Article Data

  • Views 751
  • Dowloads 145

Original Research

Open Access

Efficacy and Stability of Two in-Office Bleaching Agents in Adolescents: 12 Months Follow-Up

  • Ayca Bacaksiz1,*,
  • Ozlem Tulunoglu2
  • Ibrahim Tulunoglu 3

1University of Gazi Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey

2Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Cleveland, OH, USA

3Department of Comprehensive Care, OH, USA.

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.4.269 Vol.40,Issue 4,July 2016 pp.269-273

Published: 01 July 2016

*Corresponding Author(s): Ayca Bacaksiz E-mail: otulunoglu@yahoo.com oxt29@case.edu

Abstract

Although there are several clinical studies on in office vital bleaching in adults, there are no Randomized Clinical Trials for the efficacy of this application in adolescents. The aim the study was to evaluate the efficiency of two bleaching systems on adolescents for twelve-months follow-up. Study design: Twenty-eight volunteers, aged between 13-18, randomly divided into two groups. Two commercial inoffice bleaching systems were used: G1 (n=14): Zoom2 25 % HP with UV light and G2 (n=14): Beaming White 36% HP with LED light in a single 3x15minute procedure. The color assessment was made with a spectrophometer; before and after bleaching; 48 hours; 1, 6 and 12 months later. Color enhancement and maintenance of two techniques over 12 months were compared by two ways ANOVA and Student’s t test. Sensitivity was evaluated on a scale with Wilcoxon test. Results: Both groups demonstrated similar and significant tooth color enhancement and did not reveal any statistically significant differences between them. However, a relapse of the tooth shade was observed with the low concentration agent/ultraviolet light system. No sensitivity was observed in any patients.Conclusion: Two in-office bleaching systems can be used successfully on young permanent teeth. For long-term successful results, high concentration/LED light may be more effective.

Keywords

In-office bleaching, adolescents.

Cite and Share

Ayca Bacaksiz,Ozlem Tulunoglu,Ibrahim Tulunoglu . Efficacy and Stability of Two in-Office Bleaching Agents in Adolescents: 12 Months Follow-Up. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2016. 40(4);269-273.

References

1-Bryan RA, Welbury RR. Treatment of aesthetic problems in pediatric dentistry. SADJ. 61: 160-164-5, 2006.

2-Lee SS, Zhang W, Lee DH, Li Y. Tooth whitening in children and adolescents: a literature review. Pediatr Dent 27: 362-368, 2005.

3- Donly KJ. The adolescent patient: special whitening challenges. Compend Contin Educ Dent 24: 390-396, 2003.

4- Donly KJ, Segura A, Henson T, Barker ML, Gerlach RW. Randomized controlled trial on of proffesional at-home tooth whitening in teenagers. Gen Dent 55: 669-674, 2007.

5- He LB, Shao MY, Tan K, Xu X, Li JY. The effects of light on bleaching and tooth sensitivity during in-office vital bleaching: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 40: 644-653, 2012.

6- Joiner A. The bleaching of teeth: a review of the literature. J Dent 34: 412-419, 2006.

7- Matis BA, Cochran MA, Franco M, Al-Ammar W, Eckert GJ, Stropes M. Eight in-office tooth whitening systems evaluated in vivo: a pilot study. Oper Dent 32: 322-327, 2007.

8- Tay LY, Kose C, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Assessing the effect of a desensitizing agent usedbefore in-office tooth bleaching. J Am Dent Assoc 140: 1245-1251, 2009.

9- Kossatz S, Dalanhol AP, Cunha T, Loguercio A, Reis A. Effect of light activation on tooth sensitivity after in-office bleaching. Oper Dent 36: 251-257, 2011.

10- Markovic L, Fotouhi K, Lorenz H, Jordan RA, Gaengler P, Zimmer S. Effect of bleaching agents on human enamel light reflectance. Oper Dent 35: 405-411, 2010.

11- Colorimetry Technical Report.: CIE Publication 15. Vienna, Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage, 18, 2004.

12- Donly KJ, Donly AS, Baharloo L, Rojas-Candelas E, Garcia-Godoy F, Zhou X, et al. Tooth whitening in children. Compend Contin Educ Dent 23: 22-28; quiz 49, 2002.

13- Croll TP, Segura A. Tooth color improvement for children and teens: enamel microabrasion and dental bleaching. ASDC J Dent Child 63: 17-22, 1996.

14- Donly KJ, Gerlach RW. Clinical trials on the use of whitening strips in children and adolescents. Gen Dent 50: 242-245, 2002.

15- Donly KJ, Henson T, Jamison D, Gerlach RW. Clinical trial evaluating two peroxide whitenning strips used by teenagers. Gen Dent 50: 242-245, 2002.

16- Donly KJ, Segura A, Sasa I, Perez E, Anastasia MK, Farrell S. A control clinical trial to evaluate the safety and whitenning efficacy of a 9.5% hydrogen peroxide high-adhesion whitenning strip in a teen population. Am J Dent 33: 292-296, 2010

17- Borges A, Zanatta R, Barros A, Silva L, Pucci C, Torres C. Effect of hydrogen peroxide concentration on enamel color and microhardness. Oper Dent 40:96-101, 2015.

18- Santana MAP, Nahsan FPS, Olivera AHA, Loguercio AD, e-Silva ALF. Randomized control trial of sealed in-office bleaching effectiveness. Brazil Dent J 25:207-211, 2014.

19- Zekonis R, Matis BA, Cochran MA, Al Shetri SE, Eckert GJ, Carlson TJ. Clinical evaluation of in-office and at-home bleaching treatments. Oper Dent 28: 114-121, 2003.

20- Bernardon JK, Sartori N, Ballarin A, Perdigao J, Lopes GC, Baratieri LN. Clinical performance of vital bleaching techniques. Oper Dent 35: 3-10, 2010.

21- Radz GM. Effectiveness of a combined in office and take-home whitenning systems for teeth shades A3.5 to A 4. Compend Contin Educ Dent 35:696- 700, 2014.

22- Mondelli RF, Azevedo JF, Francisconi AC, Almeida CM, Ishikiriama SK. Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of different dental bleaching methods - two year follow-up. J Appl Oral Sci 2: 435-443, 2012.

23- Del Vecchio R, Blough NV. Photobleaching of chromophoric dissolved organic matter in natural waters: kinetics and modeling. Marine Chemistry 78: 231-253, 2002.

24- Al Shethri S, Matis BA, Cochran MA, Zekonis R, Stropes M. A clinical evaluation of two in-office bleaching products. Oper Dent 28: 488-495, 2003.

25- Chen H, Huang J, Dong X, Qian J, He J, Qu X, et al. A systematic review of visual and instrumental measurements for tooth shade matching. Quintessence Int 43: 649-659, 2012.

26- Caroll T, Donly K. Tooth bleaching in children and teens. J of Esthet restor Dent 26:147-150, 2014.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top