Article Data

  • Views 173
  • Dowloads 113

Original Research

Open Access

Comparative evaluation of marginal integrity of two new fissure sealants using invasive and non-invasive techniques: a SEM study

  • Dhar Vineet1
  • Shobha Tandon1,*,

1Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry,College of Dental Surgery, Manipal-5761 19, Karnataka, India

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.24.4.74hx7311l705213j Vol.24,Issue 4,July 2000 pp.291-297

Published: 01 July 2000

*Corresponding Author(s): Shobha Tandon E-mail: none

Abstract

In this era of preventive dentistry, many dental materials used for prevention of dental diseases are available. Since last few decades efforts are being directed towards prevention of dental caries which is one of the major dental diseases tormenting mankind. The main avenues available are plaque control, use of systemic and local fluorides and use of fissure sealants. There are many factors that contribute towards a successful sealant restoration such as properties of enamel, duration of etching, acid used for etching, manipulative variables. However, one of the prime factors governing the efficacy and life expectancy of a sealant is the marginal adaptability. This study was carried out on a total of 40 intact premolar teeth, which were divided in four main groups and subjected to evaluation under Scanning Electron Microscope. The parameters checked were the width and the number of marginal gaps. The results obtained showed that Teethmate had better marginal integrity and favored the use of invasive technique over non-invasive technique.


Cite and Share

Dhar Vineet,Shobha Tandon. Comparative evaluation of marginal integrity of two new fissure sealants using invasive and non-invasive techniques: a SEM study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2000. 24(4);291-297.

References

1. Bullard RH, Leinfelder KF, Russel CM. Effect of coefficient of thermal expansion on microleakage. J Am Dent Assoc 116: 871-874, 1988.

2. Craene GP, Martens C, Dermaut R. The invasive pit and fissure sealing technique in pediatric dentistry – an SEM study of a preventive restoration. J Dent Child 55: 34-42, 1988.

3. Crim GA, Shay JS. Microleakage pattern of a resin veneered cavity liner. J Prosthet Dent 58: 273-376, 1987.

4. Goldstein JI, Yakowitz H. Practical scanning electron microscopy, 2nd ed, Plenum Press, New York and London, 1976.

5. LeBell Y, Forsten L. Sealing of preventively enlarged fissures. Acta Odontol Scand 38:101-104, 1980.

6. Lehner T. Future possibilities for prevention of caries and periodontal diseases. Br Dent J 149: 318-335, 1980.

7. Robertson W. The pits and fissures of the enamel. Dent Cosmos 31: 720, 1889.

8. Seick B, Takagi S. Chow LC. Assessment of loosely bound and firmly bound fluoride uptake by tooth enamel from topically applied fluoride treatments. J Dent Res 69: 1261-1265, 1990.

9. Shapiro J, Eidelman E. The influence of mechanical preparation of enamel prior to etching on the retention of sealants-3 year follow up. J Pedod 8: 272-277, 1984.

10. Shortall AC. Microleakage, marginal adaptation and composite resin restorations. Br Dent J 153: 223-227, 1982.

11. Smith LA, O’Brien JA, Retief DH, Bradley EL. Microleakage of two dentinal bonding restorative systems. J Dent Res (Special issue) 67: 309(Abstract #1588), 1988.


Submission Turnaround Time

Top