Article Data

  • Views 2378
  • Dowloads 304

Case Reports

Open Access

CAD/CAM Endocrown Fabrication from a Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Block for Primary Molar: A Case Report

  • Mehmet Selim Bilgin1,*,
  • Ali Erdem1
  • Mehmet Tanrıver1

1From Sifa University, Izmir, Turkey.

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.4.264 Vol.40,Issue 4,July 2016 pp.264-268

Published: 01 July 2016

*Corresponding Author(s): Mehmet Selim Bilgin E-mail: selim.bilgin@sifa.edu.tr

Abstract

The aim of this case report is to describe the treatment of a primary molar with a deep carious lesion by pulpotomy and placement of a ceramic endocrown. Clinical case: A 7-year-old male patient with profound caries in tooth number 85 was referred to our clinic and underwent a pulpotomy. As the final treatment in tooth restoration, placement of an endocrown was planned, because little more than half of the tooth structure remained. After an additional request from the patient’s parents for an advanced and prompt restoration, a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) block was chosen. A three-dimensional model of the arch was obtained after scanning the dental cast, and the endocrown was designed digitally according to the model. When the design was complete, the endocrown was fabricated with a milling machine. Finally, the endocrown was cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. Results: Over the 9-month follow-up period, no pulpal or periradicular pathology was observed on radiographs. Regarding the crown, the marginal fit was excellent, the anatomical form was protected, and no discoloration occurred. Conclusion: During follow-up, the CAD/CAM PICN block endocrown proved to be a good material for the short- to long-term treatment of a primary tooth. However, more clinical cases and follow-up are required to investigate the long-term effects of antagonistic tooth wear.

Keywords

Digital dentistry, Restorations, Crown, Digital design

Cite and Share

Mehmet Selim Bilgin,Ali Erdem,Mehmet Tanrıver. CAD/CAM Endocrown Fabrication from a Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Block for Primary Molar: A Case Report. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2016. 40(4);264-268.

References

1. Baelum V, Luan WM, Chen X, Fejerskov O. Predictors of tooth loss over 10 years in adult and elderly Chinese. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol;25:204–10. 1997.

2. Haugejorden O, Klock KS, Trovik TA. Incidence and predictors of self-reported tooth loss in a representative sample of Norwegian adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol;31:261–8. 2003.

3. Susin C, Oppermann RV, Haugejorden O, Albandar JM. Tooth loss and associated risk indicators in an adult urban population from south Brazil. Acta Odontol Scand;63:85–93. 2005.

4. Susin C, Haas AN, Opermann RV, Albandar JM. Tooth loss in a young population from south Brazil. J Public Health Dent;66:110–5. 2006.

5. N’gom PI, Woda A. Influence of impaired mastication on nutrition. J Prosthet Dent;87:667–73. 2002.

6. Petersen PE. The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century--the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol;31 Suppl 1:3–23. 2003.

7. Ellis RK, Donly KJ, Wild TW. Indirect composite resin crowns as an esthetic approach to treating ectodermal dysplasia: a case report. Quintessence Int;23:727–9. 1992.

8. Dukic W, Dukic OL, Milardovic S, Delija B. Clinical evaluation of indirect composite restorations at baseline and 36 months after placement. Oper Dent;35:156–64. 2010.

9. van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P. Marginal breakdown of 5-year-old direct composite inlays. J Dent;24:389–94. 1996.

10. Carlos RB, Nainan MT, Pradhan S, Sharma R, Benjamin S, Rose R. Restoration of endodontically treated molars using all ceramic endocrowns. Case Rep Dent;2013:210763. 2013.

11. Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars. J Esthet Restor Dent;25:383–90. 2013.

12. Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent;7:83–94. 1995.

13. Indira MD, Nandlal B. Comparative evaluation of the effect of cavity disinfectants on the fracture resistance of primary molars restored with indirect composite inlays: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent;28:258– 63. 2010.

14. Bilgin MS, Aglarci OS, Erdem A. Posttreatment diagnosis of caries under fixed restorations: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent;112:1364–9. 2014.

15. Ayyildiz S, Sahin C, Akgün OM, Basak F. Combined treatment with laser sintering and zirconium: a case report of dentinogenesis imperfecta. Case Rep Dent;2013:745959. 2013.

16. Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater;30:564–9. 2014.

17. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater;29:419–26. 2013.

18. Mehta SB, Banerji S, Millar BJ, Suarez-Feito JM. Current concepts on the management of tooth wear: part 1. Assessment, treatment planning and strategies for the prevention and the passive management of tooth wear. Br Dent J;212:17–27. 2012.

19. Hmaidouch R, Weigl P. Tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region: a systematic literature review. Int J Oral Sci;5:183–90. 2013.

20. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res;68:1752–4. 1989.

21. Zheng J, Zhou ZR. Effect of age on the friction and wear behaviors of human teeth. Tribol Int;39:266–73. 2006.

22. Mörmann WH, Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Sener B, Attin T, Mehl A. Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater;20:113–25. 2013.

23. da Cunha MR, Puppin-Rontani RM, Ferracane JL, Correr-Sobrinho L. In vitro wear evaluation of dental materials in primary teeth. Am J Dent;19:364–9. 2006.

24. He LH, Swain MV. Nanoindentation derived stress-strain properties of dental materials. Dent Mater;23:814–21. 2007.

25. Mahoney E, Holt A, Swain M, Kilpatrick N. The hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary molar teeth: an ultra-micro-indentation study. J Dent;28:589–94. 2000.

26. Rodrigues RF, Ramos CM, Francisconi PA, Borges AF. The shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin and enamel: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent;113:220–7. 2015.

27. Ercan E, Pamir T, Kaya A. Microshear bond strengths of different luting materials to enamel. Available in: Poster abstracts of the 6th biennial meeting of the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry (EFCD) held in association with the 33th national congress of the College National des Enseignants en Odontologie Conservatrice (CNEOC), France, 9–11 May 2013, Paris, France. Clin Oral Invest;17:1029–111. 2013.

28. Peampring C. Restorative management using hybrid ceramic of a patient with severe tooth erosion from swimming: a clinical report. J Adv Prosthodont;6:423–6. 2014.

29. Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health;30;14:10. 2014.

30. Christensen JG. Pediatric crowns are growing up. Clinicians Report;5:1, 3–4. 2012.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top