Article Data

  • Views 828
  • Dowloads 189

Case Reports

Open Access

Full-step Class II Correction Using a Modified C-palatal Plate for Total Arch Distalization in an Adolescent

  • Han SH1
  • Park JH2
  • Jung CY1
  • Kook YA1
  • Hong M3,*,

1Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, St. Vincent’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea

2Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A. T. Still University, Mesa, Ariz, International Scholar, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea

3Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea

DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-42.4.13 Vol.42,Issue 4,July 2018 pp.307-313

Published: 01 July 2018

*Corresponding Author(s): Hong M E-mail: mhhong1208@knu.ac.kr

Abstract

A 13-year-old adolescent male patient had a convex profile, severe overjet, and deep overbite with a skeletal Class II pattern. His maxillary dentition was distalized using a modified C-palatal plate (MCPP), and the treatment outcome was stable. After 37 months of total treatment, a pleasing profile and a favorable Class I occlusion was successfully achieved with 5 mm of distalization in the maxillary dentition. MCPP is a viable treatment option for full-step Class II in adolescents, especially when the patients/parents decline the extraction option.

Keywords

Cl II malocclusion, molar distalization, non-extraction, MCPP, TADs

Cite and Share

Han SH,Park JH,Jung CY,Kook YA,Hong M. Full-step Class II Correction Using a Modified C-palatal Plate for Total Arch Distalization in an Adolescent. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2018. 42(4);307-313.

References

1. Luppanapornarp S, Johnston LE Jr. The effects of premolar-extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in “clear-cut” extraction and nonextraction

Class II patients. Angle Orthod;63:257-72. 1993.

2. de Almeida-Pedrin RR, Henriques JF, de Almeida RR, de Almeida MR, McNamara JA Jr. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;136:833-42. 2009.

3. Kook YA, Kim SH, Chung KR. A modified anchorage plate for simpleand efficient distalization. J Clin Orthod;44:719- 30. 2010.

4. Vaden JL, Kiser HE. Straight talk about extraction and nonextraction: a differential diagnostic decision. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;109:445-52. 1996.

5. Abdo Quintão CC, Miguel JA, Brunharo IP, Zanardi G, Feu D. Is traditional treatment a good option for an adult with a Class II deepbite malocclusion? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Jan;141:105-12. 2012.

6. Hilgers JJ. The pendulum appliance for Class II non-compliance therapy. J Clin Orthod;26:706-14. 1992.

7. Carano A, Testa M. The distal jet for upper molar distal movement. J Clin Orthod;30:374-80. 1996.

8. Cacciatore G, Alvetro L, Defraia E, Ghislandzoni LT, Franchi L. Active-treatment effects of the Forsus fatique resistant device during comprehensive Class II correction in growing patients. Korean J Orthod;44:136-42. 2014.

9. Johes G, Buschang PH, Kim KB, Oliver DR. Class II non-extraction patients treated with the Forsus Fatique Resistant Device versus intermaxillary elastics. Angle Orthod;78:332-8. 2008.

10. Madurantakam P. Fixed or removable function appliances for Class II malocclusion. Evid Based Dent;17:52-3. 2016.

11. Park HS. The skeletal cortical anchorage using titanium microscrew implants. Korean J Orthod;29:699-706. 1999.

12. Oh YH, Park HS, Kwon TG. Treatment effects of microimplant-aided sliding mechanics on distal retreaction of posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;139:470-81. 2011.

13. Bechtold TE, Kim JW, Choi TH, Park YC, Lee KJ. Distalization pattern of the maxillary arch depending on the number of orthodontic miniscrews. Angle Orthod;83:266-73. 2013.

14. Kook YA, Bayome M, Trang VT et al. Treatment effects of a modified palatal anchorage plate for distalization evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;146:47-54. 2014.

15. Kook YA, Park JH, Kim Y, Ahn CS, Bayome M. Orthodontic Treatment of Skeletal Class II Adolescent with Anterior Open Bite using Mini-Screws and Modified Palatal Anchorage Plate. J Clin Pediatr Dent;39:187-92. 2015.

16. Kim SJ, Chun YS, Jung SH, Park SH. Three dimensional analysis of tooth movement using different types of maxillary molar distalization appliances. Korean J Orthod ;38:376-87. 2008.

17. Yu IJ, Kook YA, Sung SJ, Lee KJ, Chun YS, Mo SS. Comparison of tooth displacement between buccal mini-implants and palatal plate anchorage for molar distalization: a finite element study. Eur J Orthod;36:394-402. 2014.

18. Vu T, Bayome M, Kook YA, Han SH. Evaluation of the palatal soft tissue thickness by cone-beam computed tomography. Korean JOrthod;42:291-6. 2012.

19. Ryu JH, Park JH, Vu T, Bayome M, Kim YJ, Kook YA. Palatal bone thickness compared with cone-beam computed tomography in adolescents and adults for mini-implant placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;142:207-12. 2012.

20. Lee SM, Park JH, Bayome M, Kim HS, Mo SS, Kook YA. Evaluation of the soft tissue thickness on the palate according to dentitions using an ultrasonic device. J Clin Pediatr Dent;36:405-10. 2012.

21. Sa’aed NL, Park CO, Bayome M, Park JH, Kim Y, Kook YA. Skeletal and dental effects of molar distalization using a modified palatal anchorage plate in adolescents. Angle Orthod;85:657-64. 2015.

22. Garib DG, Bressane LB, Janson G, Gribel BF. Stability of extraction space closure Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ;149:24-30. 2016.

23. Lima Filho RM, Lima AL, de Oliveira Ruellas AC. Longitudinal study of anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal class II patients treated with Kloehn cervical headgear. Angle Orthod;73:187-93. 2003.

24. Cole WA. Accuracy of patient reporting as an indication of headgear compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;121:419-23. 2002.

25. Fuziy A, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Janson G, Angelieri F, Pinzan A. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;130:502-10. 2006.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

PubMed (MEDLINE) PubMed comprises more than 35 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top