The Effect of DynaCleft® on Cleft Width in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

The specific aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to assess the efficacy of DynaCleft® as a method of presurgical orthopedics with infants with a unilateral cleft lip and cleft palate who used an oral obturator. Study design: Data was collected from 25 infants all of comparable age diagnosed with a unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Eight patients used DynaCleft ® and an obturator (Group Alpha) and seventeen patients only had an obturator (Group Beta). Maxillary impression casts were obtained from each patient at the initial clinic visit and at the time of cleft lip repair. Differences in alveolar cleft width were compared between the two groups. Casts were measured twice by one observer using a digital caliper. Results: Group Alpha began treatment on an average age of 24.25 days and Group Beta an average of 15.35 days of age. The average cleft width of Group Alpha was 8.13 mm and after treatment it was 4.59 mm. The average cleft width of Group Beta was 8.09 mm and 6.92 mm after treatment. Results of paired t-tests and two-sample t-test showed that cleft width changes between the two groups were significant (P = .03). Conclusions: DynaCleft ® significantly decreased the size of the alveolar cleft width compared to infants who did not use it. Providers should consider using DynaCleft® for patients who may not have access to infant maxillary orthopedics.

presurgical orthopedics, cleft lip and palate

1. Jaeger M, Braga-Silva J, Gehlen D, Sato Y, Zuker R, Fisher D. Correction of the Alveolar Gap and Nostril Deformity by Presurgical Passive Orthodontia in the Unilateral Cleft Lip. Ann Plastic Surg 59;489-494, 2007.

2.Adali N, Mars M, Noar J, Sommerlad B. Presurgical orthopedics has no effect on archform in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 49:5- 13, 2012.

3.Kozelj V. The basis for presurgical orthopedic treatment of infants with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 37:26-32, 2000.

4.Marsh H, Vannier MW.Comprehensive Care for Craniofacial Anomalies.St. Louis, CV Mosby 1985.

5. Grayson, BH, Santiago PE, Brecht LE, Cutting CB. Presurgical nasoalveolar molding in infants with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 36:486- 98, 1999.

6. Barillas I, Dec W, Warren SM, Cutting CB, Grayson BH. Nasoalveolar molding improves long-term nasal symmetry in complete unilateral cleft lip-cleft palate patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:1002-6, 2009.

7.Pfeifer TM, Grayson BH, Cutting CB. Nasoalveolar molding and gingivoperiosteoplasty versus alveolar bone graft: an outcome analysis of costs in the treatment of unilateral cleft alveolus. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 39:26-9, 2002.

8.Pool R, Farnworth TK.Preoperative lip taping in the cleft lip. Ann Plast Surg 32:243-249, 1994.

9.http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsouthmedic. com%2Fproducts%2Fdynacleft-cleft-lip-approximation%2F&- date=2015-11-06

10.Monasterio L, Ford A, Guitierrez C, Tastets ME, Garcia J.Comparative study of nasoalveolar molding methods: nasal elevator plus DynaCleft® versus NAM-Grayson in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 50:548-54, 2013.

11.Grayson BH, Cutting CB. Presurgical nasoalveolar orthopedic molding in primary correction of the nose, lip, and alveolus of infants born with unilateral and bilateral clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 38:193-8, 2001.

12. Lewis BR, Stern MR, Willmot DR. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Nov;45(6):639- 46, 2008.

13. Peltomäki T, Vendittelli BL, Grayson BH, Cutting CB, Brecht LE. Associations between severity of clefting and maxillary growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with infant orthopedics. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 38:582-6, 2001.

14. Radhakrishnan V, Sabarinath VP, Thombare P, Hazarey PV, Bonde R, Sheorain A. Presurgical nasoalveolar molding assisted primary reconstruction in complete unilateral cleft lip palate infants J Clin Pediatr Dent. Spring;34(3):267-74, 2010.

15. Kamble VD, Parkhedkar RD, Sarin SP, Patil PG Presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) for a unilateral cleft lip and palate: a clinical report J Prosthodont Jan;22(1):74-80, 2013.

16. Prahl C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, van’t Hof MA, Prahl-Andersen B. A randomized prospective clinical trial into the effect of infant orthopaedics on maxillary arch dimensions in unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft). Cleft Palate Craniofac J 40:337-342, 2003.

17. Niranjane PP, Kamble RH, Diagavane SP, Shrivastav SS, Batra P, Vasudevan SD, Patil P Current status of presurgical infant orthopaedic treatment for cleft lip and palate patients: A critical review. Indian J Plast Surg. Sep-Dec;47(3):293-302, 2014.

18. Raju R, Tate AR, The Role of Pediatric Dentistry in Multidisciplinary Cleft Palate Teams at Advanced Pediatric Dental Residency Programs Pediatr Dent 31:188-92, 2009.

19. Prahl C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, van’t Hof MA, Prahl-Andersen B. A randomized prospective clinical trial into the effect of infant orthopaedics on maxillary arch dimensions in unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft). Eur J Oral Sci 109:297-305, 2001.