Article Data

  • Views 2336
  • Dowloads 190

Original Research

Open Access

Detection of Respiratory Adverse Events in Pediatric Dental Patients Sedated With 0.75mg/Kg of Midazolam and Oxygen by Continuous

Pretracheal Auscultation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Mostafa Somri1,*,
  • Ibrahim Matter2
  • Christopher Hadjittofi3
  • Naser Hoash4
  • Bian Moaddi5
  • Johnny Kharouba6
  • Constantinos A Parisinos7
  • Benjamin Peretz8

1Department of Anesthesia, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel. The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

2Department of General Surgery, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel

3Department of HPB & Liver Transplant Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

4Department of Anesthesia, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel

5Western Galilee Hospital, Nahariya, Israel

6Department of Pediatric Dentistry, The Maurice & Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

7Department of Gastrointestinal Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom

8Department of Pediatric Dentistry, The Maurice & Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.2.154 Vol.41,Issue 2,March 2017 pp.154-160

Published: 01 March 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): Mostafa Somri E-mail: somri_m@yahoo.com

Abstract

Purpose: Sedation is becoming more commonplace for pediatric patients undergoing minor procedures. Fortunately, electronic monitors have contributed to a reduction in the associated respiratory adverse events (RAEs). To test the hypothesis that adding the pretracheal stethoscope (PTS) to standard monitoring methods (SMMs) may improve RAE detection in sedated pediatric dental patients, the frequency of RAEs detected by SMMs (i.e. visual observation, capnography, and pulse oximetry) was compared to that detected by SMMs alongside continuous PTS auscultation. Study design: A prospective, randomised, controlled trial was performed with 100 pediatric patient participants of ASA≤2, who were scheduled to receive dental treatment under 0.75 mg/kg and oxygen. Patients were randomised into Groups A (n=50; SMMs) and B (n=50; SMMs+PTS). Inclusion criteria were behavioral management problems and intolerance to dental treatment despite behavioral management techniques or nitrous oxide administration. Exclusion criteria were high-risk conditions for RAEs, altered mental status, gastrointestinal disorders, parental refusal of conscious sedation and failure of previous conscious sedation. An anesthesist was present throughout the dental treatments. Results: RAEs were detected in 10 (20%) and 22(44%) Group A and B patients respectively (p=0.01). The majority of RAEs within Group B were detected by PTS auscultation (n=19). Capnography produced 13 and 15 false-positive results in Groups A and B respectively, whereas the PTS produced 4(8%) false-positive results in Group B (p=0.009).Conclusions: PTS was found to be useful for detecting RAEs during pediatric dental sedation with 0.75mg/kg midazolam and oxygen, in the presence of an anesthesist.

Keywords

dental; sedation; monitoring; respiratory; pediatric.

Cite and Share

Mostafa Somri,Ibrahim Matter,Christopher Hadjittofi,Naser Hoash,Bian Moaddi,Johnny Kharouba,Constantinos A Parisinos,Benjamin Peretz. Detection of Respiratory Adverse Events in Pediatric Dental Patients Sedated With 0.75mg/Kg of Midazolam and Oxygen by ContinuousPretracheal Auscultation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2017. 41(2);154-160.

References

1. Committee on Drugs. American Academy of Pediatrics. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after seda-tion for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: addendum. Pediatrics.; 110:836–838. 2002.

2. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, Ad Hoc Committee on Sedation and Anesthesia. Guidelines on the Elective Use of Minimal, Moderate, and Deep Sedation and General Anesthesia for Pediatric Dental Patients. Chicago, IL: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2004. www.aapd.org/media/Policies_Guidelines/G_Sedation.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2006.

3. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Compre-hensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals: The Official Handbook by the JCAHO. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; 2005.

4. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology; 96:1004–1017. 2002.

5. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs: Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after seda-tion for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatrics; 89:1110-5. 1992.

6. Moore PA, Mickey EA, Hargreaves JA, et al. Sedation in pediatric dentistry: A practical assessment procedure. J Am Dent Assoc; 109:564-9. 1984.

7. Anderson JA, Vann WF Jr. Respiratory monitoring during pediatric seda-tion: pulse oximetry and capnography. Pediatr Dent; 10:94-101. 1988.

8. Guidelines for the elective use of conscious sedation, deep sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric patients. Pediatr Dent; 7:334-37. 1985.

9. Orkin FK, Cohen MM, Duncan PG. The quest for meaningful outcomes. Anesthesiology; 78:417-22. 1993.

10. Petty C. We do need precordial and esophageal stethoscopes. J Monit; 3:192-3. 1987.

11. Webster TA. Now that we have pulse oximeters and capnographs, we don’t need precordial and esophageal stethoscopes. J Clin Monit; 3:191-2. 1987.

12. Somri M, Parisinos CA, Kharouba J, et al. Optimising the dose of oral midazolam sedation for dental procedures in children: a prospective, randomised, and controlled study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2012; 22(4):271-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01192.x. Epub 2011 Nov 1.

13. Wilson KE, Welbury RR, Girdler NM. A randomised, controlled, cross-over trial of oral midazolam and nitrous oxide for paediatric dental seda-tion. Anaesthesia; 57:860-7. 2002.

14. Hosey MT, Blinkhorn AS. An evaluation of four methods of assessing the behaviour of anxious child dental patients. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1995; 5: 87-95.

15. Steward DJ. A simplified scoring system for the post-operative recovery room. Can Anaesth Soc J; 22:111-113. 1975.

16. Guidelines for the elective use of conscious sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia in pediatric patients. Committee on Drugs. Section on anesthesiology. Pediatrics.; 76:317-321. 1985.

17. American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, Coté CJ, et al. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: an update. Pediatrics; 118: 2587-2602. 2006.

18. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology; 84: 459- 471. 1996.

19. Fukayama H, Yagiela JA. Monitoring of vital signs during dental care. Int Dent J.; 56: 102-8. 2006.

20. Croswell RJ, Dilley DC, Lucas WJ, et al. A comparison of conventional versus electronic monitoring of sedated pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent. 1995; 17:332–339.

21. Bennett J, Peterson T, Burleson JA. Capnography and ventilatory assessment during ambulatory dentoalveolar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. ;55: 921-5; discussion 925-6. 1997.

22. Klepper ID, Webb RK, Van der Walt JH, et al. The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. The stethoscope: applications and limitations—an analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Intensive Care; 21: 575-8. 1993.

23. Weaver JM. Intraoperative management during conscious sedation and general anesthesia: patient monitoring and emergency treatment. Anesth Prog; 33:181-4. 1986.

24. Loeb RG. A measure of intraoperative attention to monitor displays. Anesth Analg; 76:337-41. 1993.

25. Becker DE, Casabianca AB. Respiratory Monitoring: Physiological and Technical Considerations. Anesth Prog.; 56:14-22. 2009.

26. Watson A, Visram A. Survey of the use of oesophageal and precordial stethoscopes in current paediatric anaesthetic practice. Paediatr Anaesth; 11: 437-42. 2001.

27. Prielipp RC, Kelly JS, Roy RC. Use of esophageal or precordial stethoscopesby anesthesia providers: Are we listening to our patients? J Clin Anesth; 7(5):367-72. 1995

Submission Turnaround Time

Top