Article Data

  • Views 865
  • Dowloads 246

Original Research

Open Access

Trends and Characteristics of Pediatric Dentistry Patients Treated under General Anesthesia

  • Maxwell N Rudie1
  • Michael M Milano2,*,
  • Michael W Roberts2
  • Kimon Divaris3

1,University of North Carolina School of Dentistry

2Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of North Carolina School of Dentistry

3School of Dentistry and Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-42.4.12 Vol.42,Issue 4,July 2018 pp.303-306

Published: 01 July 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): Michael M Milano E-mail: michael_milano@unc.edu

Abstract

Purpose: The aims of this study were to describe the demographic characteristics of pediatric dentistry patients undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia (DRGA) at UNC-Chapel Hill during the last 13 years and identify factors associated with multiple (1 versus 2 or more) DRGA visits during that timeframe. Study design: Administrative claims data were used to identify children and adolescents (age <18 years) who underwent DRGA between 1/1/2002 and 12/31/2014 at the UNC Hospitals system. Information on children's age, sex and all treatment-associated CDT codes were collected. Descriptive statistics and bivariate tests of association were used for data analyses. Results: There were 4,413 DRGAs among 3,973 children (median age=4 years 8 months, males=55%) during the study period. The annual rate of DRGAs increased over time, peaking (n=447) in 2013. Overall, 9% of children had ≥2 visits with repeat rates up to 18%. There was no association between children's sex and receipt of one versus multiple DRGAs; however, craniofacial cases were more likely (p<0.0005) to have multiple DRGAs compared to non-craniofacial ones. Conclusion: DRGAs are on the increase—with the exception of craniofacial and special health care needs patients, multiple DRGAs may be reflective of sub-optimal adherence to preventive and continuing care recommendations.

Keywords

children, pediatric dentistry, general anesthesia, behavior guidance, health services

Cite and Share

Maxwell N Rudie,Michael M Milano,Michael W Roberts,Kimon Divaris. Trends and Characteristics of Pediatric Dentistry Patients Treated under General Anesthesia. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2018. 42(4);303-306.

References

1. Clinical Affairs Committee-Behavior Management Subcommittee, Amer-ican Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on Behavior Guidance for the Pediatric Dental Patient. Pediatr Dent 37: 57-70, 2015.

2. de Souza MC, Harrison M, Marshman Z. Oral health-related quality of life following dental treatment under general anaesthesia for early child-hood caries–a UK-based study. Int J Paediatr Dent 27: 30-36, 2017.

3. Eaton JJ, McTigue DJ, Fields HW Jr, Beck M. Attitudes of contempo-rary parents toward behavior management techniques used in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 27: 107-113, 2005.

4. Patel M, McTigue DJ, Thikkurissy S, Fields HW. Parental Attitudes Toward Advanced Behavior Guidance Techniques Used in Pediatric Dentistry. Pediatr Dent 38: 30-36, 2016.

5. Ahuja R, Jyoti B, Shewale V, Shetty S, Subudhi SK, Kaur M. Compara-tive Evaluation of Pediatric Patients with Mental Retardation undergoing Dental Treatment under General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 17: 675-678, 2016.

6. Bücher K, Rothmaier K, Hickel R, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Kühnisch J. The need for repeated dental care under general anaesthesia in children. Eur J Paediatr Dent 17: 129-135, 2016.

7. Kakaounaki E, Tahmassebi JF, Fayle SA. Repeat general anaesthesia, a 6- year follow up. Int J Paediatr Dent 21: 126-131, 2011.

8. Schroth RJ, Quiñonez C, Shwart L, Wagar B. Treating early childhood caries under general anesthesia. A national review of Canadian data: J Can Dent Assoc 82: g20, 2016.

9. Cravero JP. General anesthesia for pediatric patients. In: Wilson S, ed. Oral Sedation for Dental Procedures in Children. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg; 173-181, 2015.

10. Savanheimo N, Vehkalahti MM. Five-year follow-up of children receiving comprehensive dental care under general anesthesia. BMC Oral Health 14: 154, 2014.

11. Cuzick J. A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Stat Med 4: 87-90, 1985.

12. Forsyth AR, Seminario AL, Scott J, Berg J, Ivanova I, Lee H. General anesthesia time for pediatric dental cases. Pediatr Dent 34: 129-135, 2012.

13. Roberts MW, Milano M, Lee JY. Medical diagnoses of pediatric dental patients treated under general anesthesia: a 19 year review. J Clin Pediatr Dent 33: 343-345, 2009.

14. Mallineni SK and Yiu CK. Dental treatment under general anesthesia for special-needs patients: analysis of the literature. J Investig Clin Dent 7:

325- 331, 2016.

15. Ashley PF, Williams CE, Moles DR, Parry J. Sedation versus general anaesthesia for provision of dental treatment to patients younger than 18 years. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9: CD006334, 2015.

16. Hicks CG, Jones JE, Saxen MA, Maupome G, Sanders BJ, Walker LA, Weddell JA, Tomlin A. Demand in pediatric dentistry for sedation and general anesthesia by dentist anesthesiologists: a survey of directors of dentist anesthesiologist and pediatric dentistry residencies. Anesth Prog 59: 3-11, 2012.

17. Divaris K. Predicting Dental Caries Outcomes in Children: A “Risky” Concept. J Dent Res 95: 248-254, 2016.

18. Jordan AR, Becker N, Jöhren HP, Zimmer S. Early Childhood Caries and Caries Experience in Permanent Dentition: A 15-year Cohort Study. Swiss Dent J 126: 114-119, 2016.

19. Edelstein BL and Chinn CH. Update on disparities in oral health and access to dental care for America’s children. Acad Pediatr 9: 415-419, 2009.

20. Valéra MC, Aragon I, Monsarrat P, Vaysse F, Noirrit-Esclassan E. Oral Health Education in Children before Dental Treatment under General Anesthesia. J Clin Pediatr Dent 40: 417-421, 2016.

21. Aminabadi NA, Najafpour E, Aghaee S, Sighari Deljavan A, Jamali Z, Shirazi S. Use of general anaesthesia in paediatric dentistry: barriers to discriminate between true and false cases. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 17: 89- 95, 2016.

22. Amin M, Nouri MR, Hulland S, ElSalhy M, Azarpazhooh A. Success Rate of Treatments Provided for Early Childhood Caries under General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Pediatr Dent 38: 317-324, 2016.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top