SEM Analysis of Residual Dentin Surface in Primary Teeth Using Different Chemomechanical Caries Removal Agents

Background: The purpose of this in vitro study was to analyze the residual dentinal surfaces following caries removal using two chemomechanical methods (Papacarie Duo and Carie Care), by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Study design: Twenty extracted primary molars with active occlusal carious lesions were randomly assigned two groups depending on the CMCR agent used for the caries excavation – Group 1 – with Papacarie Duo and Group – 2 with Carie Care. After the caries excavation, the specimens were subjected to SEM analysis. Results: Though both the agents showed the minimal smear layer with the patent dentinal tubules, Carie care showed patent dentinal tubules with a clearly exposed peritubular and intertubular collagen network. Conclusion: Carie Care treated surface exhibited better surface morphology of residual dentin.

SEM, residual dentin, chemomechanical caries removal, Carie care, primary teeth

1. Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, & Balooch M. The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. Journal of Dent 25(6): 441-458, 1997.

2. Corrêa FNP, Rodrigues Filho LE, Rodrigues Delgado CRM. Evalua-tion of residual dentin after conventional and chemomechanical caries removal using SEM. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 32(2): 115-120, 2007.

3. Beeley JA, Yip HK and Stevenson AG. Chemochemical caries removal: a review of the techniques and latest developments. Br Dent J 188(8):

427- 430, 2000.

4. Ramamoorthi S, Nivedhitha MSB, Vanajassun PP. Effect of two different chemomechanical caries removal agents on dentin microhardness: An in vitro study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry 16(5): 429-433, 2013.

5. Corrêa FN, Rocha RDE, Rodrigues Filho LE, Muench A, Rodrigues Delgado CRM. Chemical versus conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: A microhardness study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 31(3):

187- 192, 2007.

6. Kotb RM, Abdella AA, El Kateb MA, Ahmed AM. Clinical evaluation of Papacarie in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 34(2): 117-23, 2009.

7. Matsumoto SFB, Motta LJ, Alfaya TA, Guedes CC, Fernandes KPS, Bussadori SK, Assessment of chemomechanical removal of carious lesions using Papacarie Duo ™: Randomized longitudinal clinical trial. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 24(4): 488-492, 2013.

8. Motta LJ, Martins MD, Porta KP, Bussadori SK. Aesthetic restoration of deciduous anterior teeth after removal of carious tissue with Papacarie. Indian J Dental Res. 20(1): 117-120, 2009.

9. Lopes MC, Mascarini RC, Garcia da Silva BMC, Florio FM, Basting RT. Papain-based Gel for Caries Removal on Dentin Shear Bond Strength. Journal of Dentistry for Children 74(2): 93-97, 2007.

10. Bussadori SK, Castro LC, Galvao AC. Papain gel: a new chemomechan-ical caries removal agent. J Clin Pediatr Dent 30(2): 115–119, 2005.

11. Venkataraghavan K, Kush A, Lakshminarayana C, Diwakar L, Ravikumar P, Patil S, Karthik S. Chemomechanical Caries Removal: A Review & Study of an Indigen-ously Developed Agent (Carie Care (TM) Gel) In Children. J Int Oral Health 5(4):84-90, 2013.

12. Thakur R, Patil S, Kush A. Chemo-mechanical Caries removal tech-nology – Dentistry at ease. Indian Dentist 9(3): 22-27, 2014.

13. CDC. Guidelines for infection control in dental health-care settings .mmwor2003; 52(RR17):1-66, 2003.

14. Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Morphological study of demin-eralized dentin after caries removal using two different methods. Aust Dent J 47(2): 116–122, 2002.

15. Hosoya Y, Kawashita Y, Marshall GW Jr, Goto G. Influence of Carisolv for resin adhesion to sound human primary dentin and young permanent dentin. J Dent. 29(3): 163-171, 2001.

16. Alleman DS, Magne P. A systematic approach to deep caries removal end points: The peripheral seal concept in adhesive dentistry. Quintessence Int 43:197-208, 2012.

17. Magne P, Oganesyan T. CT scan based finite elemental analysis of premolar cuspal defelction following operative procedures. Int J of Peri-odontics Restorative Dent 29: 361-546, 2009.

18. Fusayama T. Intratubular crystal deposition and remineralization of carious dentin. J Biol Buccale 19: 255-262, 1991.

19. Arora R, Goswami M, Chaudhary S, Chaitra TR, Kishore A, Rallan M. Comparative evaluation of effects of chemomechanical and conventional caries removal on dentinal morphology and its bonding characteristics –A SEM study. Eur Arch of Ped Dent 13(4): 179-183, 2012.

20. Cardoso PEC, Moura SK, Miranda Júnior WGM, Santos JFF, Tavares AU. Carisolv as an alternative method for caries removal. Revista da Postgraduacao 11(2): 109–113, 2004.

21. Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Morphological study of demin-eralized dentin after caries removal using two different methods. Aust Dent J 47(2): 116–122, 2002.

22. Marshall, GW, Habelitz S, Gallagher R, Balooch M, Balooch G, & Marshall SJ Nanomechanical properties of hydrated carious human dentin. Journal of Dental Research 80(8): 1768-1771, 2001.

23. Ogawa K, Yamashita Y, Ichijo T, & Fusayama T. The ultrastructure and hardness of the transparent layer of human carious dentin. Journal of Dental Research 62(1):7-10, 1983.

24. Wefel JS. Root caries histopathology and chemistry. Am J of Dent 7: 261- 265, 1994.

25. Perdigao J. Dentin bonding-variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Mater 26: e24-37, 2010.

26. Kinney JH, Balooch M, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr, & Weihs TP. Hard-ness and young’s modulus of human peritubular and intertubular dentin. Archives of Oral Biology 41(1): 9-13, 1996.

27. Kinney JH, Balooch M, Marshall GW, & Marshall SJ. A micromechanics model of the elastic properties of human dentin. Archives of oral Biology 44(10): 813-822, 1999.

28. Hosoya Y, Marshall SJ, Watanabe LG, & Marshall GW. Microhardness of carious deciduous dentin. Operative Dentistry 25(2): 81-89, 2000.

29. Tonami KI, Araki K, Mataki S, Kurosaki N. Effect of chloramines and sodium hypochlorite on carious dentin. J Med Dent Sci 50: 139-146, 2003.

30. Teodorovici MP, Sandu AV, Pancu G, Stoleriu S, & Andrian S. A compar-ative study on the topography of the dentinary surface resulting after the removal of pathological tissues by various techniques. Odontology 14(4): 278- 282, 2010.

31. Grespan R, Paludo M, Lemos HDP, Barbosa CP, Bersani-Amado CA, Dalalio MMDO, & Cuman RKN. Anti-arthritic effect of eugenol on colla-gen-induced arthritis experimental model. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 35(10): 1818-1820, 2012.