Clinical Performance of Heat-Cured High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Class II Restorations in Primary Molars: A Preliminary Study

Objectives: The present preliminary study evaluated the clinical and radiographic performances of heat-cured high viscosity glass ionomer (HCHVGI) in class II restorations of primary molars. Study design: A retrospective study on a cohort of patients who had dental caries restored at a private practice was conducted. Restorations were evaluated radiographically and photographically by two separate examiners. Results: Ninety-three Class II restorations in 44 patients (average age: 108 months ± 25.3, 24 males, 20 females) were examined. Average recall time was 22.2 months ± 4.2. All but three restorations (96.8%) were present and intact, with no incidents of secondary caries. Three additional restorations had occlusal defects that required retreatment, resulting in an overall success rate of 93.5%. Ninety-seven percent of the restorations were rated optimal for marginal integrity with no staining of the restoration surfaces. No patients complained of post-operative sensitivity. The most common flaw found was a concavity on the proximal wall of the cavity box (27%, mean age 16 months ± 3.9). Conclusion: The findings in this preliminary study suggest that heat cured high viscosity glass ionomer cement may be an effective restorative material for Class II restorations in primary molars that are a year or two from shedding.

Glass ionomer, Primary Teeth, Dental Materials

1. Qvist V, Poulsen A, Teglers PT, Mjor IA. The longevity of different restorations in primary teeth. International journal of paediatric dentistry / the British Paedodontic Society [and] the International Association of Dentistry for Children. 20(1):1-7, 2010.

2. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer. Eur J Oral Sci. 112(2):188-96, 2004.

3. Weinstein P. Public health issues in early childhood caries. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology. 26(1 Suppl):84-90, 1998.

4. Yengopal V, Harneker SY, Patel N, Siegfried N. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.(2):CD004483, 2009.

5. Tran LA, Messer LB. Clinicians’ choices of restorative materials for chil-dren. Aust Dent J. 48(4):221-32, 2003.

6. Vidnes-Kopperud S, Tveit AB, Gaarden T, Sandvik L, Espelid I. Factors influencing dentists’ choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients. Acta odontologica Scandinavica. 67(2):74-9, 2009.

7. Croll TP, Bar-Zion Y, Segura A, Donly KJ. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retro-spective evaluation. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 132(8):1110-6, 2001.

8. Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Borges AF, Silva TN, Puppin-Rontani RM, et al. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results. J Dent. 34(6):381-8, 2006.

9. Rastelli FP, de Sousa Vieira R, Rastelli MC. Posterior composite resto-rations in primary molars: an in vivo comparison of three restorative tech-niques. The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. 25(3):227-30, 2001.

10. Roen EL, Wang Y, Calafat AM, Wang S, Margolis A, Herbstman J, et al. Bisphenol A exposure and behavioral problems among inner city children at 7-9 years of age. Environ Res. 142:739-45, 2015.

11. Chung SY, Kwon H, Choi YH, Karmaus W, Merchant AT, Song KB, et al. Dental composite fillings and bisphenol A among children: a survey in South Korea. Int Dent J. 62(2):65-9, 2012.

12. McKinney C, Rue T, Sathyanarayana S, Martin M, Seminario AL, DeRouen T. Dental sealants and restorations and urinary bisphenol A concentrations in children in the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 145(7):745-50, 2014.

13. Nicholson JW, Braybrook JH, Wasson EA. The biocompatibility of glass-poly(alkenoate) (Glass-Ionomer) cements: a review. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2(4):277-85, 1991.

14. Forsten L. Short- and long-term fluoride release from glass ionomers and other fluoride-containing filling materials in vitro. Scand J Dent Res. 98(2):179-85, 1990.

15. Tam LE, Chan GP, Yim D. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent. 22(1):4-14, 1997.

16. Toh SL, Messer LB. Evidence-based assessment of tooth-colored resto-rations in proximal lesions of primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 29(1):8-15, 2007.

17. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Kramer N. Viscous glass-ionomer cements: a new alternative to amalgam in the primary dentition? Quintessence Int. 28(10):667-76, 1997.

18. Kleverlaan CJ, van Duinen RN, Feilzer AJ. Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements affected by curing methods. Dent Mater. 20(1):45-50, 2004.

19. Yap AU, Pek YS, Cheang P. Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative. J Oral Rehabil. 30(1):1-8, 2003.

20. Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, de Gee AJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ. The influence of accelerating the setting rate by ultrasound or heat on the bond strength of glass ionomers used as orthodontic bracket cements. Eur J Orthod. 27(5):472-6, 2005.

21. Dogan A, Hubbezoglu I, Dogan OM, Bolayir G, Demir H. Temperature rise induced by various light curing units through human dentin. Dent Mater J. 28(3):253-60, 2009.

22. Thanjal NK, Billington RW, Shahid S, Luo J, Hill RG, Pearson GJ. Kinetics of fluoride ion release from dental restorative glass ionomer cements: the influence of ultrasound, radiant heat and glass composition. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 21(2):589-95, 2010.

23. Kuter B, Eden E, Yildiz H. The effect of heat on the mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 14(2):90-4, 2013.

24. Menne-Happ U, Ilie N. Effect of heat application on the mechanical behaviour of glass ionomer cements. Clin Oral Investig. 18(2):643-50, 2014.

25. Dehurtevent M, Deveaux E, Hornez JC, Robberecht L, Tabary N, Chai F. Influence of heat and ultrasonic treatments on the setting and maturation of a glass-ionomer cement. American journal of dentistry. 28(2):105-10, 2015.

26. Fabian Molina G, Cabral RJ, Mazzola I, Brain Lascano L, Frencken JE. Biaxial flexural strength of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cements heat-cured with an LED lamp during setting. Biomed Res Int. 2013:838460, 2013.

27. Gorseta K, Glavina D, Skrinjaric I. Influence of ultrasonic excitation and heat application on the microleakage of glass ionomer cements. Aust Dent

J. 57(4):453-7, 2012.

28. Yee R. An ART field study in western Nepal. International dental journal. 51(2):103-8, 2001.

29. American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical A. Policy on interim therapeutic restorations (ITR). Pediatr Dent. 30(7 Suppl):38-9, 2008.

30. Rutar J, McAllan L, tyas MJ. Three-year clinical performance of glass ionomer cement in primary molars. International journal of paediatric dentistry / the British Paedodontic Society [and] the International Associa-tion of Dentistry for Children. 12(2):146-7, 2002.

31. Boye U, Willasey A, Walsh T, Tickle M, Pretty IA. Comparison of an intra-oral photographic caries assessment with an established visual caries assessment method for use in dental epidemiological studies of children. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology. 41(6):526-33, 2013.

32. Pereira LC, Nunes MC, Dibb RG, Powers JM, Roulet JF, Navarro MF. Mechanical properties and bond strength of glass-ionomer cements. J Adhes Dent. 4(1):73-80, 2002.

33. van Duinen RN. New approach for handling glass ionomers in restorative dentistry. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 28(3):8-13, 68, 2011.

34. Scholtanus JD, Huysmans MC. Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study. J Dent. 35(2):156-62, 2007.

35. Braun A, Kecsmar S, Krause F, Berthold M, Frentzen M, Frankenberger R, et al. Effect of simulated pulpal fluid circulation on intrapulpal temperature following irradiation with an Nd:YVO4 laser. Lasers Med Sci. 30(4):1197-202, 2015.