orthodontists. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;141:510-5. 2012.

39. Knosel M, Jung K. Informational value and bias of videos related to orthodontics screened on a video-sharing Web site. Angle Orthod;81:532-9. 2011.

40. Edwards DT, Shroff B, Lindauer SJ, Fowler CE, Tufekci E. Media advertising effects on consumer perception of orthodontic treatment quality. Angle Orthod;78:771-7. 2008.