Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Effect of Qmix and Other Irrigants on Dentin Adhesives in Pulp Chambers of Primary Teeth: SEM Study
1Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kothiwal Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, India.
DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.5.363 Vol.41,Issue 5,September 2017 pp.363-367
Published: 01 September 2017
*Corresponding Author(s): Naveen Manuja E-mail: naveenmanuja@gmail.com
To compare the effect of different endodontic irrigants on microleakage of adhesives used within pulp chamber of primary molars. Study Design: 72 Primary molars were divided into 6 groups, according to 3 irrigants and 2 adhesives used. After de-roofing the pulp chamber, pulp was extirpated. In 36 samples, pulp chambers were bonded with Xeno V+ after irrigation with either QMix (Group1); 17%EDTA+5%NaOCl (Group2) or normal saline (Group3) and in other half samples, pulp chambers were bonded with SinglebondUniversal after irrigation with either QMix (Group 4); 17%EDTA+5% NaOCl (Group5) or normal saline (Group 6). All the samples were restored with Filtek Z350. Ten teeth from each group were assessed for dye penetration. Two samples in each group were viewed under scanning electron microscope. Data was statistically analyzed using Mann–Whitney and Kruskal Wallis tests at a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: Mean microleakage scores were: Group 1-1.5±0.70, Group 2-1.6±.51, Group 3-2.4±0.96, Group 4-1.2±0.42, Group 5-1.2±0.42, Group 6-1.1±0.32. Conclusions: Irrigation with QMix significantly reduced the microleakage of XenoV+ but had no significant effect on microleakage of SinglebondUniversal. Irrigation with EDTA/NaOCl or QMix had no detrimental effect on the sealing ability of either of the adhesive tested.
Qmix, Endodontic irrigants, Primary molars, Pulp chamber dentin, SEM.
Sidharth Kapoor, Naveen Manuja, Seema Chaudhary, Harsimran Kaur, Chaitra Tr, Ashish Amit Sinha. Effect of Qmix and Other Irrigants on Dentin Adhesives in Pulp Chambers of Primary Teeth: SEM Study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2017; 41(5): 363-367. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.5.363
1. Hariharan VS, Nandlal B, Srilatha KT. Efficacy of various root canal irrigants on removal of smear layer in the primary root canals after hand instrumentation: A scanning electron microscopy study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 28(4): 271-277, 2010.
2. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 54: 291-312, 2010.
3. Agrawal R, Tyagi SP, Nagpal R, Mishra CC and Singh UP. Effect of different root canal irrigants on the sealing ability of two all-in-one selfetch adhesives: An in vitro study. J Cons Dent 15: 377-82, 2012.
4. Santos JN, Zaia AA, Carrilho MR, Goes MF, Gomes BP, Souza-Filho FJ et al .Effect of chemical irrigants on the Bond Strength of a Self-Etching Adhesive to Pulp Chamber Dentin. J Endod 32(11): 1088-1090, 2006.
5. Nagpal R, Manuja N, Pandit IK. Adhesive bonding to pulp chamber dentin after different irrigation regimens. J Investig Clin Dent 1: 1-4, 2014.
6. Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil JM. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endodontic Topics 10: 77–102, 2005.
7. Niu W, Yoshioka A, Kobayashi C, Suda H. Scanning electron microscopic study of dentinal erosion by final irrigation with EDTA and NaOCl solutions. Int Endod J 35: 934 939, 2002.
8. Meenakumari C, Punia SK, Punia V. Root Canal Irrigants and Irrigation Techniques -A Review Part 1. Ind J Dent Sci. 4(3): 91-94, 2012.
9. Stojicic S, Shen Y, Qian W, Johnson B, Haapasalo M. Antibacterial and smear layer removal ability of a novel irrigant, Qmix. Int Endod J 45: 363–371, 2012.
10. Galvan RR, West LA, Liewehr FR, Pashley DH. Coronal microleakage of five materials used to create an intracoronal seal in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 28: 59–61, 2002.
11. Manuja, Nagpal R, Pandit IK. Dental adhesion: mechanism, techniques and durability. J Clin Pediatr Dent 36: 223-34, 2012.
12. Nagpal R, Manuja N, Pandit IK. Effect of proanthocyanidin treatment on the bonding effectiveness of adhesive restorations in pulp chamber. J Clin Pediatr Dent 38: 49-53, 2013.
13. Belli S, Zhang Y, Pereira PNR, Pashley DH. Adhesive sealing of pulp chamber. J Endod 27: 521–526, 2001.
14. Manuja N, Nagpal R, Chaudhary S. Bonding efficacy of one-step self adhesives: Effect of additional enamel etching and hydrophobic layer application. J Dent Child 79: 3-8, 2012.
15. Manuja N, Nagpal R. Resin-tooth interfacial morphology and sealing ability of one-step self etch adhesives: Microleakage and SEM study. Microsc Res Tech 75(7): 903-909, 2012.
16. Taschner M, Kümmerling M, Lohbauer U, Breschi L, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Effect of double-layer application on dentin bond durability of one-step self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 39(4): 416-426, 2014.
17. Navarra CO, Cadenaro M, Codan B, Mazzoni A, Sergo V, E Dorigo DS et al. Degree of conversion and interfacial nanoleakage expression of three one-step self-etch adhesives. Euro J of Sci 117(4): 463–469, 2009.
18. Nagpal R, Manuja N Tyagi SP, Singh UP. In vitro bonding effectiveness of three different one-step self etch adhesives with additional enamel etching. Journal of Conservative Dentistry 14(3): 258-263, 2011.
19. Shafiei F, Memarpour M. Effect of EDTA conditioning on microleakage of four adhesive systems in composite restorations. J Dent Tehran Uni Med Sci 5(4): 150-155, 2008.
20. Olszowski S, Mak P, Olszowski E, Marcinkiewicz J. Collagen type II modification by hypochlorite. Acta Biochimica Polonica 50(2): 471-479, 2003.
21. Wakabayashi H. A new method of pretreating dentin adherent surface with organic substance dissolving agent and with boning agent. J Jpan Soc Mat Dev 12; 279-294, 1993.
22. Campos KB, Carvalho RCR, Russo EMA. Microleakage with/without hybrid layer in condensable resin restoration. J Dent Res 79: 1099, 2000.
23. Pioch T, Kobaslija S, Huseinbegovic, Muller K, Dorfer CE. The effect of NaOCL dentin treatment on nanoleakage formation. J Biomed Mater Res 56(4): 578-583, 2001.
24. Toledano M, Osorio R, Perdigao J, Rosales JI, Thompson JY, Cabrerizo Vl. Effect of acid etching and collagen removal on dentin wettability and roughness. J of Biomed Mater Res 47(2): 198-203, 1999.
25. Teixeira CS, Felippe MCS, Felippe WT. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Int Endod J 38(5): 285–290, 2005.
26. Baumgartner JC, Mader CL. A scaning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimens. J Endod 13(4): 147-157, 1987.
27. Dai L, Khechen K, Khan S, Gillen B, Loushine BA, Wimmer CE. The effect of QMix, an experimental antibacterial root canal irrigant, on removal of canal wall smear layer and debris. J Endod 37: 80–84, 2011.
28. Elnaghy AM. Effect of Qmix irrigant on bond strength of glass fibre posts to root dentine. Int Endo J 47: 280–289, 2014.
Top