Post-Discharge Events Occurring after Dental Treatment under Deep Sedation in Pediatric Patients

Purpose: Deep sedation is often required in dentistry for treating children with uncooperative behavior. We assessed immediate post-sedation events during the first 24 hours after dental treatment under deep sedation in children, and examined correlations to a number of variables. Study design: Information was collected from medical files for a convenience sample of children between the ages of 1 and 16, who were treated under deep sedation at one clinic (propofol alone or combined with a sedative agent). Parents were interviewed by telephone regarding the first 24 hours following treatment.

Results: Among 32 children under age 6 years, 26 (81.3%) had at least one post sedation complication, compared to 19/22 (86.4%) aged 6 and older, p>0.05. According to parent report, 13 (59.1%) of the older children had pain, compared to 6 (18.8%) of the younger ones, p=0.002. For no patient in the younger group compared to 18.2% in the older group was dizziness reported as a complication, p=0.023. Among those who received a sedative agent, 93.3% had one or more complications; 26.7% had nausea or vomiting. The respective rates were 79.5% and 5.1% among those treated only with propofol. Conclusions: Though safe, deep sedation poses complications and adverse events.

deep sedation, dental treatment, post-discharge events, children

1. Policy on the use of deep sedation and general anesthesia in the pedi-atric dental office. American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Ad Hoc Committee on Sedation and Anesthesia; American Academy on Pedi-atric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Pediatr Dent 2014-;36 (6 Suppl):82-83. 2015.

2. Olabi NF, Jones JE, Saxen MA, et al. Anesth Prog;59:12-17. 2012.

3. Arya VS, Damle SG. Comparative evaluation of Midazolam and Propofol as intravenous sedative agents in the management of uncooperative chil-dren. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent;20(1):6-8. 2002.

4. Lourenco-Matharu L, Roberts GJ. Effectiveness and acceptability of intra-venous sedation in child and adolescent dental patients: report of a case series at King’s College Hospital, London. Brit Dent J;210:567-572.2011.

5. Cravero JP, Beach ML, Blike GT, Gallagher SM, Hertzog JH; Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. The incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia with propofol for procedures outside the operating room: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Anesth Analg;108(3):795-804. 2009.

6. Ozer L, Oktem ZB, Küçükyavuz Z. Effects of deep sedation on behav-iors and side effects in children undergoing different dental procedures. Pediatr Dent;33(2):158-64. 2011.

7. Dosani FZ, Flaitz CM, Whitmire HC Jr, Vance BJ, Hill JR. Postdis-charge events occurring after pediatric sedation for dentistry Pediatr Dent.;36(5):411-6. 2014.

8. Martinez D, Wilson S. Children sedated for dental care: a pilot study of the 24-hour post sedation period Pediatr Dent.;28(3):260-4. 2006.

9. von Baeyer CL, Uman LS, Chambers CT, Gouthro A. Can we screen young children for their ability to provide accurate self-reports of pain Pain;152(6):1327-33. 2011.

10. Stanford EA Chambers CT, Craig KD The role of developmental factors in predicting young children’s use of a self-report scale for pain. Pain;120(1-2):16-23. 2006.

11. Alletag MJ, Auerbach MA, Baum CR. Ketamine, propofol, and ketofol use for pediatric sedation. Pediatr Emerg Care;28(12):1391-5. 2012.