Article Data

  • Views 945
  • Dowloads 239

Original Research

Open Access

A Clinical Evaluation of Deproteinization and Different Cavity Designs on Resin Restoration Performance in MIH-Affected Molars: Two-Year Results

  • Hayriye Sönmez1,*,
  • Sinem Saat1

1Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey.

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.5.336 Vol.41,Issue 5,September 2017 pp.336-342

Published: 01 September 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): Hayriye Sönmez E-mail: hayriyesonmez@hotmail.com

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effects of deproteinization of the hypomineralized enamel and different cavity designs on the performance of the composite resin restorations(CRRs) placed into the cavities of MIH (molar incisor hypomineralization)-affected molars. Study design: 95 MIH-affected permanent first molars (PFMs) and 31 caries but not MIH- affected PFMs (126 teeth in total) were included in the study. The MIH-affected molars were divided into three groups. In Group I, all hypomineralized tissue was removed until healthy enamel was reached. In Group II, carious and cheesy hypomineralized tissue was removed until a reasonable resistance was detected in the hypomineralized tissue. In Group III, cavities designed as Group II, differently from this group deproteinization of the left hypomineralized tissue was performed prior to the placement of CRRs. Group IV served as the control group consisting of unaffected carious PFMs. Restorations were evaluated according to modified USPHS criteria for 24 months. Results: The retention rates were 93.7% for Group I, 80.7% for Group II, 93.5% for Group III and 100% for Group IV. The success rate for the restorations in Group II proved significantly lower (p<0.05) than that of the other three groups. No significant difference in success rates was observed between Group I, Group III and Group IV (p>0.05) at the end of 24 months. Conclusions: Failure of the restorations was predominant in the group that the hypomineralized tissue was left surrounding the cavities. Deproteinization of the hypomineralized enamel was found to enhance the retention rates of CRRs.

Keywords

Molar Incisor Hypomineralization, composite resin restoration, , deproteinization.

Cite and Share

Hayriye Sönmez,Sinem Saat. A Clinical Evaluation of Deproteinization and Different Cavity Designs on Resin Restoration Performance in MIH-Affected Molars: Two-Year Results. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2017. 41(5);336-342.

References

1. Weerheijm KL, Jalevik B, Alaluusua S. Molar incisor hypomineralization. Caries Res; 35(5): 390-391. 2001.

2. Willmott NS,Bryan RA, Duggal MS. Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization: A literature review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 9(4): 172-179. 2008.

3. Jälevik B. Prevelance and diagnosis of molar-incisor hypomineralization (MIH): A systemic review .Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 11(2):59-64. 2010.

4. Sonmez H, Yildirim G, Bezgin T. The prevalence and severity of molar incisor hypomineralization in a group of children living in Ankara Turkey. Clin Dent Res; 37(1): 35-41. 2013.

5. Weerheijm KL. Molar incisor hypomineralisation Eur Pediatr Dent; 4(3): 115-120. 2003.

6. Lygidakis NA, Dimou G, Briseniou E. Molar-Incisor hypomineralization (MIH). Retrospective clinical study in Greek children. I. Prevalence and defect characteristics. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 9(4):200-206. 2008.

7. William V, Massler LB, Burrow MF. Molar-Incisor- Hypomineralisation: Review and recommendations for clinical management. Pediatr Dent; 28(3): 224-232. 2006.

8. Lygidakis NA, Chaliasou A, Siounas G. Evaluation of composite restorations in hypomineralised permanent molars: a four-year clinical trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent; 4(3):143-148. 2003.

9. Mejare I, Bergman E, Grindefjord M. Hypomineralized molars and incisors of unknown origin: treatment outcome at age 18 years. Int J Paediatr Dent; 15(1): 20-28. 2005.

10. Kotsanos N, Kaklamanos EG, Arapostathis K. Treatment management of first permanent molars in children with Molar-Incisor Hypomineralisation. Eur J Paediatr Dent; 6(4):179-184. 2005.

11. Jalevik B, Klingberg GA. Dental treatment, dental fear and behaviour management problems in children with severe enamel hypomineralization of their permanent first molars. Int J Paediatr Dent; 12(1): 24-32. 2002.

12. Venezie RD, Vadiakas G, Christensen JR et al. Enemal pretreatment with sodium hypochlorite to enhance bonding in hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta: case report and SEM analysis. Pediatr Dent; 16(6): 433-436. 1994.

13. Saroglu I, Aras S, Oztas D.ed sound enamel.mental groups were compared with the control group which involved unaffected sound enamel. Effect of deprotenization on composite bond strength in hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta. Oral Dis; 12(3): 305-308. 2006.

14. Mathu-Muju K, Wright JT. Diagnosis and treatment of molar incisor hypomineralisation. Compend Contin Educ Dent; 27(11):604-610. 2006.

15. Fayle SA. Molar incisor hypomineralization: Restorative management. Eur J Paediatr Dent; 4(3): 121-126. 2003.

16. Weerheijm KL, Duggal M, Mejàre I, Papagiannoulis L, Koch G, Martens LC, Hallonsten AL. Judgement criteria for molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) in epidemiologic studies: a summary of the European meeting on MIH held in Athens, 2003. Eur J Paediatr Dent; 4(3): 110-113. 2003.

17. Cvar JF, Ryge G (1971) Criteria for the Clinical Evaluation of Dental Restorative Materials US Public Health Service Publication No 790-244 San Francisco: Government Printing Office.

18. Suckling GW, Nelson DG, Patel MJ. Macroscopic and scanning electron microscopic appearance and hardness values of developmental defects in human permanent tooth enamel. Adv Dent Res; 3(2): 219-233. 1989.

19. Fagrell TG, Wolfram D, Jalevik B, Noren JG. Chemical, mechanical and morphological properties of hypominerailzed enamel of first permanent teeth. Acta Odon Scand; 68 (4): 215-222. 2010.

20. Mahoney EK, Farah R. Molar incisor hypomineralization: Structure,composition and properties. İn: Planning and care for children and adolescents with dental enamel defects. Bernadette K. Drummond, Nicola Kilpatrick. Springer,Berlin;73-84. 2015.

21.Jalevik B, Dietz W, Noren JG. Scanning electron micrograph analysis of hypomineralized enamel in permanent fi rst molars. Int J Paediatr Dent.;15(4):233–40. 2005.

22. William V, Burrow MF, Palamara JE, Messer LB. Microshearbond strength of resin composite to teeth affected by molar hypomineralization using 2 adhesive systems. Pediatr Dent; 28(3): 223-241. 2006.

23. Hosein I, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. Enamel loss during bonding,debonding and clean-up with use of self etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 126(6): 717-724. 2004.

24. Sapir S, Shapira J. Clinical solutions for developmental defects of enamel and dentin in children. Pediatr Dent; 29(4): 330-6. 2007.

25. Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater; 21(4): 375-383. 2005.

26. Miguez PA, Castro PS, Nunes MF, Walter R, Pereira PN. Effect of acidetching on the enamel bond of two self-etching systems. J Adhes Dent; 5(2): 107-122. 2003.

27. Wright JT. The etch-bleach seal technique for managing stained enamel defects in young permanent incisors. Pediatr Dent; 24(3):249-252. 2002.

28. Fragelli CMB, de Souza JF,Jeremias F, Cordeiro RCL,Santos-Pinto L. Molar incisor hypomineralization(MI): conservative treatment management to restore affected teeth. Molar Incisor. Braz Oral Res;29(1): 1-7. 2015.

29.de Oliveira DC, Favretto CO, Cunha RF. Molar incisor hypomineralization: Considerations about treatment in a controlled longitudinal case. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; Apr-Jun 33(2) 152-155. 2015.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top