Efficiency and Reliability of Thermal and Electrical Tests to Evaluate Pulp Status in Primary Teeth with Assessment of Anxiety Levels in Children

Assessing the pulp status plays a vital role in diagnosis and treatment planning in dentistry especially in children, who may not be able to verbalize their dental symptoms. Pulp sensibility test is used as a valuable investigation to evaluate the state of pulp. The aim of this study is to assess the efficiency and reliability of thermal and electrical pulp tests in primary teeth and to rule out the anxiety level involved in each tests. Study design: 30 children aged between 6 to 8 years with carious primary molar teeth in need of conservative pulp therapy were included in this study. 3 tests at random were employed on each tooth which includes cold, heat, electrical pulp test. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were evaluated based on the clinical visual examination on access opening and the accuracy for each test was calculated. The Facial Image Scale (FIS) was used to assess the state of dental anxiety in children due to these pulp sensibility tests. Results: The highest accuracy rate was calculated for EPT (0.814) followed by cold test (0.777) and heat test (0.759). Conclusion: No significant association was found between the accuracy of all the three tests. (P value > 0.05). Cold test is the most reliable test due to its simplicity and ease to perform. (FIS -1.53).

pulp sensibility tests, Facial image scale.

1. Berman LH, Hartwell GR. Diagnosis. In: Cohen S, Hargreaves KM, eds. Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. St Louis: Mosby-Elsevier; 2006:2–39.

2. Chen E, Abbott PV. Dental pulp testing: a review. Inter J Dent 2009. Article ID 365785: 1–12. Epub November 2009.

3. Chambers IG. The role and methods of pulp testing in oral diagnosis: a review. IEJ 15: 1-5, 1982.

4. Dahl E, Mjör IA. The structure and distribution of nerves in the pulp– dentin organ. Acta Odontol Scand 31: 349–356, 1973.

5. Gunji T. Morphological research on the sensitivity of dentin. Arch Histol Jpn 45: 45–67, 1982.

6. Byers MR, Narhi MO. Nerve supply of the pulpodentin complex and responses to injury. In: Hargreaves KM, Goodis HE (eds). Seltzer and Bender’s Dental Pulp. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing 155–157, 2002.

7. Byers MR. Dental sensory receptors. Int Rev Neurobiol 25: 39–94, 1984.

8. Markowitz K, Kim S. Hypersensitive teeth. Experimental studies of dentinal desensitizing agents. Dent Clin North Am 34: 491–501, 1990.

9. Brännström M. The hydrodynamic theory of dentinal pain: sensation in preparations, caries and dentinal crack syndrome. J Endod 12: 453–457, 1986.

10. Trowbridge HO, Franks M, Korostoff E, Emling R. Sensory response to thermal stimulation in human teeth. J Endod 6: 405–412, 1980.

11. Pantera EA, Anderson RW, Pantera CT. Reliability of electric pulp testing after pulpal testing with dichlorodi- fluoromethane. J Endod 19: 312–314, 1993.

12. Gatchel RJ. Managing anxiety and pain during dental treatment; J Am Dent Assoc 123(6): 37-41. 1992.

13. Aartman IH, van Everdingen T, Hoogstraten J, Schuurs AH. Self report measurements of dental anxiety and fear in children: a critical assessment. ASDC J Dent Child 65(4):252-8, 229-30, 1998.

14. Eli I. Dental anxiety: A cause for possible misdiagnosis of tooth vitality. Int Endod J 26: 251-53, 1993.

15. Buchanan H, Niven N.: Validation of a Facial Image Scale to assess child dental anxiety, Int J Paediatr Dent 12: 47-52, 2002.

16. Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Review of pulp sensibility tests. Part I: general information and thermal tests. Int Endod J 43: 738–762, 2010.

17. Bender IB, Landau MA, Fonsecca S, Trowbridge HO. The optimum placement-site of the electrode in electric pulp testing of the 12 anterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 118: 305–310,1989.

18. Hyman JJ, Cohen ME, Lakes G. The predictive value of endodontic diagnostic tests. Oral Surg 58: 343–346, 1984.

19. Asfour MA, Millar BJ, Smith PB. An assessment of the reliability of pulp testing in deciduous teeth. Int J Paediat Dent 6: 163–166, 1996.

20. Petersson K, Soderstrom C, Kiani Anaraki M, Levy G. Evaluation of the ability of thermal and electrical tests to register pulp vitality. Endod Dent Traumatol 15: 127–131, 1999.

21. Weisleder R, Yamauchi S, Caplan DJ, Trope M, Teixeira FB. The vitality of pulp testing: a clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 140: 1013–1017, 2009.

22. Hori A, Poureslami HR, Parirokh M, Mirzazadeh A, Abbott P. The ability of pulp sensibility tests to evaluate the pulp status in primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 21(6): 441-5, 2011.

23. Fulling HJ, Andreasen JO. Influence of maturation status and tooth type of permanent teeth upon electrometric and thermal pulp testing procedures. Scand J Dent Res 84: 291–296, 1976.

24. Fearnhead RW. The histologic demonstration of nerve fibers in dentin. In: Andersen DJ, ed. Sensory Mechanisms in Dentine. New York: Pergamon Press 15, 1963.

25. Burnside RR, Sorenson FM, Buck DL. Electric vitality testing in orthodontic patients. Angel Orthod 44: 213-7, 1974.

26. McGrath PA, Gillespie J. Pain assessment in children and adolescents. In: Turk DC, Melzack R, eds. Handbook of Pain Assessment. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2001:97–118.

27. McMurtry CM, Noel M, Chambers CT, McGrath PJ. Children’s fear during procedural pain: Preliminary investigation of the Children’s Fear Scale. Health Psychology. 30(6): 780-788, 2011.