Article Data

  • Views 782
  • Dowloads 205

Original Research

Open Access

A CAMBRA Model For High Caries Risk Indian Children: A Pragmatic Comprehensive Tailored Intervention

  • Krishan Gauba1,*,
  • Ashima Goyal1
  • Neeti Mittal1

1The Unit of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Oral Health Sciences Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.1.36 Vol.40,Issue 1,January 2016 pp.36-43

Published: 01 January 2016

*Corresponding Author(s): Krishan Gauba E-mail: k_gauba@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate a CAMBRA based therapeutic and preventive model for high caries risk children in a pediatric dentistry clinic set-up. Study design: A total of 100 systemically healthy children aged 4–8 years with dmft/DMFT ≥5 and/or ≤20% magnitude of cariogram sector ‘chance to avoid new cavities’ were enrolled. The program comprised of following components i.e. caries risk assessment, customized preventive interventions (Motivational interviewing and counseling, oral prophylaxis, fluoride varnish, fissure sealants) and restorative procedures. The recall intervals were scheduled on the basis of caries risk i.e. every 1 month (≤40% chance to avoid new cavities) and 3 months (≥41% chance to avoid new cavities). The primary outcome measure was ‘new carious lesions' at 12 months following achievement of ‘termination levels' i.e. ≥41% magnitude of ‘chance to avoid new cavities.' The secondary outcome measures were changes in cariogram parameters at termination and duration needed to achieve termination levels. Results: The program showed 97% success rate as 3/100 subjects developed new carious lesions at 12 months follow up. Highly significant (p<0.001) favorable shift was achieved in cariogram parameters at termination. Termination levels were achieved in 2.71±4.854 months. Conclusions: The present CAMBRA based program with customized intervention and recall schedules showed favorable results.

Keywords

CAMBRA, Caries prevention, Cariogram, High caries risk.

Cite and Share

Krishan Gauba,Ashima Goyal,Neeti Mittal. A CAMBRA Model For High Caries Risk Indian Children: A Pragmatic Comprehensive Tailored Intervention. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2016. 40(1);36-43.

References

1. Dye BA, Tan S, Smith V, Lewis BG, Barker LK, Thornton-Evans G, et al. Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 11: 248, 2007.

2. Goyal A, Gauba K, Chawla HS, Kaur M, Kapur A. Epidemiology of dental caries in Chandigarh school children and trends over the last 25 years. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 25:115-118, 2007.

3. Joshi N, Sujan SG, Joshi K, Parekh H, Dave B. Prevalence, Severity and Related Factors of Dental Caries in School Going Children of Vadodara City – An Epidemiological Study. J Int Oral Health 5: 40-48, 2013.

4. Saravanan S, Kalyani V, Vijayarani MP, Felix JWA, Arunmozhi P, Krishnan V, Sampath Kumar P. Caries prevalence and treatment needs of rural school children in Chidambaram Taluk, Tamil Nadu, South India. Indian J Dent Res 19: 186-90, 2008.

5. Ismail AI, Lim S, Sohn W, Willem JM. Determinants of early childhood caries in low-income African-American young children. Pediatr Dent 30:289–296, 2008.

6. Jigjid B, Ueno M, Shinada K, Kawaguchi Y. Early childhood caries and related risk factors in Mongolian children. Community Dent Health 26:121–128, 2009.

7. Bhatia SK, Maguire SA, Chadwick BL, Hunter ML, Harris JC, Tempest V, Mann MK, Kemp AM. Characteristics of child dental neglect: A systematic review. J Dent Oct 17. pii: S0300-5712(13)00274-1, 2013.

8. Ayhan H, Suskan E, Yildirim S. The effect of nursing or rampant caries on height, body weight and head circumference. J Clin Pediatr Dent 20:209–12, 1996.

9. Krisdapong S, Prasertsom P, Rattanarangsima K, Sheiham A. School absence due to toothache associated with sociodemographic factors, dental caries status, and oral health-related quality of life in 12- and 15-year-old Thai children. J Public Health Dent 73: 321-8, 2013.

10. Skeie MS, Raadal M, Strand GV, Espelid I. The relationship between caries in the primary dentition at 5 years of age and permanent dentition at 10 years of age - a longitudinal study. Int J Paediatr Dent 16:152-60, 2006.

11. Hirsch GB, Edelstein BL, Frosh M, Anselmo T. A simulation model for designing effective interventions in early childhood caries. Prev Chronic Dis 9: 110219, 2012.

12. Fisher-Owens S, Gansky S, Platt L, Weintraub J, Soobader M-J, Bram-lett M, Newacheck P. Influences on children’s oral health: A conceptual model. Pediatrics 120: e510–e520, 2007.

13. Twetman S. Prevention of early childhood caries (ECC)–review of litera-ture published 1998– 2007. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 9:12–18, 2008.

14. Yevlahova D, Satur J. Models for individual oral health promotion and their effectiveness: a systematic review. Aust Dent J 54:190–197, 2009.

15. Ertuğrul F, Eltem R, Eronat C. A comparative study of plaque mutans strep-tococci levels in children receiving glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Dent Child 70:10-4, 2003.

16. Young DA, Featherstone JD, Roth JR, Anderson M, Autio-Gold J, Chris-tensen GJ, Fontana M, Kutsch VK, Peters MC, Simonsen RJ, Wolff MS. Caries management by risk assessment: implementation guidelines. J Calif Dent Assoc 35: 799–805, 2007.

17. Ramos-Gomez F, Ng MW. Into the Future: Keeping Healthy Teeth Caries Free: Pediatric CAMBRA Protocols. J Calif Dent Assoc 39: 723–733, 2011.

18. Featherstone JDB, White JM, Hoover CI, Rapozo-Hilo M, Weintraub JA, Wilson RS, Zhan L, Gansky SA. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Anti-caries Therapies Targeted according to Risk Assessment (Caries Manage-ment by Risk Assessment). Caries Res 46:118–129, 2012.

19. Bratthall D, Hänsel Petersson G. Cariogram – a multifactorial risk assess-ment model for a multifactorial disease. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 33:256–64, 2005.

20. Census of India 2011. http://censusindia.gov.in/PopulationFinder.

21. Möller IJ, Poulsen S. A standardized system for diagnosing, recording and analysing caries data. Scand J Dent Res 81: 1-11, 1973.

22. Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Intl Dent J 25; 4: 229-235.

23. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement forcate-gorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–74, 1977.

24. Alban A. An improved Snyder test. J Dent Res 49:641, 1970.

25. Bratthall D, Hänsel Petersson G, Stjernswärd JR. The cariogram manual. Cariogram, Internet Version 2.01. April 2, 2004. (http://www.mah.se/fakulteter-och omraden/Odontologiska fakulteten/Avdelning-och-kansli/Cariologi/Cariogram/.)

26. Kay E, Locker D. Is dental health education effective? A systematic review of current evidence. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 24: 231–235, 1996.

27. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing; Preparing people for change, 2nd edn. London: Guilford Press, 2002.

28. Prochaska JO, Di Clemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviours. Am Psychol 47: 1102–1114, 1992.

29. Amalia R, Schaub RMH, Widyanti N, Stewart R, Groothoff JW. The role of school-based dental programme on dental caries experience in Yogya-karta Province, Indonesia. Int J Paed Dent 22: 203–210, 2012.

30. Hänsel Petersson G, Twetman S, Bratthall D. Evaluation of a computer program for caries risk assessment in schoolchildren. Caries Res 36: 327- 340, 2002.

31. Hänsel Petersson G, Fure S, Bratthall D. Evaluation of a computer-based caries risk assessment program in an elderly group of individuals. Acta Odontol Scand 61:165-170, 2003.

32. Holgerson PL, Twetman S, Stecksèn-Blicks C. Validation of an age-mod-ified caries risk assessment program (Cariogram) in preschool children. Acta Odontol Scand 67: 106-112, 2009.

33. Gao XL, Hsu CY, Xu Y, Hwarng HB, Loh T, Koh DJ. Building caries risk assessment models for children. J Dent Res 89:637-643, 2010.

34. Sullivan A. Correlation between caries incidence and secretion rate/buffer capacity of stimulated whole saliva in 5-7-year-old children matched for lactobacillus count and gingival state. Swed Dent J 14: 131-135, 1990

35. Mejàre I, Axelsson S, Dahlén G, Espelid I, Norlund A, Tranæus S, Twetman S. Caries risk assessment. A systematic review. Acta Odontologica Scan-dinavica Early Online, 1–11. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2013.822548, 2013.

36. James P, Parnell C, Whelton H. The Caries-Preventive Effect of Chlor-hexidine Varnish in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Caries Res 44:333–340, 2010

37. Bretz AW, Rosa OPS. Emerging technologies for the prevention of dental caries. Are current methods of prevention sufficient for the high risk patient? Int Dent J 61(Suppl 1): 29–33, 2011

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top