Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Development of a Web-Based Nationwide Korean Pediatric Dental Sedation Registry
1the Committee on Sedation, Education and Research, Korea Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.
*Corresponding Author(s): Teo Jeon Shin E-mail: snmc94@snu.ac.kr
Finding a balance between sedation efficacy and safety remains an ongoing challenge. In children, the risk of sedation-related complications is relatively high. It is of utmost importance to determine the factors related to improved overall sedation outcomes. However, most previous reports have been based on small samples at single institutions. The Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (KAPD) developed a Korean Pediatric Dental Sedation Registry using a web-based platform. Study design: Specialists in pediatric dental sedation selected the itemized list included within the registry through an extensive literature review. The web-based registry was built into the KAPD homepage to facilitate easy access to the sedation data. All teaching and university hospitals agreed to participate in the Korean Pediatric Dental Sedation Registry. Conclusion: This is the first attempt to collect sedation data on a nationwide scale in the field of pediatric dentistry. The sedation database established with the registry may facilitate standardizing and improving pediatric dental sedation clinical practices.
Anesthesia, Dental; Conscious Sedation; Database; Dental Anxiety; Pediatric Dentistry; Registries
Sung Chul Choi,Yeonmi Yang,Seunghoon Yoo, Jiyeon Kim,Taesung Jeong,Teo Jeon Shin. Development of a Web-Based Nationwide Korean Pediatric Dental Sedation Registry. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2017. 41(6);478-481.
1. Lee HH, Milgrom P, Starks H, Burke W. Trends in death associated with pediatric dental sedation and general anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth; 23: 741-746, 2013.
2. Coté CJ, Notterman DA, Karl HW, Weinberg JA, McCloskey C. Adverse Sedation Events in Pediatrics: A Critical Incident Analysis of Contributing Factors. Pediatrics; 105: 805-814, 2000.
3. Alzahrani AM, Wyne AH. Use of oral Midazolam sedation in Pediatric dentistry: a Review. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal ; 32, 2012.
4. Yasny J, Asgari A. Considerations for the use of enteral sedation in pediatric dentistry. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 32: 85-93, 2007.
5. Cravero JP, Blike GT, Beach M, et al. Incidence and Nature of Adverse Events During Pediatric Sedation/Anesthesia for Procedures Outside the Operating Room: Report From the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Pediatrics; 118: 1087-1096, 2006.
6. Cravero JP, Beach ML, Blike GT, Gallagher SM, Hertzog JH,; Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. The Incidence and Nature of Adverse Events During Pediatric Sedation/Anesthesia With Propofol for Procedures Outside the Operating Room: A Report From the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Anesth Analg; 108: 795-804, 2009.
7. Houpt MI, Weiss NJ, Koenigsberg S, Desjardins P. Comparison of chloral hydrate with and without promethazine in the sedation of young children. Pediatr Dent; 7: 41-6, 1985.
8. Coté CJ, Karl HW, Notterman DA, Weinberg JA, McCloskey C. Adverse Sedation Events in Pediatrics: Analysis of Medications Used for Sedation. Pediatrics; 106: 633-644, 2000.
9. Houpt M. Project USAP 2000-use of sedative agents by pediatric dentists: a 15-year follow-up survey. Pediatr Dent; 24: 289-294, 2002
10. Houpt M. Project USAP the use of sedative agents in pediatric dentistry: 1991 update. Pediatr Dent; 15: 36-40, 1992.
11. Frankl S, Shiere F, Fogels H. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory. J Dent Child; 29: 150-63, 1962.
12. Mason KP, Green SM, Piacevoli Q. Adverse event reporting tool to standardize the reporting and tracking of adverse events during procedural sedation: a consensus document from the World SIVA International Sedation Task Force. Br J Anaesth; 108: 13-20, 2012.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Top