Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Caries Progression Rate in Primary Teeth: A Retrospective Study
1Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
2Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, P.O.Box 12272, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel.
DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.5.358 Vol.41,Issue 5,September 2017 pp.358-361
Published: 01 September 2017
*Corresponding Author(s): Moti Moskovitz E-mail: motim@md.huji.ac.il
The rate of caries progression in primary teeth has rarely been studied, with most studies on early childhood caries reporting the percentage of lesions that remain at a certain stage of disease over a period of time. The aim of the present study was to examine the prevalence and behavior of proximal and occlusal carious lesions in primary teeth among children from low socio- economic status. Study design: This retrospective study was based on bite-wing radiographs of 95 children aged 5- 12 taken at 6-12 months intervals, with a follow-up period of at least three years. One hundred thirty-five teeth and 141 tooth surfaces were examined. The degree of proximal surfaces and occlusal caries advancement was scored and statistical analyses (Mann-Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis and Kaplan-Meier analysis) were performed to evaluate caries progression rate. Results: The results revealed that approximately 0.8 years were required for a carious lesion to progress from the outer enamel to the dentino-enamel junction, and an additional 1.4 years for it to reach the inner part of the dentin. Conclusions: The caries progression rate found in the present study is more rapid than previously found and affects more the lower socio economic population.
proximal caries, caries progression, primary teeth.
Nili Tickotsky, Roy Petel, Rabi Araki, Moti Moskovitz. Caries Progression Rate in Primary Teeth: A Retrospective Study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2017; 41(5): 358-361. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.5.358
1. Arrow P. Incidence and progression of approximal carious lesions among school children in Western Australia. Australia Dent J;52(3): 216-226. 2007.
2. Mejare I, Kallestal C, Stenlund H, Johansson H. Caries development from 11 to 22 years of age: a prospective radiographic study. Prevalence and distribution. Caries res.;32(1):10-16. 1998.
3. Pitts NB. Monitoring of caries progression in permanent and primary posterior approximal enamel by bitewing radiography. Com Dent and Oral Epid;11(4):228-235. 1983.
4. Hintze H. Caries behaviour in Danish teenagers: a longitudinal radiographic study. International journal of paediatric dentistry / the British Paedodontic Society [and] the Inl Assn Dent Children ;7(4):227-234. 1997.
5. Rugarabamu PG, Poulsen S, Masalu JR. A longitudinal study of occlusal caries among schoolchildren in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Com Dent and Oral Epid. 2002;30(1):47-51.
6. Gustafsson A, Svenson B, Edblad E, Jansson L. Progression rate of approximal carious lesions in Swedish teenagers and the correlation between caries experience and radiographic behavior. An analysis of the survival rate of approximal caries lesions. Acta Odont Scand.;58(5):195-200. 2000.
7. Ridell K, Olsson H, Mejare I. Unrestored dentin caries and deep dentin restorations in Swedish adolescents. Caries Res.;42(3):164-170. 2008.
8. Gruythuysen RJ, van der Linden LW, Woltgens JH, Geraets WG. Differences between primary and permanent teeth in posteruptive age dependency of radiological changes in enamel during the development of approximal caries. J de biologie buccale.;20(1):59-62. 1992.
9. Parisotto TM, Santos MN, Rodrigues LK, Costa LS. Behavior and progression of early carious lesions in early childhood: a 1-year follow-up study. J Dent Children (Chicago, Ill.).;79(3):130-135. 2012
10. Warren JJ, Levy SM, Broffitt B, Kanellis MJ. Longitudinal study of non-cavitated carious lesion progression in the primary dentition. J Pub Health Dent. 2006;66(2):83-87.
11. Autio-Gold JT, Tomar SL. Prevalence of noncavitated and cavitated carious lesions in 5-year-old head start schoolchildren in Alachua County, Florida. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27(1):54-60.
12. Guideline on caries-risk assessment and management for infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatr Dent.;35(5):E157-164. 2013.
13. Guerrieri A, Gaucher C, Bonte E, Lasfargues JJ. Minimal intervention dentistry: part 4. Detection and diagnosis of initial caries lesions. Br Dent J.;213(11):551-557. 2012.
14. Mejare I, Stenlund H, Julihn A, Larsson I, Permert L. Influence of approximal caries in primary molars on caries rate for the mesial surface of the first permanent molar in swedish children from 6 to 12 years of age. Caries Res;35(3):178-185. 2001.
15. Vanderas AP, Manetas C, Koulatzidou M, Papagiannoulis L. Progression of proximal caries in the mixed dentition: a 4-year prospective study. Pediatr Dent.;25(3):229-234. 2003.
16. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Lim S, Willem JM. Predictors of dental caries progression in primary teeth. J Dent Res; 88(3):270-275. 2009.
17. Reich E, Lussi A, Newbrun E. Caries-risk assessment. Inter Dent J; 49(1):15-26. 1999.
18. Shwartz M, Grondahl HG, Pliskin JS, Boffa J. A longitudinal analysis from bite-wing radiographs of the rate of progression of approximal carious lesions through human dental enamel. Arch Oral Biol.;29(7):529-536. 1984.
Top