Volumetric Evaluation of Different Obturation Techniques in Primary Teeth Using Spiral Computed Tomography

Background: Various obturation techniques have been evaluated for better filling of the root canals in primary teeth using different methods. Spiral Computed Tomography (SCT) is a new revolution in the pediatric endodontics for assessment of quality of the obturation from 3 dimensions. Objectives: To evaluate the efficiency of 5 different obturation methods in delivering the filling material into the canals of primary teeth using Spiral Computed Tomography scan. Study design: A total of 50 canals of primary teeth were prepared, divided into 5 groups with 10 canals in each group and obturated with Zinc Oxide Eugenol cement using 5 different obturation techniques such as Local anesthetic syringe, Tuberculin syringe, Endodontic plugger, hand held Lentulo-spiral, and Lentulo-spiral mounted on slow speed hand piece. The pre and post obturation volume and finally the Percentage of Obturated Volume (POV) were calculated using SCT scan for each group. The data obtained was statistically analyzed using One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post-hoc test. Results: Lentulo-spiral hand held showed highest POV value followed by Lentulospiral mounted to hand piece, Tuberculin syringe and Endodontic plugger; whereas Anesthetic syringe had least POV (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Lentulo-spiral hand held is the best obturating technique among the 5 groups evaluated as the canals of this group showed maximum percentage of filled material. However, a further study with large sample size is highly essential.

primary teeth, obturation , Spiral CT, volumetric analysis

1. Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, Mctigue DJ, Fields HW, Nowak AJ. Pediatric Dentistry: infancy through adolescence. 4th ed. Phildelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 375-90, 2005.

2. Rodd HD, Waterhouse PJ, Fuks AB, Fayle SA, Moffat MA. British Society of Pediatric Dentistry. UK National Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry. Pulp therapy for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent, 16: 15-23, 2006.

3. Fuks AB. Pulp therapy for the primary and young permanent dentition. Dent Clin North Am 44: 571-96, 2000.

4. Memarpour M, Shahidi S, Meshki R. Comparison of different obturation techniques for primary molars by Digital Radiography. Pediatr Dent 35: 236-40, 2013.

5. Bhandari SK, Anita, Prajapati U. Root canal obturation of primary teeth: Disposable injection technique. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 30: 13-8, 2012.

6. Subba Reddy VV, Shakunthala B. Comparative assessment of three obturating techniques in primary molars: An in-vivo study. Endodontol, 9: 13-6, 1997.

7. Bawazir OA, Salama FS. Clinical evaluation of root canal obturation methods in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent, 28: 39-47, 2006.

8. Guelman M, McEachern M, Turner C. Pulpectomies in primary incisors using three delivery systems. An in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 28: 323-6, 2004.

9. Kositbowornchai S, Hnwachirapong D, Somsopon R, Pirmsinthavee S, Sooksuntisakoonchai N. Ex vivo comparison of digital images with conventional radiographs for detection of simulated voids in root canal filling material. Int Endod J, 39: 287-92, 2006.

10. Oliver CM, Abbott PV. Correlation between clinical success and apical dye penetration. Int Endod J, 34: 637-44, 2001.

11. Pommel L, Camps J. Effect of pressure and measurement time on the fluid filtration method in endodontics. J Endod, 27: 256-8, 2001.

12. Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN, Favieri A, Abad EC, Castro AJR, Gahyva SM. Bacterial leakage in coronally unsealed root canals obturated with 3 different techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 90: 647-50, 2000.

13. Anbu R, Nandini S, Velmurugan N. Volumetric analysis of root canal fillings using spiral computed tomography: An in vitro study. Int Endod J 43: 64-8, 2010.

14. Mittal N, Jain J. Spiral computed tomography assessment of the efficacy of different rotary versus hand retreatment system. J Conserv Dent 17: 8-12, 2014.

15. Saxena A, Singh A, Ikhar A, Chandak M. A rare case of maxillary first molar with single root and single canal diagnosed using spiral computed tomographic scan. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 32: 242-5, 2014.

16. Gopikrishna V, Bhargavi N, Kandaswamy D. Endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with a single root and a single canal diagnosed with the aid of spiral CT: A case report. J Endod, 32: 687-91, 2006.

17. Reuben J, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. The evaluation of root canal morphology of the mandibular first molar in an Indian population using spiral computed tomography scan: an in vitro study. J Endod, 34: 212-5, 2008.

18. Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Three dimensional evaluation of effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for retreatment of canals filled with different materials. J Endod 34:1370-3, 2008.

19. Torres CP, Apicella MJ, Yancich PP, Parker MH. Intracanal placement of calcium hydroxide: A comparison of techniques, revisited. J Endod, 30: 225-7, 2004.

20. Dandashi MB, Nazif MM, Zullo TT, Elliot MA, Schneider LG, Czonskowsky M. An in vitro comparison of three endodontic techniques in primary incisors. Pediatr Dent 15: 254-6, 1999.

21. Asokan S, Sooriaprakas, Radhu V, Bairavi R. Volumetric analysis of root canal fillings in primary teeth using Spiral computed tomography: An in vitro study. J Dent Child 79: 46-8, 2012.

22. Guelman M, McEachern M, Turner C. Pulpectomies in primary incisors using three delivery systems: An in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 28: 323-6, 2004.

23. Peters CI, Koka RS, Highsmith S, Peters OA. Calcium hydroxide dressings using different preparation and application modes: Density and dissolution by simulated tissue pressure. Int Endod J, 38; 889-95, 2005.

24. Aylard SR, Johnson R. Assessment of filling techniques for primary teeth. Pediatr Dent, 9: 195-8, 1987.

25. Grover R, Mehta M, Pandit K, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Gupta M. Clinical efficacy of various root canal obturating methods in primary teeth: a comparative study. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 14(2): 104-8, 2013.