Article Data

  • Views 696
  • Dowloads 134

Original Research

Open Access

Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris using Two Niti Systems Associated with Two İrrigation Techniques in Primary Teeth

  • Ozge Erken Gungor1,*,
  • Alper Kustarci1

1From the University, Faculty of Dentistry, Antalya, Turkey.

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.6.490 Vol.40,Issue 6,November 2016 pp.490-495

Published: 01 November 2016

*Corresponding Author(s): Ozge Erken Gungor E-mail: erkentr@yahoo.com

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 2 NiTi file systems [Twisted File Adaptive (TFA) and Reciproc (RP)] and 2 irrigation techniques [Conventional needle irrigation (CNI) and Laser activated irrigation (LAI)] on the amount of apically extruded debris in primary maxillary molars. Study design:: Sixty extracted primary maxillary molars were randomly divided into 4 groups. The mesio-buccal roots of teeth in 4 groups were instrumented using TFA with LAI, RP with LAI, TFA with CNI and RP with CNI respectively. Debris extruded during instrumentation was collected into Eppendorf tubes and amounts were determined. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA test at 0.05 level of significance. Results: The results indicated all instrumentation and irrigation systems caused a measurable apical extrusion of debris. However, no statistically significant difference in debris extrusion was observed between irrigation techniques or instrumentation systems (P > 0.05). The total amount of debris extruded apically by LAI was greater than that by CNI. Conclusions: All instrumentation and irrigation techniques caused debris extrusion. However, the optimal laser activation time and power settings should be investigated to ensure minimal extrusion of debris and irrigant due to cavitation and pressure during LAI in root canal treatment.

Keywords

Debris extrusion, primary teeth, Twisted File Adaptive, Reciproc, Laser activated irrigation, Er,Cr:YSGG laser.

Cite and Share

Ozge Erken Gungor,Alper Kustarci. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris using Two Niti Systems Associated with Two İrrigation Techniques in Primary Teeth. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2016. 40(6);490-495.

References

1. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J Endod 11: 472-478, 1985.

2. Oncag O, Hosgor M, Hilmioglu S, et al. Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants. Int Endod J 36: 423-432, 2003.

3. Kocak S, Kocak MM, Saglam BC, et al. Apical extrusion of debris using self-adjusting file, reciprocating single-file, and 2 rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 39: 1278-1280, 2013.

4. Gutmann JL, Gao Y. Alteration in the inherent metallic and surface properties of nickel-titanium root canal instruments to enhance performance, durability and safety: a focused review. Int Endod J 45: 113-128, 2012.

5. Varela-Patino P, Ibanez-Parraga A, Rivas-Mundina B, et al. Alternating versus continuous rotation: a comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod 36: 157-159, 2010.

6. Al-Hadlaq SM, Aljarbou FA, AlThumairy RI. Evaluation of cyclic flexural fatigue of M-wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 36: 305-307, 2010.

7. Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instruments. J Endod 40: 1638-1641, 2014.

8. Deleu E, Meire MA, De Moor RJ. Efficacy of laser-based irrigant activation methods in removing debris from simulated root canal irregularities. Lasers Med Sci 831-835, 2015.

9. Lee SJ, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The effectiveness of syringe irrigation and ultrasonics to remove debris from simulated irregularities within prepared root canal walls. Int Endod J 37: 672-678, 2004.

10. De Moor RJ, Blanken J, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R. Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 2: evaluation of the efficacy. Lasers Surg Med 41: 520-523, 2009.

11. De Moor RJ, Meire M, Goharkhay K, Moritz A, Vanobbergen J. Efficacy of ultrasonic versus laser-activated irrigation to remove artificially placed dentin debris plugs. J Endod 36: 1580-1583, 2010.

12. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 32: 271-275, 1971.

13. Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endod 17: 275-279, 1991.

14. Kuştarcı A, Altunbas D, Akpınar KE. Comparative study of apically extruded debris using one manual and two rotary instrumentation techniques for endodontic treatment. J Dent Sci 7: 1-6, 2012.

15. Er K, Sumer Z, Akpinar KE. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J 38: 871-876, 2005.

16. Kustarci A, Akpinar KE, Er K. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105: 257-262, 2008.

17. Kustarci A, Akpinar KE, Sumer Z, Er K, Bek B. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J 41: 1066-1071, 2008.

18. Xavier F, Nevares G, Romeiro MK, et al. Apical extrusion of debris from root canals using reciprocating files associated with two irrigation systems. Int Endod J 2014.

19. Burklein S, Benten S, Schafer E. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with different single-file systems: Reciproc, F360 and OneShape versus Mtwo. Int Endod J 47: 405-409, 2014.

20. Burklein S, Schafer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating singlefile and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 38: 850-852, 2012.

21. Trevino EG, Patwardhan AN, Henry MA, et al. Effect of irrigants on the survival of human stem cells of the apical papilla in a platelet-rich plasma scaffold in human root tips. J Endod 37: 1109-1115, 2011.

22. Sonoyama W, Liu Y, Yamaza T, et al. Characterization of the apical papilla and its residing stem cells from human immature permanent teeth: a pilot study. J Endod 34: 166-171, 2008.

23. Cordeiro MM, Rocha MJ. The effects of periradicular inflamation and infection on a primary tooth and permanent successor. J Clin Pediatr Dent 29: 193-200, 2005.

24. al-Omari MA, Dummer PM. Canal blockage and debris extrusion with eight preparation techniques. J Endod 21: 154-158, 1995.

25. Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J 41: 339-344, 2008.

26. De-Deus G, Neves A, Silva EJ, et al. Apically extruded dentin debris by reciprocating single-file and multi-file rotary system. Clin Oral Investig 19: 357-361, 2015.

27. Kirchhoff AL, Fariniuk LF, Mello I. Apical Extrusion of Debris in Flat-oval Root Canals after Using Different Instrumentation Systems. J Endod 2014.

28. DiVito E, Olivi G. Review: Photoacoustic endodontics using PIPSTM: experimental background and clinical protocol. . J LAHA 1: 22-25, 2012.

29. Arslan H, Akcay M, Capar ID, et al. Efficacy of needle irrigation, EndoActivator, and photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming technique on removal of double and triple antibiotic pastes. J Endod 40: 1439-1442, 2014.

30. Arslan H, Capar ID, Saygili G, Gok T, Akcay M. Effect of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming on removal of apically placed dentinal debris. Int Endod J 47: 1072-1077, 2014.

31. Peeters HH, Suardita K. Efficacy of smear layer removal at the root tip by using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and erbium, chromium: yttrium, scandium, gallium garnet laser. J Endod 37: 1585-1589, 2011.

32. George R, Walsh LJ. Apical extrusion of root canal irrigants when using Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers with optical fibers: an in vitro dye study. J Endod 34: 706-708, 2008.

33. Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Verhaagen B, et al. The effect of needle-insertion depth on the irrigant flow in the root canal: evaluation using an unsteady computational fluid dynamics model. J Endod 36: 1664-1668, 2010.

34. Peters O, Koka R. Preparation of coronal and radicular spaces. . Ingle, JL, Bakland, LK, Baumgartner, JC Ingle’s endodontics. 6th ed. ed. Hamilton, Ontario: BC Decker Inc; 2008. p. 968.

35. Hmud R, Kahler WA, George R, Walsh LJ. Cavitational effects in aqueous endodontic irrigants generated by near-infrared lasers. J Endod 36: 275-278, 2010.

36. Mir M, Gutknecht N, Poprawe R, Vanweersch L, Lampert F. Visualising the procedures in the influence of water on the ablation of dental hard tissue with erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet and erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser pulses. Lasers Med Sci 24: 365-374, 2009.

37. De-Deus GA, Nogueira Leal Silva EJ, Moreira EJ, et al. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the self-adjusting file system. J Endod 40: 526-529, 2014.

38. Kim YJ, Chandler NP. Determination of working length for teeth with wide or immature apices: a review. Int Endod J 46: 483-491, 2013.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top