Microbiologic Evaluation of Cotton and Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Tape as Endodontic Spacer Materials in Primary Molars An in Vivo Study

Objective: PTFE tape, which is commonly used as plumber's tape is an inorganic, non-fibrous, ribbon like material. The aim of this study was to evaluate PTFE tape as endodontic spacer material and to compare it with commonly used spacer material that is cotton, in primary teeth. Study Design: Seventeen children undergoing pulpectomy of lower second primary molar bilaterally were included in the study. Cotton and PTFE tape were placed as spacers on each side randomly. Samples were taken from the access cavity at baseline and after seven days to check for microbial leakage. Spacer materials were also checked for microbial contamination. Results: The results revealed that there was a significant increase in the bacterial colony count after seven days in cotton group. The access cavities were also positive for microbial leakage in the cotton group where the spacers showed positive growth. In PTFE group only two samples showed microbial contamination of spacer and out of two only one sample showed contamination of access cavity along with spacer. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that PTFE tape performed better than cotton as endodontic spacer material. Thus, PTFE tape can be recommended as an endodontic spacer material as an alternative to cotton in primary teeth.

Endodontic spacer, PTFE tape, temporary restoration, Primary teeth, Pulpectomy, Microbial leakage

1. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and young permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent;26:115-119. 2004.

2. Sjogren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G. Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J; Sep;30(5):297-306. 1997.

3. Webber RT, Del Rio CE, Brady JM, Segall RO. Sealing quality of a temporary filling material. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol;46:123–130. 1978.

4. Paranjpe A, Jain S, Alibhai KZ, Wadhwani CP, Darveau RP, Johnson JD. In vitro microbiologic evaluation of PTFE and cotton as spacer materials. Quintessence Int;43(8):703-07. 2012.

5. Naoum HJ, Chandler NP. Temporization for endodontics. Int Endod J; Dec;35(12):964-78. 2002.

6. Vail MM, Steffel CL. Preference of temporary restoration and spacers: A survey of Diplomates of the American Board of Endodontists. J Endod;32:513-15. 2006.

7. Sjogren U, Figdor D, Spangberg L, Sundqvist G. The antimicrobial effect of calcium hydroxide as a short-term intracanal dressing. Int Endod J; May;24:119-25. 1991.

8. Odabas ME, Tulunoglu O, Ozalp SO, Bodur H. Microleakage of different temporary filling materials in primary teeth. J Clin Pediat Dent ; Winter;34(2):157-60. 2009.

9. Jolly M, Singh N, Rathore M, Tandon S, Banerjee M. Propolis and commonly used intracanal irrigants: comparative evaluation of antimi-crobial potential. J Clin Pediat Dent;37(3):243-9. 2013.

10. Stean H. PTFE tape: A versatile material in restorative dentistry. Dent Update;20:146-48. 1993.

11. Beach CW, Calhoun JC, Bramwell D, Hutter JW, Miller GA. Clinical evaluation of bacterial leakage of endodontic temporary filling materials. J Endod Sep;22(9):459-62. 1996.

12. Ciftci A, Vardarli DA, Sonmez IS. Coronal microleakage of four endodontic temporary restorative materials: An in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod;108(4):67–70. 2009.

13. Troupe M, Delano EO, Orstavik D. Endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: Single vs multivisit treatment. J Endod;25:345-350. 1999.

14. Machida Y. Root canal therapy in deciduous teeth. Jpn Dent J;36:796- 802. 1983.

15. Newcomb BE, Clark SJ, Eleazer PD. Degradation of the sealing proper-ties of a zinc oxide-calcium sulfate-based temporary filling material by entrapped cotton fibers. J Endod;27:789-90. 2001.