Article Data

  • Views 877
  • Dowloads 182

Original Research

Open Access

Post-Discharge Events Occurring after Dental Treatment under Deep Sedation in Pediatric Patients

  • Esti Davidovich1,*,
  • Liron Meltzer1
  • Jacob Efrat1
  • David Gozal1
  • Diana Ram1

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, The Hebrew University Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.3.232 Vol.41,Issue 3,May 2017 pp.232-235

Published: 01 May 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): Esti Davidovich E-mail: dr-st@012.net.il

Abstract

Purpose: Deep sedation is often required in dentistry for treating children with uncooperative behavior. We assessed immediate post-sedation events during the first 24 hours after dental treatment under deep sedation in children, and examined correlations to a number of variables. Study design: Information was collected from medical files for a convenience sample of children between the ages of 1 and 16, who were treated under deep sedation at one clinic (propofol alone or combined with a sedative agent). Parents were interviewed by telephone regarding the first 24 hours following treatment.

Results: Among 32 children under age 6 years, 26 (81.3%) had at least one post sedation complication, compared to 19/22 (86.4%) aged 6 and older, p>0.05. According to parent report, 13 (59.1%) of the older children had pain, compared to 6 (18.8%) of the younger ones, p=0.002. For no patient in the younger group compared to 18.2% in the older group was dizziness reported as a complication, p=0.023. Among those who received a sedative agent, 93.3% had one or more complications; 26.7% had nausea or vomiting. The respective rates were 79.5% and 5.1% among those treated only with propofol. Conclusions: Though safe, deep sedation poses complications and adverse events.

Keywords

deep sedation, dental treatment, post-discharge events, children

Cite and Share

Esti Davidovich,Liron Meltzer,Jacob Efrat,David Gozal,Diana Ram. Post-Discharge Events Occurring after Dental Treatment under Deep Sedation in Pediatric Patients. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2017. 41(3);232-235.

References

1. Policy on the use of deep sedation and general anesthesia in the pedi-atric dental office. American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Ad Hoc Committee on Sedation and Anesthesia; American Academy on Pedi-atric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Pediatr Dent 2014-;36 (6 Suppl):82-83. 2015.

2. Olabi NF, Jones JE, Saxen MA, et al. Anesth Prog;59:12-17. 2012.

3. Arya VS, Damle SG. Comparative evaluation of Midazolam and Propofol as intravenous sedative agents in the management of uncooperative chil-dren. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent;20(1):6-8. 2002.

4. Lourenco-Matharu L, Roberts GJ. Effectiveness and acceptability of intra-venous sedation in child and adolescent dental patients: report of a case series at King’s College Hospital, London. Brit Dent J;210:567-572.2011.

5. Cravero JP, Beach ML, Blike GT, Gallagher SM, Hertzog JH; Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. The incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia with propofol for procedures outside the operating room: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Anesth Analg;108(3):795-804. 2009.

6. Ozer L, Oktem ZB, Küçükyavuz Z. Effects of deep sedation on behav-iors and side effects in children undergoing different dental procedures. Pediatr Dent;33(2):158-64. 2011.

7. Dosani FZ, Flaitz CM, Whitmire HC Jr, Vance BJ, Hill JR. Postdis-charge events occurring after pediatric sedation for dentistry Pediatr Dent.;36(5):411-6. 2014.

8. Martinez D, Wilson S. Children sedated for dental care: a pilot study of the 24-hour post sedation period Pediatr Dent.;28(3):260-4. 2006.

9. von Baeyer CL, Uman LS, Chambers CT, Gouthro A. Can we screen young children for their ability to provide accurate self-reports of pain Pain;152(6):1327-33. 2011.

10. Stanford EA Chambers CT, Craig KD The role of developmental factors in predicting young children’s use of a self-report scale for pain. Pain;120(1-2):16-23. 2006.

11. Alletag MJ, Auerbach MA, Baum CR. Ketamine, propofol, and ketofol use for pediatric sedation. Pediatr Emerg Care;28(12):1391-5. 2012.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top