Article Data

  • Views 793
  • Dowloads 163

Systematic reviews

Open Access

Effectiveness of Biology-Based Methods for Inhibiting Orthodontic Tooth Movement. A Systematic Review

  • Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M1
  • Yañez-Vico RM2
  • Solano-Reina E2
  • Palma-Fernandez JC3
  • Iglesias-Linares A3,*,

1Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium

2,Department of Stomatology. University of Seville. Seville. Spain

3,Complutense University of Madrid. Madrid. Spain.

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.6.14 Vol.41,Issue 6,November 2017 pp.494-502

Published: 01 November 2017

*Corresponding Author(s): Iglesias-Linares A E-mail: aleigl01@ucm.es

Abstract

Several experimental studies in the literature have tested different biology-based methods for inhibiting or decreasing orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) in humans. This systematic review investigated the effects of these interventions on the rate of tooth movement. Study design: Electronic [MedLine; SCOPUS; Cochrane Library; OpenGrey;Web of Science] and manual searches were conducted up to January 26th, 2016 in order to identify publications of clinical trials that compared the decreasing or inhibiting effects of different biology-based methods over OTM in humans. A primary outcome (rate of OTM deceleration/ inhibition) and a number of secondary outcomes were examined (clinical applicability, orthodontic force used, possible side effects). Two reviewers selected the studies complying with the eligibility criteria (PICO format) and assessed risk of bias [Cochrane Collaboration’s tool]. Data collection and analysis were performed following the Cochrane recommendations. Results: From the initial electronic search, 3726 articles were retrieved and 5 studies were finally included. Two types of biology-based techniques used to reduce the rate of OTM in humans were described: pharmacological and low-level laser therapy. In the first group, human Relaxin was compared to a placebo and administered orally. It was described as having no effect on the inhibition of OTM in humans after 32 days, while the drug tenoxicam, injected locally, inhibited the rate of OTM by up to 10% in humans after 42 days. In the second group, no statistically significant differences were reported, compared to placebo, for the rate of inhibition of OTM in humans after 90 days of observation when a 860 nm continuous wave GaAlA slow-level laser was used. Conclusions: The currently available data do not allow us to draw definitive conclusions about the use of various pharmacological substances and biology-based therapies in humans able to inhibit or decrease the OTM rate. There is an urgent need for more sound well-designed randomized clinical trials in the field.

Keywords

OTM, decrease, inhibition, biology-based techniques, systematic review, humans, low-level laser therapy, medication.

Cite and Share

Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M,Yañez-Vico RM,Solano-Reina E,Palma-Fernandez JC,Iglesias-Linares A. Effectiveness of Biology-Based Methods for Inhibiting Orthodontic Tooth Movement. A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2017. 41(6);494-502.

References

1. Angelopoulou, MV, Vlachou, V, Halazonetis, DJ. Pharmacological management of pain during orthodontic treatment: a meta-analysis. Orthod. Craniofac. Res; 15, 71–83, 2012.

2. Arias, OR, Marquez-Orozco, MC. Aspirin, acetaminophen, and ibuprofen: their effects on orthodontic tooth movement. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop; 130, 364–370, 2006.

3. Iglesias-Linares, A, Moreno-Fernandez, AM, Yañez-Vico, R, Mendoza-Mendoza, A, Gonzalez-Moles, M, Solano-Reina, E. The use of gene therapy vs. corticotomy surgery in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. Orthod. Craniofac. Res;14, 138-48, 2011.

4. Choi, J, Baek, S-H, Lee, J-I, Chang, Y-I. Effects of clodronate on early alveolar bone remodeling and root resorption related to orthodontic forces: a histomorphometric analysis. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop; 138, 548. e1–8; discussion 548–9, 2010.

5. Maia, LC, Antonio, AG. Systematic reviews in dental research. A guideline. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent; 37, 117–124, 2012.

6. Liberati, A, Altman, DG, Tetzlaff, J, Mulrow, C, Gøtzsche, PC, Ioannidis, JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J. Clin. Epidemiol; 62, e1–34, 2009.

7. Higgins, JPT, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ; 343, d5928, 2011.

8. Fujiyama, K. et al. Clinical effect of CO(2) laser in reducing pain in orthodontics. Angle Orthod; 78, 299–303, 2008.

9. McGorray, SP, Dolce, C, Kramer, S, Stewart, D, Wheeler, TT. A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial on the effects of recombinant human relaxin on tooth movement and short-term stability. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop; 141, 196–203, 2012.

10. Arantes, GM, Arantes, VMN, Ashmawi, HA, Posso, IP. Tenoxicam controls pain without altering orthodontic movement of maxillary canines. Orthod. Craniofac. Res; 12, 14–19, 2009.

11. Limpanichkul, W, Godfrey, K, Srisuk, N, Rattanayatikul, C. Effects of low-level laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Orthod. Craniofac. Res; 9, 38–43, 2006.

12. Kansal, A, Kittur, N, Kumbhojkar, V, Keluskar, KM, Dahiya, P. Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A clinical trial. Dent. Res. J. (Isfahan);11, 481–488, 2014.

13. Steen Law, SL, Southard, KA, Law, AS, Logan, HL, Jakobsen, JR. An evaluation of preoperative ibuprofen for treatment of pain associated with orthodontic separator placement. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop; 118, 629–635, 2000.

14. Bernhardt, MK, et al. The effect of preemptive and/or postoperative ibuprofen therapy for orthodontic pain. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop; 120, 20–27, 2001.

15. Bird, SE, Williams, K, Kula, K. Preoperative acetaminophen vs ibuprofen for control of pain after orthodontic separator placement. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop; 132, 504–510, 2007.

16. Young, AN, Taylor, RW, Taylor, SE, Linnebur, SA, Buschang, PH. Evaluation of preemptive valdecoxib therapy on initial archwire placement discomfort in adults. Angle Orthod; 76, 251–259, 2006.

17. Sodagar, A, et al. The effect of celecoxib on orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption in rat. J. Dent. (Tehran); 10, 303–311, 2013.

18. Nilsen, OG. Clinical pharmacokinetics of tenoxicam. Clin. Pharmacokinet; 26, 16–43,1994.

19. de Carlos, F, Cobo, J, Díaz-Esnal, B, Arguelles, J, Vijande, M, Costales, M. Orthodontic tooth movement after inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop; 129, 402–406, 2006.

20. de Carlos, F, Cobo, J, Perillan, C, Garcia, MA, Arguelles, J, Vijande, M, et al. Orthodontic tooth movement after different coxib therapies. Eur. J. Orthod; 29, 596–599, 2007.

21. Hauber Gameiro, G, Nouer DF, Pereira Neto JS, Siqueira VC, Andrade ED, Duarte Novaes P, et al. Effects of short- and long-term celecoxib on orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod; 78, 860–865, 2008.

22. Kaipatur, NR, Wu, Y, Adeeb, S, Stevenson, TR, Major, PW, Doschak, MR. Impact of bisphosphonate drug burden in alveolar bone during orthodontic tooth movement in a rat model: a pilot study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop; 144, 557–567, 2013.

23. Russell, RGG. Bisphosphonates: mode of action and pharmacology. Pediatrics; 119 Suppl , S150–62, 2007.

24. Iglesias-Linares, A, Yanez-Vico, R-M, Solano-Reina, E, Torres-Lagares, D, Gonzalez Moles, MA. Influence of bisphosphonates in orthodontic therapy: Systematic review. J. Dent; 38, 603–611, 2010.

25. Soma, S, Matsumoto, S, Higuchi, Y, Takano-Yamamoto, T, Yamashita, K, Kurisu, K, et al. Local and chronic application of PTH accelerates tooth movement in rats. J. Dent. Res; 79, 1717–1724, 2000.

26. Olyaee, P, Mirzakouchaki, B, Ghajar, K, Seyyedi, SA, Shalchi, M, Garjani, A, et al. The effect of oral contraceptives on orthodontic tooth movement in rat. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal; 18, e146–50, 2013.

27. Stewart, DR, Sherick, P, Kramer, S, Breining, P. Use of relaxin in orthodontics. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci; 1041, 379–387, 2005.

28. Liu, ZJ, King, GJ, Gu, GM., Shin, JY, Stewart, DR. Does human relaxin accelerate orthodontic tooth movement in rats? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci; 1041, 388–394, 2005.

29. Madan, MS, Liu, ZJ, Gu, GM, King, GJ. Effects of human relaxin on orthodontic tooth movement and periodontal ligaments in rats. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop; 131, 8.e1–10, 2007.

30. Jager, A, Zhang, D, Kawarizadeh, A, Tolba, R, Braumann, B, Lossdörfer, S, et al. Soluble cytokine receptor treatment in experimental orthodontic tooth movement in the rat. Eur. J. Orthod; 27, 1–11, 2005.

31. Yoshimatsu, M, Kitaura, H, Fujimura, Y, Kohara, H, Morita, Y, Eguchi, T, et al. Inhibitory effects of IL-12 on experimental tooth movement and root resorption in mice. Arch. Oral Biol. 57, 36–43, 2012.

32. Yabumoto, T, Miyazawa, K, Tabuchi, M, Shoji, S, Tanaka, M, Kadota, M, et al. Stabilization of tooth movement by administration of reveromycin A to osteoprotegerin-deficient knockout mice. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop; 144, 368–380, 2013.

33. Dominguez, A, Velasquez, SA. Effect of low-level laser therapy on pain following activation of orthodontic final archwires: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Photomed. Laser Surg; 31, 36–40, 2013.

34. Nobrega, C, da Silva, EMK, de Macedo, CR. Low-level laser therapy for treatment of pain associated with orthodontic elastomeric separator placement: a placebo-controlled randomized double-blind clinical trial. Photomed. Laser Surg; 31, 10–16, 2013.

35. Yamaguchi, M, Hayashi, M, Fujita, S, Yoshida, T, Utsunomiya, T, Yamamoto, H, et al. Low-energy laser irradiation facilitates the velocity of tooth movement and the expressions of matrix metalloproteinase-9, cathepsin K, and alpha(v) beta(3) integrin in rats. Eur. J. Orthod; 32, 131–139, 2010.

36. Sousa, MVS, Pinzan, A, Consolaro, A, Henriques, JFCde Freitas, MR. Systematic literature review: influence of low-level laser on orthodontic movement and pain control in humans. Photomed. Laser Surg; 32, 592–599, 2014.

37. Seifi, M, Shafeei, HA, Daneshdoost, S, Mir, M. Effects of two types of low-level laser wave lengths (850 and 630 nm) on the orthodontic tooth movements in rabbits. Lasers Med. Sci; 22, 261–264, 2007.

38. Kim, S-J, Moon, S-U, Kang, S-G, Park, Y-G. Effects of low-level laser therapy after Corticision on tooth movement and paradental remodeling. Lasers Surg. Med; 41, 524–533, 2009.

39. Shigetani, Y, Sasa, N, Suzuki, H, Okiji, T, Ohshima, H. GaAlAs laser irradiation induces active tertiary dentin formation after pulpal apoptosis and cell proliferation in rat molars. J. Endod; 37, 1086–1091, 2011.

40. Mozzati, M, Martinasso, G, Cocero, N, Pol, R, Maggiora, M, Muzio, G, et al. Influence of superpulsed laser therapy on healing processes following tooth extraction. Photomed. Laser Surg; 29, 565–571, 2011.

41. Iglesias-Linares A, Hartsfield JK Jr.Cellular and Molecular Pathways Leading to External Root Resorption. J Dent Res. 2017 Feb;96(2):145-152. doi: 10.1177/0022034516677539.

42. Gonzales, C, Hotokezaka, H, Karadeniz, EI, Miyazaki, T, Kobayashi, E, Darendeliler, MA, et al. Effects of fluoride intake on orthodontic tooth movement and orthodontically induced root resorption. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop; 139, 196–205, 2011.

43. Iglesias-Linares, A, Morford, LA, Hartsfield, JK Jr. Bone Density and Dental External Apical Root Resorption. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep;14, 292-309, 2016.

44. Cadenas-Perula, M, Yañez-Vico, RM, Solano-Reina, E, Iglesias-Linares, A. Effectiveness of biologic methods of inhibiting orthodontic tooth movement in animal studies. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop;150,33-48, 2016.

45. Papadopoulos, MA, Gkiaouris, I. A critical evaluation of meta-analyses in orthodontics. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop; 131, 589–599, 2007.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top