Article Data

  • Views 658
  • Dowloads 133

Original Research

Open Access

Angel or Devil? Dentists and Dental Students Conceptions of Pediatric Dental Patients through Metaphor Analysis

  • Buldur B1,*,

1Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-42.2.7 Vol.42,Issue 2,March 2018 pp.119-124

Published: 01 March 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): Buldur B E-mail: bbuldur@gmail.com

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this qualitative study was to identify the conceptions of dentists and dental students (DSs) about pediatric dental patients (PDPs) using metaphor analysis. Study Design: The study group (N = 259) consisted of dentists and DSs. Participants completed the sentence “A pediatric dental patient is like ... because …...” in order to reveal the metaphors they use about the concept of PDPs. The data were analyzed using the mixed-methods: qualitative (metaphor analysis) and quantitative (chi-square) data analysis techniques. Results: The dentists and DSs produced 259 metaphors. These metaphors were gathered under six different conceptual categories that define a PDP as unpredictable, dangerous, uncontrollable, requiring care and sensitivity, valuable, and orientable. The most important factors leading to these conceptions were the uncooperativeness of some PDPs and the effectiveness of behavior management. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that there was no significant difference among DSs, general dentists and specialist dentists with respect to six conceptual categories that identify the conceptions about PDPs.

Keywords

dental education, qualitative research, pediatric dentistry, pediatric patients

Cite and Share

Buldur B. Angel or Devil? Dentists and Dental Students Conceptions of Pediatric Dental Patients through Metaphor Analysis. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2018. 42(2);119-124.

References

1. Seale, N.S. and P.S. Casamassimo. US predoctoral education in pediatric dentistry: its impact on access to dental care. J Dent Educ 67:23-30, 2003.

2. Eriksen, H.M., J. Bergdahl, and M. Bergdahl. A patient-centred approach to teaching and learning in dental student clinical practice. Eur J Dent Educ 12:170-175, 2008.

3. Klingberg, G. and A.G. Broberg. Dental fear/anxiety and dental behaviour management problems in children and adolescents: a review of prevalence and concomitant psychological factors. Int J Paediatr Dent 17:391-406, 2007.

4. Klingberg, G., U. Berggren, S.G. Carlsson, and J.G. Noren. Child dental fear: cause‐related factors and clinical effects. Eur J Oral Sci 103:405-412, 1995.

5. ten Berge, M., J. Veerkamp, J. Hoogstraten, and P. Prins. Parental beliefs on the origins of child dental fear in The Netherlands. ASDC J Dent Child 68:51-54, 12, 2000.

6. Armfield, J.M., J.F. Stewart, and A.J. Spencer. The vicious cycle of dental fear: exploring the interplay between oral health, service utilization and dental fear. BMC Oral health 7:1, 2007.

7. Law, C.S. and S. Blain. Approaching the pediatric dental patient: a review of nonpharmacologic behavior management strategies. J Can Dent Assoc 31:703-713, 2003.

8. American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Clinical Affairs Committee-Be-havior Management Subcommittee, and American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs Pediatr Dent 37:57-70, 2015.

9. Adair, S.M. Behavior management conference panel I report–rationale for behavior management techniques in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 26:167-170, 2004.

10. Feigal, R.J. Guiding and managing the child dental patient: a fresh look at old pedagogy. J Dent Educ 65:1369-1377, 2001.

11. Casamassimo, P.S., N.S. Seale, and K. Ruehs. General dentists’ perceptions of educational and treatment issues affecting access to care for children with special health care needs. J Dent Educ 68:23-28, 2004.

12. Lahti, S., H. Tuutti, H. Hausen, and R. Kääriäinen. Dentist and patient opinions about the ideal dentist and patient‐developing a compact ques-tionnaire. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 20:229-234, 1992.

13. Corah, N.L., R.M. O’Shea, and G.D. Bissell. The dentist-patient relation-ship: perceptions by patients of dentist behavior in relation to satisfaction and anxiety. J Am Dent Assoc 111:443-446, 1985.

14. FitzGerald, K., N.S. Seale, C.A. Kerins, and R. McElvaney. The critical incident technique: a useful tool for conducting qualitative research. J Dent Educ 72:299-304, 2008.

15. Henzi, D., E. Davis, R. Jasinevicius, and W. Hendricson. In the students’ own words: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum? J Dent Educ 71:632-645, 2007.

16. Victoroff, K.Z. and S. Hogan. Students’ perceptions of effective learning experiences in dental school: a qualitative study using a critical incident technique. J Dent Educ 70:124-132, 2006.

17. Bower, E. and S. Scambler. The contributions of qualitative research towards dental public health practice. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 35:161-169, 2007.

18. Robinson, P., S. Acquah, and B. Gibson. Drug users: oral health-related attitudes and behaviours. Br Dent J 198:219-224, 2005.

19. Meadows, L.M., A.J. Verdi, and B.F. Crabtree. Keeping up appearances: using qualitative research to enhance knowledge of dental practice. J Dent Educ 67:981-990, 2003.

20. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live by. University of Chicago press; 2008.

21. Cameron, L. and A. Deignan. Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor Symb 18:149-160, 2003.

22. Kovecses, Z., Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press; 2010.

23. Schmitt, R. Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. Qual Rep 10:358-394, 2005.

24. Davies, M.B. and N. Hughes. Doing a successful research project: Using qualitative or quantitative methods. Palgrave Macmillan; 2014.

25. Porritt, J., H. Buchanan, M. Hall, F. Gilchrist, and Z. Marshman. Assessing children’s dental anxiety: a systematic review of current measures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 41:130-142, 2013.

26. Saban, A., B.N. Kocbeker, and A. Saban. Prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learn Instr 17:123-139, 2007.

27. Vainio, L., M. Krause, and M.R. Inglehart. Patients with special needs: dental students’ educational experiences, attitudes, and behavior. J Dent Educ 75:13-22, 2011.

28. Fox, C. and J. Newton. A controlled trial of the impact of exposure to posi-tive images of dentistry on anticipatory dental fear in children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 34:455-459, 2006.

29. Kuhn, B.R. and K.D. Allen. Expanding child behavior management tech-nology in pediatric dentistry: a behavioral science perspective. Pediatr Dent 16:13-13, 1994.

30. Chambers, D. Behavior management techniques for pediatric dentists: an embarrassment of riches. ASDC J Dent Child 44:30-34, 1976.

31. Arnrup, K., A. Broberg, U. Berggren, and L. Bodin. Lack of cooperation in pediatric dentistry-the role of child personality characteristics. Pediatr Dent 24:119-128, 2002.

32. Ten Berge, M., J.S. Veerkamp, J. Hoogstraten, and P.J. Prins. Childhood dental fear in the Netherlands: prevalence and normative data. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 30:101-107, 2002.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

PubMed (MEDLINE) PubMed comprises more than 35 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top